超高效液相色谱-质谱联用技术(UPLC-MS/MS)控制11种大麻素的质量。

IF 2.3 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ashraf Duzan, Desiree Reinken, Mufeed M Basti
{"title":"超高效液相色谱-质谱联用技术(UPLC-MS/MS)控制11种大麻素的质量。","authors":"Ashraf Duzan,&nbsp;Desiree Reinken,&nbsp;Mufeed M Basti","doi":"10.1155/2023/3753083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cannabinoid extraction from <i>Cannabis sativa</i> L. (hemp) for nonmedical purposes has become popular in the United States. Concerns, however, have been raised regarding the accuracy of the labels for cannabinoid levels in the commercial products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we developed rapid, sensitive, selective, accurate, and validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of cannabinoids. The methods are for determining 11 cannabinoids in cannabis (hemp) extracted in oil form, and we investigated the accuracy of the labeling and thermal stability regarding the cannabinoids on 17 oil cannabis samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the UPLC chromatogram, we see a good resolution and there is no matrix effect and the accuracy were 98.2% to 102.6%, and the precision was 0.52%-8.18%. The linearity of the calibration curves in methanol was with a regression <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.99. The lowest of detection (LOD) was 5-25 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 10-50 ng/mL. The study showed that only 30% of the commercial samples were within the acceptable range of +/-10% compared to the labeled ingredient concentrations. The thermal stability test profile showed a change in the concentration of cannabinoids in each sample at 37°C for one week, with an average loss of cannabinoids up to 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validated method proved to be selective, accurate, and precise, with acceptable linearity within the calibration range with no matrix effect. The stability profile data indicated that high temperatures could change the quality of commercial samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":14974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).\",\"authors\":\"Ashraf Duzan,&nbsp;Desiree Reinken,&nbsp;Mufeed M Basti\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/3753083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cannabinoid extraction from <i>Cannabis sativa</i> L. (hemp) for nonmedical purposes has become popular in the United States. Concerns, however, have been raised regarding the accuracy of the labels for cannabinoid levels in the commercial products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we developed rapid, sensitive, selective, accurate, and validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of cannabinoids. The methods are for determining 11 cannabinoids in cannabis (hemp) extracted in oil form, and we investigated the accuracy of the labeling and thermal stability regarding the cannabinoids on 17 oil cannabis samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the UPLC chromatogram, we see a good resolution and there is no matrix effect and the accuracy were 98.2% to 102.6%, and the precision was 0.52%-8.18%. The linearity of the calibration curves in methanol was with a regression <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.99. The lowest of detection (LOD) was 5-25 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 10-50 ng/mL. The study showed that only 30% of the commercial samples were within the acceptable range of +/-10% compared to the labeled ingredient concentrations. The thermal stability test profile showed a change in the concentration of cannabinoids in each sample at 37°C for one week, with an average loss of cannabinoids up to 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validated method proved to be selective, accurate, and precise, with acceptable linearity within the calibration range with no matrix effect. The stability profile data indicated that high temperatures could change the quality of commercial samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435299/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3753083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3753083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大麻素提取大麻sativa L.(大麻)的非医疗目的已成为流行在美国。然而,人们对商业产品中大麻素水平标签的准确性提出了担忧。方法:建立快速、灵敏、选择性、准确、有效的液相色谱-串联质谱法定量测定大麻素。建立了以油形式提取的大麻中11种大麻素的测定方法,并对17种油大麻样品中大麻素的标记准确性和热稳定性进行了研究。结果:UPLC色谱分辨率好,不存在基质效应,准确度为98.2% ~ 102.6%,精密度为0.52% ~ 8.18%。在甲醇中,校准曲线线性关系良好,回归r2≥0.99。最低检出限(LOD) 5 ~ 25 ng/mL,定量限(LOQ) 10 ~ 50 ng/mL。研究表明,与标签成分浓度相比,只有30%的商业样品在+/-10%的可接受范围内。热稳定性测试曲线显示,在37℃下持续一周,每个样品中大麻素的浓度都发生了变化,大麻素的平均损失高达15%。结论:验证的方法选择性好,准确度高,精密度高,线性度在校准范围内,无基质效应。稳定性曲线数据表明,高温会改变商品样品的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).

Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).

Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).

Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).

Objective: Cannabinoid extraction from Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) for nonmedical purposes has become popular in the United States. Concerns, however, have been raised regarding the accuracy of the labels for cannabinoid levels in the commercial products.

Methods: In this study, we developed rapid, sensitive, selective, accurate, and validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of cannabinoids. The methods are for determining 11 cannabinoids in cannabis (hemp) extracted in oil form, and we investigated the accuracy of the labeling and thermal stability regarding the cannabinoids on 17 oil cannabis samples.

Results: In the UPLC chromatogram, we see a good resolution and there is no matrix effect and the accuracy were 98.2% to 102.6%, and the precision was 0.52%-8.18%. The linearity of the calibration curves in methanol was with a regression r2 ≥ 0.99. The lowest of detection (LOD) was 5-25 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 10-50 ng/mL. The study showed that only 30% of the commercial samples were within the acceptable range of +/-10% compared to the labeled ingredient concentrations. The thermal stability test profile showed a change in the concentration of cannabinoids in each sample at 37°C for one week, with an average loss of cannabinoids up to 15%.

Conclusion: The validated method proved to be selective, accurate, and precise, with acceptable linearity within the calibration range with no matrix effect. The stability profile data indicated that high temperatures could change the quality of commercial samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry publishes papers reporting methods and instrumentation for chemical analysis, and their application to real-world problems. Articles may be either practical or theoretical. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): Separation Spectroscopy Mass spectrometry Chromatography Analytical Sample Preparation Electrochemical analysis Hyphenated techniques Data processing As well as original research, Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry also publishes focused review articles that examine the state of the art, identify emerging trends, and suggest future directions for developing fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信