通过绘画和建模学习:医学生脊柱解剖学的教学模式。

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Isidora R. Beach, Erin N. D'Agostino, Raj Thakrar, David J. Lunardini
{"title":"通过绘画和建模学习:医学生脊柱解剖学的教学模式。","authors":"Isidora R. Beach,&nbsp;Erin N. D'Agostino,&nbsp;Raj Thakrar,&nbsp;David J. Lunardini","doi":"10.1002/ase.2313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ongoing research has attempted to discern the optimal way to teach surgical anatomy. This study investigated the relative effectiveness of drawing and clay modeling on learning spinal anatomy among medical students. Participants were recruited from a first-year medical school class to participate in an optional educational session in their regular course schedule. Seventy-eight students participated, and 62 completed pre- and post-session tests. Participants were randomized to one of three groups, either learning spinal anatomy by (1) drawing, (2) clay modeling, or (3) reviewing a 3D anatomy application (control). All groups referenced the anatomy application; the control group had no additional learning modality. Students had 15 min to learn major anatomical structures in the lumbar spine according to their assigned modality. Learning was evaluated in terms of score differential on pre- and post-session anatomy tests, with questions focused on anatomy applied in different contexts such as pathophysiology and radiology. Improved pre- to posttest scores were expected for the drawing and modeling groups compared to control. On average, the drawing group's scores significantly improved by 11% from pre- to posttest. Scores in the clay and control groups did not significantly improve. Drawing is thus an effective strategy for learning basic and applied spinal anatomy, and drawing and clay modeling (with adequate time) may be useful for teaching medical students to apply surgical anatomical knowledge in various contexts. These modalities are generalizable to any surgical anatomical education, and should be further explored among surgical residents given their efficacy, feasibility, and minimal use of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"16 6","pages":"1041-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning by drawing and modeling: Teaching modalities for spinal anatomy in medical students\",\"authors\":\"Isidora R. Beach,&nbsp;Erin N. D'Agostino,&nbsp;Raj Thakrar,&nbsp;David J. Lunardini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.2313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ongoing research has attempted to discern the optimal way to teach surgical anatomy. This study investigated the relative effectiveness of drawing and clay modeling on learning spinal anatomy among medical students. Participants were recruited from a first-year medical school class to participate in an optional educational session in their regular course schedule. Seventy-eight students participated, and 62 completed pre- and post-session tests. Participants were randomized to one of three groups, either learning spinal anatomy by (1) drawing, (2) clay modeling, or (3) reviewing a 3D anatomy application (control). All groups referenced the anatomy application; the control group had no additional learning modality. Students had 15 min to learn major anatomical structures in the lumbar spine according to their assigned modality. Learning was evaluated in terms of score differential on pre- and post-session anatomy tests, with questions focused on anatomy applied in different contexts such as pathophysiology and radiology. Improved pre- to posttest scores were expected for the drawing and modeling groups compared to control. On average, the drawing group's scores significantly improved by 11% from pre- to posttest. Scores in the clay and control groups did not significantly improve. Drawing is thus an effective strategy for learning basic and applied spinal anatomy, and drawing and clay modeling (with adequate time) may be useful for teaching medical students to apply surgical anatomical knowledge in various contexts. These modalities are generalizable to any surgical anatomical education, and should be further explored among surgical residents given their efficacy, feasibility, and minimal use of resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"1041-1045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2313\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正在进行的研究试图找出教授外科解剖学的最佳方式。本研究调查了绘画和粘土模型在医学生学习脊柱解剖学方面的相对有效性。参与者从医学院一年级的班级中招募,参加常规课程中的选修教育课程。78名学生参加了测试,62名学生完成了课前和课后测试。参与者被随机分为三组中的一组,通过(1)绘画、(2)粘土建模或(3)复习3D解剖学应用程序(对照)来学习脊柱解剖学。所有组均参考了解剖学应用;对照组没有额外的学习方式。学生有15 min根据指定的形态学习腰椎的主要解剖结构。根据课前和课后解剖学测试的得分差异来评估学习情况,问题集中在病理生理学和放射学等不同背景下应用的解剖学上。与对照组相比,绘图组和建模组的测试前到测试后得分有望提高。平均而言,绘画组的分数从测试前到测试后显著提高了11%。粘土组和对照组的得分没有显著改善。因此,绘画是学习基本和应用脊柱解剖的有效策略,绘画和粘土建模(有足够的时间)可能有助于教授医学生在各种情况下应用外科解剖知识。这些模式可推广到任何外科解剖教育中,鉴于其有效性、可行性和对资源的最少使用,应在外科住院医师中进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning by drawing and modeling: Teaching modalities for spinal anatomy in medical students

Ongoing research has attempted to discern the optimal way to teach surgical anatomy. This study investigated the relative effectiveness of drawing and clay modeling on learning spinal anatomy among medical students. Participants were recruited from a first-year medical school class to participate in an optional educational session in their regular course schedule. Seventy-eight students participated, and 62 completed pre- and post-session tests. Participants were randomized to one of three groups, either learning spinal anatomy by (1) drawing, (2) clay modeling, or (3) reviewing a 3D anatomy application (control). All groups referenced the anatomy application; the control group had no additional learning modality. Students had 15 min to learn major anatomical structures in the lumbar spine according to their assigned modality. Learning was evaluated in terms of score differential on pre- and post-session anatomy tests, with questions focused on anatomy applied in different contexts such as pathophysiology and radiology. Improved pre- to posttest scores were expected for the drawing and modeling groups compared to control. On average, the drawing group's scores significantly improved by 11% from pre- to posttest. Scores in the clay and control groups did not significantly improve. Drawing is thus an effective strategy for learning basic and applied spinal anatomy, and drawing and clay modeling (with adequate time) may be useful for teaching medical students to apply surgical anatomical knowledge in various contexts. These modalities are generalizable to any surgical anatomical education, and should be further explored among surgical residents given their efficacy, feasibility, and minimal use of resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信