北马其顿共和国的腹腔镜供体肾切除术。

Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov, Sotir Stavridis, Sasho Dohchev, Maja Mojsova Mijovska, Aleksandra Petrusheva-Panovska, Aleksandar Trifunovski, Josif Janculev, Dimitar Trajkovski, Viktor Stankov, Marija Jovanovski Srceva, Nikola Brzanov
{"title":"北马其顿共和国的腹腔镜供体肾切除术。","authors":"Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov,&nbsp;Sotir Stavridis,&nbsp;Sasho Dohchev,&nbsp;Maja Mojsova Mijovska,&nbsp;Aleksandra Petrusheva-Panovska,&nbsp;Aleksandar Trifunovski,&nbsp;Josif Janculev,&nbsp;Dimitar Trajkovski,&nbsp;Viktor Stankov,&nbsp;Marija Jovanovski Srceva,&nbsp;Nikola Brzanov","doi":"10.2478/prilozi-2023-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has become the technique of choice for living donor kidney donations. Since 2018, 30 procedures have been performed at our clinic using this technique. The goal of this comparative analysis was to determine how surgical technique, specifically, hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy with hand assistance may affect early graft function when compared to open classical nephrectomy. <b>Material and methods</b>: Retrospective analyses were performed, comparing the two techniques of kidney donation. Kidney transplantation was performed with the open standard technique in both groups. The primary outcome was early graft function, and levels of urine output, and plasma creatinine were analyzed at three time points. A secondary outcome was the quality of the operative technique, which was determined by the time of warm ischemia, blood loss, and duration of surgery. Additionally, we noted all complications, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction. <b>Results</b>: In terms of warm ischemia time, there was no statistically significant difference between donors in both groups. It is important to note that in 2 recipients from Group II we did not observe diuresis at the conclusion of the operation. The recipients' diuresis was 515 ml ± 321SD in group I and 444 ml ± 271SD in group II. At 3, 12, and 36 hours postoperatively, there were statistically significant differences in the average serum creatinine values (p 0.05) in favor of group I. Similar results were observed in the second time measurement at 12 h and the third time measurement at 36 h for serum urea levels in recipients. The difference in serum urea values between the recipients in the groups at the first measurement (3h) following surgery was not statistically significant. <b>Conclusion</b>: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is recognized as a safe and effective treatment. Donors in this situation have a different profile from other surgical patients; hence, they do not undergo surgery due to their own medical condition but for an altruistic reason, and with hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy. Such patients receive all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The two main objectives of a donor nephrectomy are to give the recipient the best possible kidney and to ensure the donor's complete safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":74492,"journal":{"name":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","volume":"44 2","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in the Republic of North Macedonia.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov,&nbsp;Sotir Stavridis,&nbsp;Sasho Dohchev,&nbsp;Maja Mojsova Mijovska,&nbsp;Aleksandra Petrusheva-Panovska,&nbsp;Aleksandar Trifunovski,&nbsp;Josif Janculev,&nbsp;Dimitar Trajkovski,&nbsp;Viktor Stankov,&nbsp;Marija Jovanovski Srceva,&nbsp;Nikola Brzanov\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/prilozi-2023-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has become the technique of choice for living donor kidney donations. Since 2018, 30 procedures have been performed at our clinic using this technique. The goal of this comparative analysis was to determine how surgical technique, specifically, hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy with hand assistance may affect early graft function when compared to open classical nephrectomy. <b>Material and methods</b>: Retrospective analyses were performed, comparing the two techniques of kidney donation. Kidney transplantation was performed with the open standard technique in both groups. The primary outcome was early graft function, and levels of urine output, and plasma creatinine were analyzed at three time points. A secondary outcome was the quality of the operative technique, which was determined by the time of warm ischemia, blood loss, and duration of surgery. Additionally, we noted all complications, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction. <b>Results</b>: In terms of