粗蜂胶提取物和组分的体外抗菌活性。

Alhassan Sa-Eed, Eric S Donkor, Reuben E Arhin, Patience B Tetteh-Quarcoo, Simon K Attah, Daniel E K Kabotso, Fleischer C N Kotey, Nicholas T K D Dayie
{"title":"粗蜂胶提取物和组分的体外抗菌活性。","authors":"Alhassan Sa-Eed,&nbsp;Eric S Donkor,&nbsp;Reuben E Arhin,&nbsp;Patience B Tetteh-Quarcoo,&nbsp;Simon K Attah,&nbsp;Daniel E K Kabotso,&nbsp;Fleischer C N Kotey,&nbsp;Nicholas T K D Dayie","doi":"10.1093/femsmc/xtad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The search for antimicrobials in propolis presents a new dimension for addressing the problem of antimicrobial drug resistance. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of extracts of crude propolis collected from different regions in Ghana and their active fractions. The antimicrobial activity of the extracts, as well as that of the chloroform, ethyl acetate, and petroleum ether fractions of the active samples were determined using the agar well diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the most active fractions were determined. The various crude propolis extracts frequently produced zones of inhibition against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (17/20) than <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (16/20), and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (1/20) test isolates. Chloroform and ethyl acetate solvents produced fractions possessing greater antimicrobial activity than the petroleum ether fraction. The mean MIC range of the most active fractions was greatest for <i>S. aureus</i> (76.0 ± 34.8-48.0 ± 33.0 mg/ml) than for <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (40.8 ± 33.3-30.4 ± 6.7 mg/ml) and <i>E. coli</i>, as was the mean MBC. Propolis has antimicrobial potential, and hence should be exploited as an alternative for the treatment of bacterial infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":73024,"journal":{"name":"FEMS microbes","volume":"4 ","pages":"xtad010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165684/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In vitro</i> antimicrobial activity of crude propolis extracts and fractions.\",\"authors\":\"Alhassan Sa-Eed,&nbsp;Eric S Donkor,&nbsp;Reuben E Arhin,&nbsp;Patience B Tetteh-Quarcoo,&nbsp;Simon K Attah,&nbsp;Daniel E K Kabotso,&nbsp;Fleischer C N Kotey,&nbsp;Nicholas T K D Dayie\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/femsmc/xtad010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The search for antimicrobials in propolis presents a new dimension for addressing the problem of antimicrobial drug resistance. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of extracts of crude propolis collected from different regions in Ghana and their active fractions. The antimicrobial activity of the extracts, as well as that of the chloroform, ethyl acetate, and petroleum ether fractions of the active samples were determined using the agar well diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the most active fractions were determined. The various crude propolis extracts frequently produced zones of inhibition against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (17/20) than <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (16/20), and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (1/20) test isolates. Chloroform and ethyl acetate solvents produced fractions possessing greater antimicrobial activity than the petroleum ether fraction. The mean MIC range of the most active fractions was greatest for <i>S. aureus</i> (76.0 ± 34.8-48.0 ± 33.0 mg/ml) than for <i>P. aeruginosa</i> (40.8 ± 33.3-30.4 ± 6.7 mg/ml) and <i>E. coli</i>, as was the mean MBC. Propolis has antimicrobial potential, and hence should be exploited as an alternative for the treatment of bacterial infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEMS microbes\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"xtad010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165684/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEMS microbes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsmc/xtad010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEMS microbes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsmc/xtad010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

蜂胶中抗菌素的研究为解决抗菌素耐药性问题提供了一个新的维度。本研究的目的是测定从加纳不同地区收集的粗蜂胶提取物及其活性组分的抗菌活性。采用琼脂孔扩散法测定提取物的抑菌活性,以及活性样品的氯仿、乙酸乙酯和石油醚组分的抑菌活性。测定了最有效部位的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和最小杀菌浓度(MBC)。不同粗蜂胶提取物对金黄色葡萄球菌(17/20)的抑制区比铜绿假单胞菌(16/20)和大肠杆菌(1/20)的抑制区多。氯仿和乙酸乙酯溶剂产生的馏分比石油醚馏分具有更大的抗菌活性。金黄色葡萄球菌(76.0±34.8 ~ 48.0±33.0 mg/ml)的平均MIC范围大于铜绿假单胞菌(40.8±33.3 ~ 30.4±6.7 mg/ml)和大肠杆菌(MBC)。蜂胶具有抗菌潜力,因此应作为治疗细菌感染的替代方法加以开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

<i>In vitro</i> antimicrobial activity of crude propolis extracts and fractions.

<i>In vitro</i> antimicrobial activity of crude propolis extracts and fractions.

In vitro antimicrobial activity of crude propolis extracts and fractions.

The search for antimicrobials in propolis presents a new dimension for addressing the problem of antimicrobial drug resistance. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of extracts of crude propolis collected from different regions in Ghana and their active fractions. The antimicrobial activity of the extracts, as well as that of the chloroform, ethyl acetate, and petroleum ether fractions of the active samples were determined using the agar well diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the most active fractions were determined. The various crude propolis extracts frequently produced zones of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus (17/20) than Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16/20), and Escherichia coli (1/20) test isolates. Chloroform and ethyl acetate solvents produced fractions possessing greater antimicrobial activity than the petroleum ether fraction. The mean MIC range of the most active fractions was greatest for S. aureus (76.0 ± 34.8-48.0 ± 33.0 mg/ml) than for P. aeruginosa (40.8 ± 33.3-30.4 ± 6.7 mg/ml) and E. coli, as was the mean MBC. Propolis has antimicrobial potential, and hence should be exploited as an alternative for the treatment of bacterial infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信