微创钢板接骨术治疗肩胛骨骨折。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1007/s00064-023-00819-5
B J M van de Wall, R J Hoepelman, C Michelitsch, N Diwersi, C Sommer, R Babst, F J P Beeres
{"title":"微创钢板接骨术治疗肩胛骨骨折。","authors":"B J M van de Wall, R J Hoepelman, C Michelitsch, N Diwersi, C Sommer, R Babst, F J P Beeres","doi":"10.1007/s00064-023-00819-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Presentation of a minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of scapular fractures and the clinical outcome using this technique.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula body and glenoid neck (AO 14B and 14F) and simple intra-articular fractures of the glenoid.</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>Complex intra-articular fractures and isolated fractures of the coracoid base.</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Make a straight or slightly curved incision along the lateral margin of the scapula leaving the deltoid fascia intact. Identify the interval between the teres minor muscle and infraspinatus to visualize the lateral column, whilst retracting the deltoid to visualize the glenoid neck. Reduce and align the fracture using direct and indirect reduction tools. A second window on the medial border of the scapula can be made to aid reduction and/or to augment stability. Small (2.0-2.7 mm) plates in a 90° configuration on the lateral border and, if required, on the medial border are used. Intra-operative imaging confirms adequate reduction and extra-articular screw placement.</p><p><strong>Postoperative management: </strong>Direct postoperative free functional nonweight-bearing rehabilitation limited to 90° abduction for the first 6 weeks. Sling for comfort. Free range of motion and permissive weight-bearing after 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected data from 35 patients treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) between 2011 and 2021. Average age was 53 ± 15.1 years (range 21-71 years); 17 had a type B and 18 a type F fracture according the AO classification. All patients suffered concomitant injuries of which thoracic (n = 33) and upper extremity (n = 25) injuries were most common. Double plating of the lateral border (n = 30) was most commonly performed as described in the surgical technique section. One patient underwent an additional osteosynthesis 3 months after initial surgery due to pain and lack of radiological signs of healing of a fracture extension into the spine of the scapula. In the same patient, the plate on the spine of scapula was later removed due to plate irritation. In 2 patients postoperative images showed a screw protruding into the glenohumeral joint requiring revision surgery. After standardisation of intra-operative imaging following these two cases, intra-articular screw placement did not occur anymore. No patient suffered from iatrogenic nerve injury and none developed a wound infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":54677,"journal":{"name":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","volume":" ","pages":"390-396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for scapular fractures.\",\"authors\":\"B J M van de Wall, R J Hoepelman, C Michelitsch, N Diwersi, C Sommer, R Babst, F J P Beeres\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00064-023-00819-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Presentation of a minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of scapular fractures and the clinical outcome using this technique.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula body and glenoid neck (AO 14B and 14F) and simple intra-articular fractures of the glenoid.</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>Complex intra-articular fractures and isolated fractures of the coracoid base.</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Make a straight or slightly curved incision along the lateral margin of the scapula leaving the deltoid fascia intact. Identify the interval between the teres minor muscle and infraspinatus to visualize the lateral column, whilst retracting the deltoid to visualize the glenoid neck. Reduce and align the fracture using direct and indirect reduction tools. A second window on the medial border of the scapula can be made to aid reduction and/or to augment stability. Small (2.0-2.7 mm) plates in a 90° configuration on the lateral border and, if required, on the medial border are used. Intra-operative imaging confirms adequate reduction and extra-articular screw placement.</p><p><strong>Postoperative management: </strong>Direct postoperative free functional nonweight-bearing rehabilitation limited to 90° abduction for the first 6 weeks. Sling for comfort. Free range of motion and permissive weight-bearing after 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected data from 35 patients treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) between 2011 and 2021. Average age was 53 ± 15.1 years (range 21-71 years); 17 had a type B and 18 a type F fracture according the AO classification. All patients suffered concomitant injuries of which thoracic (n = 33) and upper extremity (n = 25) injuries were most common. Double plating of the lateral border (n = 30) was most commonly performed as described in the surgical technique section. One patient underwent an additional osteosynthesis 3 months after initial surgery due to pain and lack of radiological signs of healing of a fracture extension into the spine of the scapula. In the same patient, the plate on the spine of scapula was later removed due to plate irritation. In 2 patients postoperative images showed a screw protruding into the glenohumeral joint requiring revision surgery. After standardisation of intra-operative imaging following these two cases, intra-articular screw placement did not occur anymore. No patient suffered from iatrogenic nerve injury and none developed a wound infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"390-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-023-00819-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-023-00819-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:介绍一种治疗肩胛骨骨折的微创手术方法及其临床效果。适应症:肩胛骨体、盂颈移位性关节外骨折(ao14b、14F)及单纯盂内骨折。禁忌症:复杂的关节内骨折和孤立的喙基部骨折。手术技术:沿肩胛骨外侧缘做一个直的或微弯的切口,保持三角筋膜完整。确定小圆肌和冈下肌之间的间隙,以显示外侧柱,同时缩回三角肌以显示盂颈。使用直接和间接复位工具复位并对准骨折。可在肩胛骨内侧缘处开第二扇窗,以帮助复位和/或增强稳定性。小(2.0-2.7 毫米)板在90°配置的侧面边界,如果需要,在内侧边界使用。术中影像学证实复位充分,关节外螺钉置入。术后处理:前6周直接术后自由功能非负重康复,限制90°外展。吊带舒适。6周后可自由活动和负重。结果:我们收集了2011年至2021年间35例微创钢板内固定(MIPO)患者的数据。平均年龄53岁 ±15.1岁(21 ~ 71岁);AO分级为B型骨折17例,F型骨折18例。所有患者均伴有损伤,其中胸部(n = 33)和上肢(n = 25)损伤最为常见。侧缘双钢板(n = 30)最常采用手术技术部分所述的方法。1例患者在初次手术3个月后,由于骨折延伸至肩胛骨脊柱的疼痛和缺乏愈合的影像学迹象,接受了额外的植骨手术。在同一例患者中,由于钢板刺激,肩胛骨脊柱上的钢板随后被取出。2例患者术后图像显示螺钉突出到盂肱关节,需要翻修手术。在这两个病例的术中影像学标准化后,不再发生关节内螺钉置入。无患者发生医源性神经损伤,无患者发生伤口感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for scapular fractures.

