{"title":"种瓜得瓜，种豆得豆：从多层面调查工人群体向团队的分配情况。","authors":"Mark A Maltarich","doi":"10.1037/apl0001134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organizations commonly face the task of allocating workers to mutually exclusive teams from finite worker pools-a process called seeding. The approach an organization takes to seeding affects within-team and between-team distributions of performance or other outcomes. Substantial prior research explains the effects of combinations on team performance, but little is known about between-team combinations. I extend prior theory to a higher level of analysis, elaborating on the nature and function of between-team combinations on organization-level performance. I use a simulation method to identify seeding approaches that can maximize organizational outcomes in various contexts. Results uncover conditions under which the seeding approach is irrelevant to outcomes, instances where random assignment outperforms intentional seeding, and instances where particular approaches produce the most favorable outcomes. I discuss the implications of multilevel combinations for theory and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"202-221"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reaping what you sow: A multilevel investigation of allocation from a pool of workers to teams.\",\"authors\":\"Mark A Maltarich\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/apl0001134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Organizations commonly face the task of allocating workers to mutually exclusive teams from finite worker pools-a process called seeding. The approach an organization takes to seeding affects within-team and between-team distributions of performance or other outcomes. Substantial prior research explains the effects of combinations on team performance, but little is known about between-team combinations. I extend prior theory to a higher level of analysis, elaborating on the nature and function of between-team combinations on organization-level performance. I use a simulation method to identify seeding approaches that can maximize organizational outcomes in various contexts. Results uncover conditions under which the seeding approach is irrelevant to outcomes, instances where random assignment outperforms intentional seeding, and instances where particular approaches produce the most favorable outcomes. I discuss the implications of multilevel combinations for theory and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"202-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001134\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
组织通常面临着从有限的员工库中分配员工到相互排斥的团队的任务--这一过程被称为 "播种"。组织采用何种方法进行播种会影响团队内部和团队之间的绩效或其他结果的分布。大量先前的研究解释了组合对团队绩效的影响，但对团队间的组合却知之甚少。我将先前的理论扩展到更高的分析层面，详细阐述了队际组合对组织层面绩效的性质和作用。我使用一种模拟方法来确定在各种情况下能够使组织成果最大化的播种方法。研究结果揭示了播种方法与结果无关的条件、随机分配优于有意播种的情况，以及特定方法产生最有利结果的情况。我将讨论多层次组合对理论和实践的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有）。
Reaping what you sow: A multilevel investigation of allocation from a pool of workers to teams.
Organizations commonly face the task of allocating workers to mutually exclusive teams from finite worker pools-a process called seeding. The approach an organization takes to seeding affects within-team and between-team distributions of performance or other outcomes. Substantial prior research explains the effects of combinations on team performance, but little is known about between-team combinations. I extend prior theory to a higher level of analysis, elaborating on the nature and function of between-team combinations on organization-level performance. I use a simulation method to identify seeding approaches that can maximize organizational outcomes in various contexts. Results uncover conditions under which the seeding approach is irrelevant to outcomes, instances where random assignment outperforms intentional seeding, and instances where particular approaches produce the most favorable outcomes. I discuss the implications of multilevel combinations for theory and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including:
1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses).
2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research.
3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
