利用全生态系统变暖实验的长期数据,确定最佳春秋物候模型。

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2023-06-29 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1002/pei3.10118
Christina Schädel, Bijan Seyednasrollah, Paul J Hanson, Koen Hufkens, Kyle J Pearson, Jeffrey M Warren, Andrew D Richardson
{"title":"利用全生态系统变暖实验的长期数据,确定最佳春秋物候模型。","authors":"Christina Schädel, Bijan Seyednasrollah, Paul J Hanson, Koen Hufkens, Kyle J Pearson, Jeffrey M Warren, Andrew D Richardson","doi":"10.1002/pei3.10118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting vegetation phenology in response to changing environmental factors is key in understanding feedbacks between the biosphere and the climate system. Experimental approaches extending the temperature range beyond historic climate variability provide a unique opportunity to identify model structures that are best suited to predicting phenological changes under future climate scenarios. Here, we model spring and autumn phenological transition dates obtained from digital repeat photography in a boreal <i>Picea</i>-<i>Sphagnum</i> bog in response to a gradient of whole ecosystem warming manipulations of up to +9°C, using five years of observational data. In spring, seven equally best-performing models <i>for Larix</i> utilized the accumulation of growing degree days as a common driver for temperature forcing. For <i>Picea</i>, the best two models were sequential models requiring winter chilling before spring forcing temperature is accumulated. In shrub, parallel models with chilling and forcing requirements occurring simultaneously were identified as the best models. Autumn models were substantially improved when a CO<sub>2</sub> parameter was included. Overall, the combination of experimental manipulations and multiple years of observations combined with variation in weather provided the framework to rule out a large number of candidate models and to identify best spring and autumn models for each plant functional type.</p>","PeriodicalId":74457,"journal":{"name":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"4 4","pages":"188-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using long-term data from a whole ecosystem warming experiment to identify best spring and autumn phenology models.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Schädel, Bijan Seyednasrollah, Paul J Hanson, Koen Hufkens, Kyle J Pearson, Jeffrey M Warren, Andrew D Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pei3.10118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Predicting vegetation phenology in response to changing environmental factors is key in understanding feedbacks between the biosphere and the climate system. Experimental approaches extending the temperature range beyond historic climate variability provide a unique opportunity to identify model structures that are best suited to predicting phenological changes under future climate scenarios. Here, we model spring and autumn phenological transition dates obtained from digital repeat photography in a boreal <i>Picea</i>-<i>Sphagnum</i> bog in response to a gradient of whole ecosystem warming manipulations of up to +9°C, using five years of observational data. In spring, seven equally best-performing models <i>for Larix</i> utilized the accumulation of growing degree days as a common driver for temperature forcing. For <i>Picea</i>, the best two models were sequential models requiring winter chilling before spring forcing temperature is accumulated. In shrub, parallel models with chilling and forcing requirements occurring simultaneously were identified as the best models. Autumn models were substantially improved when a CO<sub>2</sub> parameter was included. Overall, the combination of experimental manipulations and multiple years of observations combined with variation in weather provided the framework to rule out a large number of candidate models and to identify best spring and autumn models for each plant functional type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"188-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423976/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测植被物候对环境因素变化的响应是了解生物圈与气候系统之间反馈的关键。将温度范围扩大到历史气候变异之外的实验方法为确定最适合预测未来气候情景下物候变化的模型结构提供了一个独特的机会。在这里,我们利用五年的观测数据,模拟了在北寒带冰杉-石炭藓沼泽中通过数字重复摄影获得的春季和秋季物候变化日期,以应对高达+9°C的整个生态系统变暖梯度。在春季,针对拉里克的七个同样表现最佳的模型利用生长度日的累积作为温度强迫的共同驱动因素。对于杉木,表现最好的两个模型是顺序模型,要求在累积春季强迫温度之前进行冬季冷冻。在灌木中,冷冻和强制要求同时发生的平行模型被认为是最佳模型。在加入二氧化碳参数后,秋季模型得到了显著改善。总之,实验操作和多年观测结果与天气变化相结合,为排除大量候选模型和确定每种植物功能类型的最佳春秋模型提供了框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using long-term data from a whole ecosystem warming experiment to identify best spring and autumn phenology models.

Using long-term data from a whole ecosystem warming experiment to identify best spring and autumn phenology models.

Using long-term data from a whole ecosystem warming experiment to identify best spring and autumn phenology models.

Using long-term data from a whole ecosystem warming experiment to identify best spring and autumn phenology models.

Predicting vegetation phenology in response to changing environmental factors is key in understanding feedbacks between the biosphere and the climate system. Experimental approaches extending the temperature range beyond historic climate variability provide a unique opportunity to identify model structures that are best suited to predicting phenological changes under future climate scenarios. Here, we model spring and autumn phenological transition dates obtained from digital repeat photography in a boreal Picea-Sphagnum bog in response to a gradient of whole ecosystem warming manipulations of up to +9°C, using five years of observational data. In spring, seven equally best-performing models for Larix utilized the accumulation of growing degree days as a common driver for temperature forcing. For Picea, the best two models were sequential models requiring winter chilling before spring forcing temperature is accumulated. In shrub, parallel models with chilling and forcing requirements occurring simultaneously were identified as the best models. Autumn models were substantially improved when a CO2 parameter was included. Overall, the combination of experimental manipulations and multiple years of observations combined with variation in weather provided the framework to rule out a large number of candidate models and to identify best spring and autumn models for each plant functional type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信