Objective: Presentation of a minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of scapular fractures and the clinical outcome using this technique.

Indications: Displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula body and glenoid neck (AO 14B and 14F) and simple intra-articular fractures of the glenoid.

Contraindications: Complex intra-articular fractures and isolated fractures of the coracoid base.

Surgical technique: Make a straight or slightly curved incision along the lateral margin of the scapula leaving the deltoid fascia intact. Identify the interval between the teres minor muscle and infraspinatus to visualize the lateral column, whilst retracting the deltoid to visualize the glenoid neck. Reduce and align the fracture using direct and indirect reduction tools. A second window on the medial border of the scapula can be made to aid reduction and/or to augment stability. Small (2.0-2.7 mm) plates in a 90° configuration on the lateral border and, if required, on the medial border are used. Intra-operative imaging confirms adequate reduction and extra-articular screw placement.

Postoperative management: Direct postoperative free functional nonweight-bearing rehabilitation limited to 90° abduction for the first 6 weeks. Sling for comfort. Free range of motion and permissive weight-bearing after 6 weeks.

Results: We collected data from 35 patients treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) between 2011 and 2021. Average age was 53 ± 15.1 years (range 21-71 years); 17 had a type B and 18 a type F fracture according the AO classification. All patients suffered concomitant injuries of which thoracic (n = 33) and upper extremity (n = 25) injuries were most common. Double plating of the lateral border (n = 30) was most commonly performed as described in the surgical technique section. One patient underwent an additional osteosynthesis 3 months after initial surgery due to pain and lack of radiological signs of healing of a fracture extension into the spine of the scapula. In the same patient, the plate on the spine of scapula was later removed due to plate irritation. In 2 patients postoperative images showed a screw protruding into the glenohumeral joint requiring revision surgery. After standardisation of intra-operative imaging following these two cases, intra-articular screw placement did not occur anymore. No patient suffered from iatrogenic nerve injury and none developed a wound infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedics and Traumatology is directed toward all orthopedic surgeons, trauma-tologists, hand surgeons, specialists in sports injuries, orthopedics and rheumatology as well as gene-al surgeons who require access to reliable information on current operative methods to ensure the quality of patient advice, preoperative planning, and postoperative care. The journal presents established and new operative procedures in uniformly structured and extensively illustrated contributions. All aspects are presented step-by-step from indications, contraindications, patient education, and preparation of the operation right through to postoperative care. The advantages and disadvantages, possible complications, deficiencies and risks of the methods as well as significant results with their evaluation criteria are discussed. To allow the reader to assess the outcome, results are detailed and based on internationally recognized scoring systems. Orthopedics and Traumatology facilitates effective advancement and further education for all those active in both special and conservative fields of orthopedics, traumatology, and general surgery, offers sup-port for therapeutic decision-making, and provides – more than 30 years after its first publication – constantly expanding and up-to-date teaching on operative techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信