warm ischemia time, there was no statistically significant difference between donors in both groups. It is important to note that in 2 recipients from Group II we did not observe diuresis at the conclusion of the operation. The recipients' diuresis was 515 ml ± 321SD in group I and 444 ml ± 271SD in group II. At 3, 12, and 36 hours postoperatively, there were statistically significant differences in the average serum creatinine values (p 0.05) in favor of group I. Similar results were observed in the second time measurement at 12 h and the third time measurement at 36 h for serum urea levels in recipients. The difference in serum urea values between the recipients in the groups at the first measurement (3h) following surgery was not statistically significant. <b>Conclusion</b>: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is recognized as a safe and effective treatment. Donors in this situation have a different profile from other surgical patients; hence, they do not undergo surgery due to their own medical condition but for an altruistic reason, and with hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy. Such patients receive all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The two main objectives of a donor nephrectomy are to give the recipient the best possible kidney and to ensure the donor's complete safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"65-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2023-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2023-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:手辅助腹腔镜活体肾切除术已成为活体肾捐赠的首选技术。自2018年以来,我们的诊所已使用该技术进行了30例手术。本比较分析的目的是确定手术技术,特别是手辅助腹腔镜活体供肾切除术与开放式经典肾切除术相比,对早期移植物功能的影响。材料和方法:回顾性分析,比较两种肾捐献技术。两组均采用开放标准技术进行肾移植。主要终点是早期移植物功能,并在三个时间点分析尿量和血浆肌酐水平。次要结果是手术技术的质量,这是由热缺血时间、出血量和手术时间决定的。此外,我们还记录了所有并发症、住院时间和患者满意度。结果:两组大鼠热缺血时间比较,差异无统计学意义。值得注意的是,在II组的2例患者中,我们在手术结束时未观察到利尿。1组利尿515 ml±321SD, 2组利尿444 ml±271SD。术后3、12、36 h,两组患者血清肌酐平均值差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。第2次(12 h)和第3次(36 h)测定血清尿素水平,差异均有统计学意义。两组患者术后第一次测定(3h)血清尿素值差异无统计学意义。结论:手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术是一种安全有效的治疗方法。这种情况下的供体与其他手术患者的情况不同;因此,他们不是因为自己的身体状况而接受手术,而是出于利他的原因,并采用手辅助活体供体肾切除术。这样的患者可以获得微创手术的所有优点。供体肾切除术的两个主要目的是给接受者尽可能最好的肾脏和确保供体的完全安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in the Republic of North Macedonia.

Introduction: Hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has become the technique of choice for living donor kidney donations. Since 2018, 30 procedures have been performed at our clinic using this technique. The goal of this comparative analysis was to determine how surgical technique, specifically, hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy with hand assistance may affect early graft function when compared to open classical nephrectomy. Material and methods: Retrospective analyses were performed, comparing the two techniques of kidney donation. Kidney transplantation was performed with the open standard technique in both groups. The primary outcome was early graft function, and levels of urine output, and plasma creatinine were analyzed at three time points. A secondary outcome was the quality of the operative technique, which was determined by the time of warm ischemia, blood loss, and duration of surgery. Additionally, we noted all complications, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction. Results: In terms of warm ischemia time, there was no statistically significant difference between donors in both groups. It is important to note that in 2 recipients from Group II we did not observe diuresis at the conclusion of the operation. The recipients' diuresis was 515 ml ± 321SD in group I and 444 ml ± 271SD in group II. At 3, 12, and 36 hours postoperatively, there were statistically significant differences in the average serum creatinine values (p 0.05) in favor of group I. Similar results were observed in the second time measurement at 12 h and the third time measurement at 36 h for serum urea levels in recipients. The difference in serum urea values between the recipients in the groups at the first measurement (3h) following surgery was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is recognized as a safe and effective treatment. Donors in this situation have a different profile from other surgical patients; hence, they do not undergo surgery due to their own medical condition but for an altruistic reason, and with hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy. Such patients receive all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The two main objectives of a donor nephrectomy are to give the recipient the best possible kidney and to ensure the donor's complete safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信