奥拉帕尼联合西迪拉尼或杜伐鲁单抗治疗HRR突变的抗铂卵巢癌症的随机、两臂、非对照2期研究:KGOG 3045的亚研究。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yoo-Na Kim, Je-Gun Joung, Eunhyang Park, Jae-Weon Kim, Jung Bok Lee, Jinyeong Lim, Sunghoon Kim, Chel Hun Choi, Hee Seung Kim, Jongsuk Chung, Byoung-Gie Kim, Jung-Yun Lee
{"title":"奥拉帕尼联合西迪拉尼或杜伐鲁单抗治疗HRR突变的抗铂卵巢癌症的随机、两臂、非对照2期研究:KGOG 3045的亚研究。","authors":"Yoo-Na Kim,&nbsp;Je-Gun Joung,&nbsp;Eunhyang Park,&nbsp;Jae-Weon Kim,&nbsp;Jung Bok Lee,&nbsp;Jinyeong Lim,&nbsp;Sunghoon Kim,&nbsp;Chel Hun Choi,&nbsp;Hee Seung Kim,&nbsp;Jongsuk Chung,&nbsp;Byoung-Gie Kim,&nbsp;Jung-Yun Lee","doi":"10.1002/ijc.34696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Choosing an optimal concomitant drug for combination with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor based on patient-specific biomarker status may help increase to improve treatment efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of different PARP inhibitor-based combinations in patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations have not been evaluated in ovarian cancer. In this sub-study of Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3045, we compared the efficacy and safety of two olaparib-based combinations and biomarkers of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with HRR gene mutations. Patients were randomized to receive either olaparib (200 mg twice a day) + cediranib (30 mg daily) (Arm 1, n = 16) or olaparib (300 mg) + durvalumab (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks) (Arm 2, n = 14). The objective response rates for Arm 1 and Arm 2 were 50.0% and 42.9%, respectively. Most patients (83.3%) had <i>BRCA</i> mutations, which were similarly distributed between arms. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 37.5% and 35.7% of the patients, respectively, but all were managed properly. A high vascular endothelial growth factor signature was associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 1, whereas immune markers (PD-L1 expression [CPS ≥10], CD8, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) were associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 2. The activation of homologous recombination pathway upon disease progression was associated with poor response to subsequent therapy. Based on comprehensive biomarker profiling, including immunohistochemistry, whole-exome and RNA sequencing and whole blood-based analyses, we identified biomarkers that could help inform which of the two combination strategies is appropriate given a patient's biomarker status. Our findings have the potential to improve treatment outcome for patients with ovarian cancer in the PARP inhibitor era.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":"153 12","pages":"2032-2044"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized, two-arm, noncomparative phase 2 study of olaparib plus cediranib or durvalumab in HRR-mutated, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A substudy of KGOG 3045\",\"authors\":\"Yoo-Na Kim,&nbsp;Je-Gun Joung,&nbsp;Eunhyang Park,&nbsp;Jae-Weon Kim,&nbsp;Jung Bok Lee,&nbsp;Jinyeong Lim,&nbsp;Sunghoon Kim,&nbsp;Chel Hun Choi,&nbsp;Hee Seung Kim,&nbsp;Jongsuk Chung,&nbsp;Byoung-Gie Kim,&nbsp;Jung-Yun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.34696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Choosing an optimal concomitant drug for combination with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor based on patient-specific biomarker status may help increase to improve treatment efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of different PARP inhibitor-based combinations in patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations have not been evaluated in ovarian cancer. In this sub-study of Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3045, we compared the efficacy and safety of two olaparib-based combinations and biomarkers of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with HRR gene mutations. Patients were randomized to receive either olaparib (200 mg twice a day) + cediranib (30 mg daily) (Arm 1, n = 16) or olaparib (300 mg) + durvalumab (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks) (Arm 2, n = 14). The objective response rates for Arm 1 and Arm 2 were 50.0% and 42.9%, respectively. Most patients (83.3%) had <i>BRCA</i> mutations, which were similarly distributed between arms. