根据GDPR评估荷兰健康数据规则。

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI:10.1163/15718093-bja10096

Irith Kist

{"title":"根据GDPR评估荷兰健康数据规则。","authors":"Irith Kist","doi":"10.1163/15718093-bja10096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2021, the European Commission published its Assessment of the EU Member States' rules on health data in the light of General Data Protection Regulation. The Commission concluded that the GDPR has been interpreted in many ways in the EU as regards health research, and national implementation legislation has resulted in a fragmented legal landscape. Several lawful bases are used as a legitimation for the secondary use of health data. I address the Dutch legislation on the re-use, or secondary use of health data for scientific research where explicit consent is the general rule. However, both the GDPR, the Dutch GDPR Implementation Act and sectoral health legislation leave room for alternatives. I conclude that a further review of these alternatives is required to enhance scientific health research with the secondary use of health data, and I sketch a few avenues for further exploration.","PeriodicalId":43934,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","volume":"30 3","pages":"322-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the Dutch Rules on Health Data in the Light of the GDPR.\",\"authors\":\"Irith Kist\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718093-bja10096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2021, the European Commission published its Assessment of the EU Member States' rules on health data in the light of General Data Protection Regulation. The Commission concluded that the GDPR has been interpreted in many ways in the EU as regards health research, and national implementation legislation has resulted in a fragmented legal landscape. Several lawful bases are used as a legitimation for the secondary use of health data. I address the Dutch legislation on the re-use, or secondary use of health data for scientific research where explicit consent is the general rule. However, both the GDPR, the Dutch GDPR Implementation Act and sectoral health legislation leave room for alternatives. I conclude that a further review of these alternatives is required to enhance scientific health research with the secondary use of health data, and I sketch a few avenues for further exploration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"322-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年，欧盟委员会根据《一般数据保护条例》发布了对欧盟成员国健康数据规则的评估。委员会的结论是，欧盟在卫生研究方面对《通用数据保护条例》有多种解释，国家实施立法造成了支离破碎的法律格局。若干合法依据被用作二次使用卫生数据的合法依据。我要谈到荷兰关于为科学研究重新使用或二次使用健康数据的立法，在这种情况下，明确同意是一般规则。然而，GDPR、荷兰GDPR实施法案和部门卫生立法都为替代方案留下了余地。我的结论是，需要对这些替代方法进行进一步审查，以加强科学的卫生研究，并对卫生数据进行二次利用，我概述了一些进一步探索的途径。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Assessment of the Dutch Rules on Health Data in the Light of the GDPR.

In 2021, the European Commission published its Assessment of the EU Member States' rules on health data in the light of General Data Protection Regulation. The Commission concluded that the GDPR has been interpreted in many ways in the EU as regards health research, and national implementation legislation has resulted in a fragmented legal landscape. Several lawful bases are used as a legitimation for the secondary use of health data. I address the Dutch legislation on the re-use, or secondary use of health data for scientific research where explicit consent is the general rule. However, both the GDPR, the Dutch GDPR Implementation Act and sectoral health legislation leave room for alternatives. I conclude that a further review of these alternatives is required to enhance scientific health research with the secondary use of health data, and I sketch a few avenues for further exploration.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW LAW-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Jewish Studies (EJJS) is the Journal of the European Association for Jewish Studies (EAJS). Its main purpose is to publish high-quality research articles, essays and shorter contributions on all aspects of Jewish Studies. Submissions are all double blind peer-reviewed. Additionally, EJJS seeks to inform its readers on current developments in Jewish Studies: it carries comprehensive review-essays on specific topics, trends and debated questions, as well as regular book-reviews. A further section carries reports on conferences, symposia, and descriptions of research projects in every area of Jewish Studies.