{"title":"网状雾化器吸入药物剂量预测。","authors":"Yu-Chung Hsu, Hsin-Hsien Li, Li-Chung Chiu, Wen-Chieh Chiang, Tien-Pei Fang, Hui-Ling Lin","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2022.0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The lung dose of nebulized drugs for spontaneous breathing is influenced by breathing patterns and nebulizer performance. This study aimed to develop a system for measuring breath patterns and a formula for estimating inhaled drugs, and then to validate the hypothesized prediction formula. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An <i>in vitro</i> model was first used to determine correlations among the delivered dose, breath patterns, and doses deposited on the accessories and reservoirs testing with a breathing simulator to generate 12 adult breathing patterns (<i>n</i> = 5). A pressure sensor was developed to measure breathing parameters and used along with a prediction formula that accounted for the initial charge dose, respiratory pattern, and dose on the accessory and reservoir of a nebulizer. Three brands of nebulizers were tested by placing salbutamol (5.0 mg/2.5 mL) in the drug holding chamber. Ten healthy individuals participated in the <i>ex vivo</i> study to validate the prediction formula. The agreement between the predicted and inhaled doses was analyzed using the Bland-Altman plot. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The <i>in vitro</i> model showed that the inspiratory time to total respiratory cycle time (<i>T<sub>i</sub></i>/<i>T</i><sub>total</sub>; %) was significantly directly correlated with the delivered dose among the respiratory factors, followed by inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, and tidal volume. The <i>ex vivo</i> model showed that <i>T<sub>i</sub></i>/<i>T</i><sub>total</sub> was significantly directly correlated with the delivered dose among the respiratory factors, in addition to the nebulization time and accessory dose. The Bland-Altman plots for the <i>ex vivo</i> model showed similar results between the two methods. Large differences in inhaled dose measured at the mouth were observed among the subjects, ranging from 12.68% to 21.68%; however, the difference between the predicted dose and inhaled dose was lower, at 3.98%-5.02%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The inhaled drug dose could be predicted with the hypothesized estimation formula, which was validated by the agreement between the inhaled and predicted doses of breathing patterns of healthy individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":"36 4","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Inhaled Drug Dose Generated by Mesh Nebulizers.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Chung Hsu, Hsin-Hsien Li, Li-Chung Chiu, Wen-Chieh Chiang, Tien-Pei Fang, Hui-Ling Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jamp.2022.0055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The lung dose of nebulized drugs for spontaneous breathing is influenced by breathing patterns and nebulizer performance. This study aimed to develop a system for measuring breath patterns and a formula for estimating inhaled drugs, and then to validate the hypothesized prediction formula. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An <i>in vitro</i> model was first used to determine correlations among the delivered dose, breath patterns, and doses deposited on the accessories and reservoirs testing with a breathing simulator to generate 12 adult breathing patterns (<i>n</i> = 5). A pressure sensor was developed to measure breathing parameters and used along with a prediction formula that accounted for the initial charge dose, respiratory pattern, and dose on the accessory and reservoir of a nebulizer. Three brands of nebulizers were tested by placing salbutamol (5.0 mg/2.5 mL) in the drug holding chamber. Ten healthy individuals participated in the <i>ex vivo</i> study to validate the prediction formula. The agreement between the predicted and inhaled doses was analyzed using the Bland-Altman plot. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The <i>in vitro</i> model showed that the inspiratory time to total respiratory cycle time (<i>T<sub>i</sub></i>/<i>T</i><sub>total</sub>; %) was significantly directly correlated with the delivered dose among the respiratory factors, followed by inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, and tidal volume. The <i>ex vivo</i> model showed that <i>T<sub>i</sub></i>/<i>T</i><sub>total</sub> was significantly directly correlated with the delivered dose among the respiratory factors, in addition to the nebulization time and accessory dose. The Bland-Altman plots for the <i>ex vivo</i> model showed similar results between the two methods. Large differences in inhaled dose measured at the mouth were observed among the subjects, ranging from 12.68% to 21.68%; however, the difference between the predicted dose and inhaled dose was lower, at 3.98%-5.02%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The inhaled drug dose could be predicted with the hypothesized estimation formula, which was validated by the agreement between the inhaled and predicted doses of breathing patterns of healthy individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"162-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2022.0055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2022.0055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting Inhaled Drug Dose Generated by Mesh Nebulizers.
Background: The lung dose of nebulized drugs for spontaneous breathing is influenced by breathing patterns and nebulizer performance. This study aimed to develop a system for measuring breath patterns and a formula for estimating inhaled drugs, and then to validate the hypothesized prediction formula. Methods: An in vitro model was first used to determine correlations among the delivered dose, breath patterns, and doses deposited on the accessories and reservoirs testing with a breathing simulator to generate 12 adult breathing patterns (n = 5). A pressure sensor was developed to measure breathing parameters and used along with a prediction formula that accounted for the initial charge dose, respiratory pattern, and dose on the accessory and reservoir of a nebulizer. Three brands of nebulizers were tested by placing salbutamol (5.0 mg/2.5 mL) in the drug holding chamber. Ten healthy individuals participated in the ex vivo study to validate the prediction formula. The agreement between the predicted and inhaled doses was analyzed using the Bland-Altman plot. Results: The in vitro model showed that the inspiratory time to total respiratory cycle time (Ti/Ttotal; %) was significantly directly correlated with the delivered dose among the respiratory factors, followed by inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, and tidal volume. The ex vivo model showed that Ti/Ttotal was significantly directly correlated with the delivered dose among the respiratory factors, in addition to the nebulization time and accessory dose. The Bland-Altman plots for the ex vivo model showed similar results between the two methods. Large differences in inhaled dose measured at the mouth were observed among the subjects, ranging from 12.68% to 21.68%; however, the difference between the predicted dose and inhaled dose was lower, at 3.98%-5.02%. Conclusions: The inhaled drug dose could be predicted with the hypothesized estimation formula, which was validated by the agreement between the inhaled and predicted doses of breathing patterns of healthy individuals.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes:
Pulmonary drug delivery
Airway reactivity and asthma treatment
Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract
Toxic effects of inhaled agents
Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.