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 37.5% and 35.7% of the patients, respectively, but all were managed properly. A high vascular endothelial growth factor signature was associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 1, whereas immune markers (PD-L1 expression [CPS ≥10], CD8, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) were associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 2. The activation of homologous recombination pathway upon disease progression was associated with poor response to subsequent therapy. Based on comprehensive biomarker profiling, including immunohistochemistry, whole-exome and RNA sequencing and whole blood-based analyses, we identified biomarkers that could help inform which of the two combination strategies is appropriate given a patient's biomarker status. Our findings have the potential to improve treatment outcome for patients with ovarian cancer in the PARP inhibitor era.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"153 12\",\"pages\":\"2032-2044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.34696\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.34696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据患者特异性生物标志物状态,选择与聚-ADP核糖聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂联合使用的最佳联合用药可能有助于提高癌症患者的治疗效果。然而,基于PARP抑制剂的不同组合在卵巢癌症同源重组修复(HRR)突变患者中的有效性和安全性尚未得到评估。在韩国妇科肿瘤组(KGOG)3045的这项子研究中,我们比较了两种基于奥拉帕尼的组合和HRR基因突变的抗铂卵巢癌症患者的生物标志物的有效性和安全性。患者随机接受奥拉帕尼(200 mg,每天两次) + 西地拉尼(30 mg每日)(第1组,n = 16) 或奥拉帕尼(300 mg) + 杜伐单抗(1500 mg每4次 周)(第2组,n = 14) 。第1组和第2组的客观有效率分别为50.0%和42.9%。大多数患者(83.3%)都有BRCA突变,其在手臂之间的分布相似。37.5%和35.7%的患者分别观察到3级或4级治疗相关不良事件,但均得到了妥善处理。高血管内皮生长因子特征与第1组的良好结果相关,而免疫标志物(PD-L1表达[CPS≥10]、CD8、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和血小板与淋巴细胞比率)与第2组的良好结局相关。疾病进展时同源重组途径的激活与后续治疗的不良反应有关。基于全面的生物标志物分析,包括免疫组织化学、全外显子组和RNA测序以及基于全血的分析,我们确定了有助于告知患者生物标志物状态下两种组合策略中哪一种是合适的生物标记物。我们的研究结果有可能改善PARP抑制剂时代癌症患者的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Randomized, two-arm, noncomparative phase 2 study of olaparib plus cediranib or durvalumab in HRR-mutated, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A substudy of KGOG 3045

Randomized, two-arm, noncomparative phase 2 study of olaparib plus cediranib or durvalumab in HRR-mutated, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A substudy of KGOG 3045

Choosing an optimal concomitant drug for combination with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor based on patient-specific biomarker status may help increase to improve treatment efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of different PARP inhibitor-based combinations in patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations have not been evaluated in ovarian cancer. In this sub-study of Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3045, we compared the efficacy and safety of two olaparib-based combinations and biomarkers of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with HRR gene mutations. Patients were randomized to receive either olaparib (200 mg twice a day) + cediranib (30 mg daily) (Arm 1, n = 16) or olaparib (300 mg) + durvalumab (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks) (Arm 2, n = 14). The objective response rates for Arm 1 and Arm 2 were 50.0% and 42.9%, respectively. Most patients (83.3%) had BRCA mutations, which were similarly distributed between arms. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 37.5% and 35.7% of the patients, respectively, but all were managed properly. A high vascular endothelial growth factor signature was associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 1, whereas immune markers (PD-L1 expression [CPS ≥10], CD8, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) were associated with favorable outcomes in Arm 2. The activation of homologous recombination pathway upon disease progression was associated with poor response to subsequent therapy. Based on comprehensive biomarker profiling, including immunohistochemistry, whole-exome and RNA sequencing and whole blood-based analyses, we identified biomarkers that could help inform which of the two combination strategies is appropriate given a patient's biomarker status. Our findings have the potential to improve treatment outcome for patients with ovarian cancer in the PARP inhibitor era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信