使用心脏计算机断层扫描检测心脏淀粉样变性的稳健的基于放射组学的机器学习方法。

Francesca Lo Iacono, Riccardo Maragna, Gianluca Pontone, Valentina D A Corino
{"title":"使用心脏计算机断层扫描检测心脏淀粉样变性的稳健的基于放射组学的机器学习方法。","authors":"Francesca Lo Iacono,&nbsp;Riccardo Maragna,&nbsp;Gianluca Pontone,&nbsp;Valentina D A Corino","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2023.1193046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) shares similar clinical and imaging characteristics (e.g., hypertrophic phenotype) with aortic stenosis (AS), but its prognosis is generally worse than severe AS alone. Recent studies suggest that the presence of CA is frequent (1 out of 8 patients) in patients with severe AS. The coexistence of the two diseases complicates the prognosis and therapeutic management of both conditions. Thus, there is an urgent need to standardize and optimize the diagnostic process of CA and AS. The aim of this study is to develop a robust and reliable radiomics-based pipeline to differentiate the two pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients were included in the study, equally divided between CA and AS. For each patient, a cardiac computed tomography (CCT) was analyzed by extracting 107 radiomics features from the LV wall. Feature robustness was evaluated by means of geometrical transformations to the ROIs and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) computation. Various correlation thresholds (0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95, 1), feature selection methods [<i>p</i>-value, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), semi-supervised LASSO, principal component analysis (PCA), semi-supervised PCA, sequential forwards selection] and machine learning classifiers (k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, logistic regression and gradient boosting) were assessed using a leave-one-out cross-validation. Data augmentation was performed using the synthetic minority oversampling technique. Finally, explainability analysis was performed by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two radiomic features were selected as robust and used in the further steps. Best performances of classification were obtained using a correlation threshold of 0.95, PCA (keeping 95% of the variance, corresponding to 9 PCs) and support vector machine classifier reaching an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.93. Four PCs were found to be mainly dependent on textural features, two on first-order statistics and three on shape and size features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary results show that radiomics might be used as non-invasive tool able to differentiate CA from AS using clinical routine available images.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A robust radiomic-based machine learning approach to detect cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Lo Iacono,&nbsp;Riccardo Maragna,&nbsp;Gianluca Pontone,&nbsp;Valentina D A Corino\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fradi.2023.1193046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) shares similar clinical and imaging characteristics (e.g., hypertrophic phenotype) with aortic stenosis (AS), but its prognosis is generally worse than severe AS alone. Recent studies suggest that the presence of CA is frequent (1 out of 8 patients) in patients with severe AS. The coexistence of the two diseases complicates the prognosis and therapeutic management of both conditions. Thus, there is an urgent need to standardize and optimize the diagnostic process of CA and AS. The aim of this study is to develop a robust and reliable radiomics-based pipeline to differentiate the two pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients were included in the study, equally divided between CA and AS. For each patient, a cardiac computed tomography (CCT) was analyzed by extracting 107 radiomics features from the LV wall. Feature robustness was evaluated by means of geometrical transformations to the ROIs and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) computation. Various correlation thresholds (0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95, 1), feature selection methods [<i>p</i>-value, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), semi-supervised LASSO, principal component analysis (PCA), semi-supervised PCA, sequential forwards selection] and machine learning classifiers (k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, logistic regression and gradient boosting) were assessed using a leave-one-out cross-validation. Data augmentation was performed using the synthetic minority oversampling technique. Finally, explainability analysis was performed by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two radiomic features were selected as robust and used in the further steps. Best performances of classification were obtained using a correlation threshold of 0.95, PCA (keeping 95% of the variance, corresponding to 9 PCs) and support vector machine classifier reaching an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.93. Four PCs were found to be mainly dependent on textural features, two on first-order statistics and three on shape and size features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary results show that radiomics might be used as non-invasive tool able to differentiate CA from AS using clinical routine available images.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426499/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1193046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1193046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏淀粉样变性(CA)与主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)具有相似的临床和影像学特征(如肥厚表型),但其预后通常比单纯的严重AS差。最近的研究表明,严重AS患者中CA的存在是常见的(1 / 8)。这两种疾病的共存使两种疾病的预后和治疗管理复杂化。因此,迫切需要对CA和AS的诊断流程进行规范和优化。本研究的目的是建立一个稳健可靠的基于放射学的管道来区分这两种病理。方法:30例患者被纳入研究,平均分为CA和AS两组。对于每位患者,通过从左室壁提取107个放射组学特征来分析心脏计算机断层扫描(CCT)。通过对roi的几何变换和类内相关系数(ICC)计算来评估特征的鲁棒性。各种相关阈值(0.80,0.85,0.90,0.95,1),特征选择方法[p值,最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO),半监督LASSO,主成分分析(PCA),半监督PCA,顺序正向选择]和机器学习分类器(k-近邻,支持向量机,决策树,逻辑回归和梯度增强)使用遗漏交叉验证进行评估。采用合成少数派过采样技术进行数据增强。最后,采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法进行可解释性分析。结果:92个放射学特征被选择为鲁棒性特征,并用于下一步的步骤。相关阈值为0.95,PCA(保持95%的方差,对应9个pc)和支持向量机分类器的准确率、灵敏度和特异性均达到0.93,分类效果最佳。发现4个pc主要依赖于纹理特征,2个依赖于一阶统计量,3个依赖于形状和尺寸特征。结论:这些初步结果表明放射组学可以作为一种非侵入性工具,能够通过临床常规图像区分CA和as。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A robust radiomic-based machine learning approach to detect cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac computed tomography.

A robust radiomic-based machine learning approach to detect cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac computed tomography.

A robust radiomic-based machine learning approach to detect cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac computed tomography.

A robust radiomic-based machine learning approach to detect cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac computed tomography.

Introduction: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) shares similar clinical and imaging characteristics (e.g., hypertrophic phenotype) with aortic stenosis (AS), but its prognosis is generally worse than severe AS alone. Recent studies suggest that the presence of CA is frequent (1 out of 8 patients) in patients with severe AS. The coexistence of the two diseases complicates the prognosis and therapeutic management of both conditions. Thus, there is an urgent need to standardize and optimize the diagnostic process of CA and AS. The aim of this study is to develop a robust and reliable radiomics-based pipeline to differentiate the two pathologies.

Methods: Thirty patients were included in the study, equally divided between CA and AS. For each patient, a cardiac computed tomography (CCT) was analyzed by extracting 107 radiomics features from the LV wall. Feature robustness was evaluated by means of geometrical transformations to the ROIs and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) computation. Various correlation thresholds (0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95, 1), feature selection methods [p-value, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), semi-supervised LASSO, principal component analysis (PCA), semi-supervised PCA, sequential forwards selection] and machine learning classifiers (k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, logistic regression and gradient boosting) were assessed using a leave-one-out cross-validation. Data augmentation was performed using the synthetic minority oversampling technique. Finally, explainability analysis was performed by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.

Results: Ninety-two radiomic features were selected as robust and used in the further steps. Best performances of classification were obtained using a correlation threshold of 0.95, PCA (keeping 95% of the variance, corresponding to 9 PCs) and support vector machine classifier reaching an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.93. Four PCs were found to be mainly dependent on textural features, two on first-order statistics and three on shape and size features.

Conclusion: These preliminary results show that radiomics might be used as non-invasive tool able to differentiate CA from AS using clinical routine available images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信