Carlos Alberto Córdova-Velázquez, Enrique Jesús Rodríguez-Espino, Juan Manuel Martín-Bufajer, Erick Servín-Torres, Natalia Guadalupe Lerma-López
{"title":"[使用4:1缝合/伤口长度技术闭合腹壁的结果]。","authors":"Carlos Alberto Córdova-Velázquez, Enrique Jesús Rodríguez-Espino, Juan Manuel Martín-Bufajer, Erick Servín-Torres, Natalia Guadalupe Lerma-López","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparotomy is a daily procedure for the general surgeon and its main complication is the formation of hernias.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the suture length to wound length ratio 4:1 for wall closure decreases the incidence of hernia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data from patients (n = 86) in whom abdominal wall closure was performed from August 2017 to January 2018 were prospectively reviewed. Patients who could not undergo adequate follow-up, those managed with open abdomen, or those with use of non-absorbable suture materials were excluded. 2 groups were formed: in one, the suture length to wound length ratio 4:1 technique was used as wall closure, and in the other it was used conventional suture; the length of the wound-suture length was measured, and the follow-up was post-surgical. For statistical analysis it was used descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (chi-squared and Mann-Withney's U).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 groups had similar characteristics in all the inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference in dehiscence and hernias. For both complications, the 4:1 suture is a protective factor. For the first it was obtained: p = 0.000, relative risk (RR) 0.114 with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.030-0.437, and for the second, p = 0.000, RR .091, 95% CI 0.027-0.437.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abdominal wall closure using 4:1 suture/wound length was shown to decrease the incidence of hernia.</p>","PeriodicalId":21419,"journal":{"name":"Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":"61 3","pages":"289-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/6e/04435117-61-3-289.PMC10437231.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Results of abdominal wall closure using the 4:1 suture/wound lenght technique].\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Alberto Córdova-Velázquez, Enrique Jesús Rodríguez-Espino, Juan Manuel Martín-Bufajer, Erick Servín-Torres, Natalia Guadalupe Lerma-López\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparotomy is a daily procedure for the general surgeon and its main complication is the formation of hernias.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the suture length to wound length ratio 4:1 for wall closure decreases the incidence of hernia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data from patients (n = 86) in whom abdominal wall closure was performed from August 2017 to January 2018 were prospectively reviewed. Patients who could not undergo adequate follow-up, those managed with open abdomen, or those with use of non-absorbable suture materials were excluded. 2 groups were formed: in one, the suture length to wound length ratio 4:1 technique was used as wall closure, and in the other it was used conventional suture; the length of the wound-suture length was measured, and the follow-up was post-surgical. For statistical analysis it was used descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (chi-squared and Mann-Withney's U).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 groups had similar characteristics in all the inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference in dehiscence and hernias. For both complications, the 4:1 suture is a protective factor. For the first it was obtained: p = 0.000, relative risk (RR) 0.114 with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.030-0.437, and for the second, p = 0.000, RR .091, 95% CI 0.027-0.437.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abdominal wall closure using 4:1 suture/wound length was shown to decrease the incidence of hernia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social\",\"volume\":\"61 3\",\"pages\":\"289-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/6e/04435117-61-3-289.PMC10437231.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Results of abdominal wall closure using the 4:1 suture/wound lenght technique].
Background: Laparotomy is a daily procedure for the general surgeon and its main complication is the formation of hernias.
Objective: To determine if the suture length to wound length ratio 4:1 for wall closure decreases the incidence of hernia.
Material and methods: Data from patients (n = 86) in whom abdominal wall closure was performed from August 2017 to January 2018 were prospectively reviewed. Patients who could not undergo adequate follow-up, those managed with open abdomen, or those with use of non-absorbable suture materials were excluded. 2 groups were formed: in one, the suture length to wound length ratio 4:1 technique was used as wall closure, and in the other it was used conventional suture; the length of the wound-suture length was measured, and the follow-up was post-surgical. For statistical analysis it was used descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (chi-squared and Mann-Withney's U).
Results: The 2 groups had similar characteristics in all the inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference in dehiscence and hernias. For both complications, the 4:1 suture is a protective factor. For the first it was obtained: p = 0.000, relative risk (RR) 0.114 with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.030-0.437, and for the second, p = 0.000, RR .091, 95% CI 0.027-0.437.
Conclusions: Abdominal wall closure using 4:1 suture/wound length was shown to decrease the incidence of hernia.