一项确定常规护理中药物相关问题(DRP)的观察性研究,以及采用计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的单位剂量分配系统(UDDS)评估临床风险和可预防性的专家小组评估。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Pharmazie Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1691/ph.2023.3557
F V Wildhagen, M P Neininger, J Hensen, A Steinbeck, O Zube, T Bertsche
{"title":"一项确定常规护理中药物相关问题(DRP)的观察性研究,以及采用计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的单位剂量分配系统(UDDS)评估临床风险和可预防性的专家小组评估。","authors":"F V Wildhagen,&nbsp;M P Neininger,&nbsp;J Hensen,&nbsp;A Steinbeck,&nbsp;O Zube,&nbsp;T Bertsche","doi":"10.1691/ph.2023.3557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and aim:</i> Drug-related problems (DRP) jeopardize patient safety. Unit-dose dispensing systems (UDDS) with computerized-physician-order-entry (CPOE) and clinical-decision-support-systems (CDSS) were reported as a promising concept for preventing DRP. We aimed at identifying and categorizing DRP in peroral drug administration considering their clinical risk and preventability by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. <i>Investigations:</i> In surgical and internal-medicine departments, we observed routine procedures in peroral drug administration for DRP. An expert panel including pharmaceutical and nursing expertise categorized the identified 18 DRP categories into three levels: DRP that have not yet resulted in medication errors (ME) (Level-I), DRP where ME have occurred but have not yet reached the patient (Level-II), and DRP where ME have occurred and have reached the patient (Level-III). Additionally, the panel categorized DRP according to their clinical risk and whether the implementation of UDSS/CPOE/CDSS can prevent them. <i>Results:</i> In 77 surgical patients, 1,849 peroral drug administration procedures, and in 149 internal-medicine patients, 1,405 procedures were observed. The 18 DRP categories were identified with a frequency of 0.6%-26.7% (Level-I), 0.1%-21.5% (Level-II), and 0.0%-1.0% (Level-III). Of those, four categories were considered of high clinical risk: \"Name of the medication is not readable\", \"Prescribed medication is not prepared for administration\", \"An incorrect or non-prescribed medication is prepared\", and \"A medication is prepared for the wrong patient (mix-up)\". Twelve DRP categories were categorized as highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. <i>Conclusions:</i>Under routine conditions, we identified a substantial number of DRPs. An expert panel categorized many of those DRPs as clinically highly relevant and highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20145,"journal":{"name":"Pharmazie","volume":"78 8","pages":"134-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Observational Study to Identify Drug-related Problems (DRP) in Routine Care and An Expert Panel Assessment to Rate Clinical Risk and Preventability by Unit-dose Dispensing Systems (UDDS) with Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and Clinical Decision-Support Systems (CDSS).\",\"authors\":\"F V Wildhagen,&nbsp;M P Neininger,&nbsp;J Hensen,&nbsp;A Steinbeck,&nbsp;O Zube,&nbsp;T Bertsche\",\"doi\":\"10.1691/ph.2023.3557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and aim:</i> Drug-related problems (DRP) jeopardize patient safety. Unit-dose dispensing systems (UDDS) with computerized-physician-order-entry (CPOE) and clinical-decision-support-systems (CDSS) were reported as a promising concept for preventing DRP. We aimed at identifying and categorizing DRP in peroral drug administration considering their clinical risk and preventability by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. <i>Investigations:</i> In surgical and internal-medicine departments, we observed routine procedures in peroral drug administration for DRP. An expert panel including pharmaceutical and nursing expertise categorized the identified 18 DRP categories into three levels: DRP that have not yet resulted in medication errors (ME) (Level-I), DRP where ME have occurred but have not yet reached the patient (Level-II), and DRP where ME have occurred and have reached the patient (Level-III). Additionally, the panel categorized DRP according to their clinical risk and whether the implementation of UDSS/CPOE/CDSS can prevent them. <i>Results:</i> In 77 surgical patients, 1,849 peroral drug administration procedures, and in 149 internal-medicine patients, 1,405 procedures were observed. The 18 DRP categories were identified with a frequency of 0.6%-26.7% (Level-I), 0.1%-21.5% (Level-II), and 