超声引导下肋间臂神经阻滞对臂丛腋窝阻滞后止血带疼痛的疗效比较:随机临床试验。

Q2 Medicine
Seyed Alireza Seyed Siamdoust, Behrooz Zaman, Samad Noorizad, Mahzad Alimian, Mona Barekati
{"title":"超声引导下肋间臂神经阻滞对臂丛腋窝阻滞后止血带疼痛的疗效比较:随机临床试验。","authors":"Seyed Alireza Seyed Siamdoust,&nbsp;Behrooz Zaman,&nbsp;Samad Noorizad,&nbsp;Mahzad Alimian,&nbsp;Mona Barekati","doi":"10.5812/aapm-134819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A tourniquet is used to control bleeding in the surgical field. Because part of the inner arm is innervated by the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), a tourniquet can cause intolerable pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the effect of ICBN block with and without ultrasound (US) guidance on tourniquet pain after axillary block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed on 60 patients who were candidates for surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the control group (n = 22), the traditional ICBN (TICBN) blockade group (n = 19), and the US-guided ICBN blockade group (n = 19). After the intervention, the duration of the onset and intensity of pain was recorded for all patients according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in demographic variables between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The pain intensity in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.001) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.001) groups was significantly less than in the control group. The mean duration of pain onset was significantly higher in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.021) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.013) groups than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the mean of pain intensity (P = 0.48) and the mean duration of pain onset (P = 0.44) between the US-guided ICBN blockade and TICBN blockade groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pain caused by a tourniquet can be managed by ICBN block during hand and forearm surgery. It is recommended to use US guidance for more success and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"e134819"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/c2/aapm-13-2-134819.PMC10439685.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effect of Intercostobrachial Nerve Block with and Without Ultrasound Guidance on Tourniquet Pain After Axillary Block of Brachial Plexus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Alireza Seyed Siamdoust,&nbsp;Behrooz Zaman,&nbsp;Samad Noorizad,&nbsp;Mahzad Alimian,&nbsp;Mona Barekati\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/aapm-134819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A tourniquet is used to control bleeding in the surgical field. Because part of the inner arm is innervated by the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), a tourniquet can cause intolerable pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the effect of ICBN block with and without ultrasound (US) guidance on tourniquet pain after axillary block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed on 60 patients who were candidates for surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the control group (n = 22), the traditional ICBN (TICBN) blockade group (n = 19), and the US-guided ICBN blockade group (n = 19). After the intervention, the duration of the onset and intensity of pain was recorded for all patients according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in demographic variables between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The pain intensity in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.001) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.001) groups was significantly less than in the control group. The mean duration of pain onset was significantly higher in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.021) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.013) groups than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the mean of pain intensity (P = 0.48) and the mean duration of pain onset (P = 0.44) between the US-guided ICBN blockade and TICBN blockade groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pain caused by a tourniquet can be managed by ICBN block during hand and forearm surgery. It is recommended to use US guidance for more success and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"e134819\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/c2/aapm-13-2-134819.PMC10439685.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-134819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-134819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:止血带用于控制手术野出血。由于手臂内侧部分受肋臂间神经(ICBN)支配,止血带会引起无法忍受的疼痛。目的:本研究旨在比较超声引导下和不引导下ICBN阻滞对腋窝阻滞后止血带疼痛的影响。方法:本研究对60例手术候选者进行研究。将患者分为3组:对照组(n = 22)、传统ICBN (TICBN)阻断组(n = 19)和美国引导ICBN阻断组(n = 19)。干预后,根据数字评定量表(NRS)记录所有患者的疼痛发作时间和疼痛强度。数据分析采用SPSS软件。结果:3组患者人口学指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。TICBN阻断组(P = 0.001)和us引导ICBN阻断组(P = 0.001)疼痛强度明显小于对照组。与对照组相比,TICBN阻断组(P = 0.021)和us引导ICBN阻断组(P = 0.013)的平均疼痛持续时间显著增加。美国引导的ICBN阻断组和TICBN阻断组的平均疼痛强度(P = 0.48)和平均疼痛持续时间(P = 0.44)无显著差异。结论:在手部和前臂手术中,止血带引起的疼痛可以通过ICBN阻滞来控制。建议使用美国指南,以获得更大的成功和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of the Effect of Intercostobrachial Nerve Block with and Without Ultrasound Guidance on Tourniquet Pain After Axillary Block of Brachial Plexus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Comparison of the Effect of Intercostobrachial Nerve Block with and Without Ultrasound Guidance on Tourniquet Pain After Axillary Block of Brachial Plexus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Comparison of the Effect of Intercostobrachial Nerve Block with and Without Ultrasound Guidance on Tourniquet Pain After Axillary Block of Brachial Plexus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: A tourniquet is used to control bleeding in the surgical field. Because part of the inner arm is innervated by the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), a tourniquet can cause intolerable pain.

Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the effect of ICBN block with and without ultrasound (US) guidance on tourniquet pain after axillary block.

Methods: This study was performed on 60 patients who were candidates for surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the control group (n = 22), the traditional ICBN (TICBN) blockade group (n = 19), and the US-guided ICBN blockade group (n = 19). After the intervention, the duration of the onset and intensity of pain was recorded for all patients according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS.

Results: No significant differences were observed in demographic variables between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The pain intensity in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.001) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.001) groups was significantly less than in the control group. The mean duration of pain onset was significantly higher in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.021) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.013) groups than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the mean of pain intensity (P = 0.48) and the mean duration of pain onset (P = 0.44) between the US-guided ICBN blockade and TICBN blockade groups.

Conclusions: The pain caused by a tourniquet can be managed by ICBN block during hand and forearm surgery. It is recommended to use US guidance for more success and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信