孕产妇体重差异趋势:2012年至2019年明尼苏达州农村和城市居民的全州差异

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rebecca L. Emery Tavernier PhD , Marcia B. McCoy MPH , Catherine A. McCarty PhD, MPH, HEC-C , Susan M. Mason PhD, MPH
{"title":"孕产妇体重差异趋势:2012年至2019年明尼苏达州农村和城市居民的全州差异","authors":"Rebecca L. Emery Tavernier PhD ,&nbsp;Marcia B. McCoy MPH ,&nbsp;Catherine A. McCarty PhD, MPH, HEC-C ,&nbsp;Susan M. Mason PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Despite research showing substantial weight disparities along the rural–urban continuum, little work has attempted to identify differences in prepregnancy weight status or </span>gestational weight gain<span> (GWG) outcomes between rural and urban birthing people. As such, the goals of this research were to 1) document the prevalence of prepregnancy overweight and obesity and excessive GWG in rural and urban birthing people and 2) examine changes in rural and urban prepregnancy overweight or obesity and excessive GWG over time.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Birth certificate data provided sociodemographic variables, prepregnancy body mass index<span>, GWG, and rurality status on 465,709 respondents who gave birth in Minnesota from 2012 to 2019. A series of regression models estimated risk differences in 1) prepregnancy weight status and 2) excessive GWG between rural and urban respondents over time, controlling for relevant covariates.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Rural individuals had a 4.9 percentage-point (95% confidence interval, 4.5–5.3) higher risk of having prepregnancy overweight or obesity compared with urban individuals, and a 2.6 percentage-point (95% confidence interval, 1.9–3.3) higher risk of gaining excessive gestational weight. The disparities in prepregnancy overweight or obesity and excessive gestational weight between rural and urban individuals widened over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>These findings contribute to accumulating evidence documenting notable health disparities between rural and urban individuals during the </span>perinatal period<span> and support the need to develop prevention and treatment efforts focused on improving the weight-related health of individuals living in rural communities.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"33 6","pages":"Pages 636-642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Maternal Weight Disparities: Statewide Differences in Rural and Urban Minnesota Residents From 2012 to 2019\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L. Emery Tavernier PhD ,&nbsp;Marcia B. McCoy MPH ,&nbsp;Catherine A. McCarty PhD, MPH, HEC-C ,&nbsp;Susan M. Mason PhD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2023.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Despite research showing substantial weight disparities along the rural–urban continuum, little work has attempted to identify differences in prepregnancy weight status or </span>gestational weight gain<span> (GWG) outcomes between rural and urban birthing people. As such, the goals of this research were to 1) document the prevalence of prepregnancy overweight and obesity and excessive GWG in rural and urban birthing people and 2) examine changes in rural and urban prepregnancy overweight or obesity and excessive GWG over time.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Birth certificate data provided sociodemographic variables, prepregnancy body mass index<span>, GWG, and rurality status on 465,709 respondents who gave birth in Minnesota from 2012 to 2019. A series of regression models estimated risk differences in 1) prepregnancy weight status and 2) excessive GWG between rural and urban respondents over time, controlling for relevant covariates.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Rural individuals had a 4.9 percentage-point (95% confidence interval, 4.5–5.3) higher risk of having prepregnancy overweight or obesity compared with urban individuals, and a 2.6 percentage-point (95% confidence interval, 1.9–3.3) higher risk of gaining excessive gestational weight. The disparities in prepregnancy overweight or obesity and excessive gestational weight between rural and urban individuals widened over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p><span>These findings contribute to accumulating evidence documenting notable health disparities between rural and urban individuals during the </span>perinatal period<span> and support the need to develop prevention and treatment efforts focused on improving the weight-related health of individuals living in rural communities.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 636-642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001299\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001299","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管有研究显示城乡之间存在着巨大的体重差异,但很少有研究试图确定农村和城市分娩人群在孕前体重状况或妊娠期体重增加(GWG)结果方面的差异。因此,本研究的目标是1)记录农村和城市生育人群孕前超重、肥胖和过量GWG的流行情况;2)检查农村和城市孕前超重、肥胖和过量GWG随时间的变化。方法:出生证明数据提供了2012年至2019年在明尼苏达州分娩的465,709名受访者的社会人口统计学变量、孕前体重指数、GWG和农村状况。在控制相关协变量的情况下,一系列回归模型估计了农村和城市受访者在1)孕前体重状况和2)过量GWG随时间的风险差异。结果:农村个体孕前超重或肥胖的风险比城市个体高4.9个百分点(95%置信区间,4.5-5.3),妊娠体重过重的风险比城市个体高2.6个百分点(95%置信区间,1.9-3.3)。随着时间的推移,农村和城市个体在孕前超重或肥胖和妊娠体重过高方面的差异越来越大。结论:这些发现有助于积累证据,证明农村和城市个体在围产期之间存在显著的健康差异,并支持需要开展预防和治疗工作,重点改善生活在农村社区的个体的体重相关健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Maternal Weight Disparities: Statewide Differences in Rural and Urban Minnesota Residents From 2012 to 2019

Introduction

Despite research showing substantial weight disparities along the rural–urban continuum, little work has attempted to identify differences in prepregnancy weight status or gestational weight gain (GWG) outcomes between rural and urban birthing people. As such, the goals of this research were to 1) document the prevalence of prepregnancy overweight and obesity and excessive GWG in rural and urban birthing people and 2) examine changes in rural and urban prepregnancy overweight or obesity and excessive GWG over time.

Methods

Birth certificate data provided sociodemographic variables, prepregnancy body mass index, GWG, and rurality status on 465,709 respondents who gave birth in Minnesota from 2012 to 2019. A series of regression models estimated risk differences in 1) prepregnancy weight status and 2) excessive GWG between rural and urban respondents over time, controlling for relevant covariates.

Results

Rural individuals had a 4.9 percentage-point (95% confidence interval, 4.5–5.3) higher risk of having prepregnancy overweight or obesity compared with urban individuals, and a 2.6 percentage-point (95% confidence interval, 1.9–3.3) higher risk of gaining excessive gestational weight. The disparities in prepregnancy overweight or obesity and excessive gestational weight between rural and urban individuals widened over time.

Conclusions

These findings contribute to accumulating evidence documenting notable health disparities between rural and urban individuals during the perinatal period and support the need to develop prevention and treatment efforts focused on improving the weight-related health of individuals living in rural communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信