0.0%-1.0% (Level-III). Of those, four categories were considered of high clinical risk: \\\"Name of the medication is not readable\\\", \\\"Prescribed medication is not prepared for administration\\\", \\\"An incorrect or non-prescribed medication is prepared\\\", and \\\"A medication is prepared for the wrong patient (mix-up)\\\". Twelve DRP categories were categorized as highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. <i>Conclusions:</i>Under routine conditions, we identified a substantial number of DRPs. An expert panel categorized many of those DRPs as clinically highly relevant and highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmazie\",\"volume\":\"78 8\",\"pages\":\"134-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmazie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2023.3557\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmazie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2023.3557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:药物相关问题(Drug-related problems, DRP)危及患者安全。据报道,单位剂量分配系统(UDDS)与计算机化医生订单输入(CPOE)和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)是预防DRP的一个有前途的概念。我们的目的是通过UDSS/CPOE/CDSS对口服给药中DRP的临床风险和可预防性进行识别和分类。调查:在外科和内科,我们观察了DRP的口服给药的常规程序。包括药学和护理专业知识在内的专家小组将确定的18个DRP类别分为三个级别:尚未导致用药错误(ME)的DRP(一级),已经发生ME但尚未影响到患者的DRP(二级),以及已经发生ME并已影响到患者的DRP(三级)。此外,专家组根据DRP的临床风险以及实施UDSS/CPOE/CDSS是否可以预防DRP进行分类。结果:77例外科患者有1849例经口给药程序,149例内科患者有1405例经口给药程序。18种DRP类型的识别频率分别为0.6% ~ 26.7%(一级)、0.1% ~ 21.5%(二级)和0.0% ~ 1.0%(三级)。其中,四类被认为具有高临床风险:“药物名称不可读”,“处方药物未准备给药”,“准备了不正确或非处方药物”,以及“为错误的患者准备了药物(混淆)”。12个DRP类别被UDSS/CPOE/CDSS列为高度可预防的类别。结论:在常规条件下,我们发现了大量的drp。一个专家小组将许多这些drp归类为临床高度相关,并通过UDSS/CPOE/CDSS高度可预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Observational Study to Identify Drug-related Problems (DRP) in Routine Care and An Expert Panel Assessment to Rate Clinical Risk and Preventability by Unit-dose Dispensing Systems (UDDS) with Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and Clinical Decision-Support Systems (CDSS).

Background and aim: Drug-related problems (DRP) jeopardize patient safety. Unit-dose dispensing systems (UDDS) with computerized-physician-order-entry (CPOE) and clinical-decision-support-systems (CDSS) were reported as a promising concept for preventing DRP. We aimed at identifying and categorizing DRP in peroral drug administration considering their clinical risk and preventability by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. Investigations: In surgical and internal-medicine departments, we observed routine procedures in peroral drug administration for DRP. An expert panel including pharmaceutical and nursing expertise categorized the identified 18 DRP categories into three levels: DRP that have not yet resulted in medication errors (ME) (Level-I), DRP where ME have occurred but have not yet reached the patient (Level-II), and DRP where ME have occurred and have reached the patient (Level-III). Additionally, the panel categorized DRP according to their clinical risk and whether the implementation of UDSS/CPOE/CDSS can prevent them. Results: In 77 surgical patients, 1,849 peroral drug administration procedures, and in 149 internal-medicine patients, 1,405 procedures were observed. The 18 DRP categories were identified with a frequency of 0.6%-26.7% (Level-I), 0.1%-21.5% (Level-II), and 0.0%-1.0% (Level-III). Of those, four categories were considered of high clinical risk: "Name of the medication is not readable", "Prescribed medication is not prepared for administration", "An incorrect or non-prescribed medication is prepared", and "A medication is prepared for the wrong patient (mix-up)". Twelve DRP categories were categorized as highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. Conclusions:Under routine conditions, we identified a substantial number of DRPs. An expert panel categorized many of those DRPs as clinically highly relevant and highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmazie
Pharmazie 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: The journal DiePharmazie publishs reviews, experimental studies, letters to the editor, as well as book reviews. The following fields of pharmacy are covered: Pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry; Pharmaceutical analysis and drug control; Pharmaceutical technolgy; Biopharmacy (biopharmaceutics, pharmacokinetics, biotransformation); Experimental and clinical pharmacology; Pharmaceutical biology (pharmacognosy); Clinical pharmacy; History of pharmacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信