{"title":"对有关性取向和性别认同的健康调查问题不作答复的背景影响。","authors":"Zhe Meredith Zhang, Madeline Smith-Johnson, Dmitry Tumin","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2022.0320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> We examined the relationship between state context and survey nonresponse to sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) questions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We obtained data from the 2014-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys. Item nonresponse was defined as selecting \"don't know/not sure\" or \"refused\" for each of two questions about SO and GI. Nonresponse patterns included responding to both SO and GI questions; responding only to the SO question (nonresponse to GI); responding only to the GI question (nonresponse to SO); and responding to neither question. State-level contextual measures included legal protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or other sexual or gender minority (LGBT+) people, LGBT+ social movement strength, and public opinion regarding LGBT+ issues. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The analysis included 1,459,525 respondents from 44 states (190 state-years). On weighted analysis, 96.5% of adults answered both SO/GI questions, 2.4% responded only to GI, 0.4% responded only to SO, and 0.7% responded to neither. The demographic profile of individuals with GI-only nonresponse differed markedly from the profile of adults with SO-only nonresponse. An increasingly favorable legal climate for LGBT+ people was associated with greater rates of response to SO and GI questions. However, a more LGBT+ friendly state climate measured by social movement strength or public opinion was not consistently associated with reduced SO and GI question nonresponse. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Contextual factors have mixed association with nonresponse to SO and GI question on BRFSS surveys. Our results warrant continued development of health survey questionnaires to elicit accurate information on respondents' SO and GI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextual Influences on Nonresponse to Health Survey Questions About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.\",\"authors\":\"Zhe Meredith Zhang, Madeline Smith-Johnson, Dmitry Tumin\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lgbt.2022.0320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> We examined the relationship between state context and survey nonresponse to sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) questions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We obtained data from the 2014-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys. Item nonresponse was defined as selecting \\\"don't know/not sure\\\" or \\\"refused\\\" for each of two questions about SO and GI. Nonresponse patterns included responding to both SO and GI questions; responding only to the SO question (nonresponse to GI); responding only to the GI question (nonresponse to SO); and responding to neither question. State-level contextual measures included legal protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or other sexual or gender minority (LGBT+) people, LGBT+ social movement strength, and public opinion regarding LGBT+ issues. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The analysis included 1,459,525 respondents from 44 states (190 state-years). On weighted analysis, 96.5% of adults answered both SO/GI questions, 2.4% responded only to GI, 0.4% responded only to SO, and 0.7% responded to neither. The demographic profile of individuals with GI-only nonresponse differed markedly from the profile of adults with SO-only nonresponse. An increasingly favorable legal climate for LGBT+ people was associated with greater rates of response to SO and GI questions. However, a more LGBT+ friendly state climate measured by social movement strength or public opinion was not consistently associated with reduced SO and GI question nonresponse. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Contextual factors have mixed association with nonresponse to SO and GI question on BRFSS surveys. Our results warrant continued development of health survey questionnaires to elicit accurate information on respondents' SO and GI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LGBT health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"66-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LGBT health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2022.0320\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2022.0320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们研究了国家背景与调查中性取向(SO)和性别认同(GI)问题无回复之间的关系。研究方法我们从 2014-2020 年行为风险因素监测系统 (BRFSS) 调查中获取数据。对于有关 SO 和 GI 的两个问题,每个问题的无回复定义为选择 "不知道/不确定 "或 "拒绝"。无响应模式包括同时回答 SO 和 GI 问题;只回答 SO 问题(不回答 GI 问题);只回答 GI 问题(不回答 SO 问题);以及两个问题都不回答。州级背景测量包括对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性者或其他性或性别少数群体(LGBT+)的法律保护、LGBT+ 社会运动的力量以及有关 LGBT+ 问题的公众舆论。分析结果分析包括来自 44 个州的 1,459,525 名受访者(190 个州-年)。经过加权分析,96.5% 的成年人同时回答了 SO/GI 问题,2.4% 的成年人只回答了 GI 问题,0.4% 的成年人只回答了 SO 问题,0.7% 的成年人两个问题都没有回答。只回答 GI 而不回答 SO 的成年人的人口统计学特征与只回答 SO 而不回答 SO 的成年人的人口统计学特征明显不同。对 LGBT+ 人士越来越有利的法律环境与更高的 SO 和 GI 问题回答率有关。然而,根据社会运动的强度或公众舆论来衡量的更有利于 LGBT+ 的国家环境与 SO 和 GI 问题未回复率的降低并不一致。结论:在 BRFSS 调查中,环境因素与 SO 和 GI 问题的无回复率有不同的关系。我们的研究结果证明,应继续开发健康调查问卷,以获得有关受访者 SO 和 GI 的准确信息。
Contextual Influences on Nonresponse to Health Survey Questions About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.
Purpose: We examined the relationship between state context and survey nonresponse to sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) questions. Methods: We obtained data from the 2014-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys. Item nonresponse was defined as selecting "don't know/not sure" or "refused" for each of two questions about SO and GI. Nonresponse patterns included responding to both SO and GI questions; responding only to the SO question (nonresponse to GI); responding only to the GI question (nonresponse to SO); and responding to neither question. State-level contextual measures included legal protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or other sexual or gender minority (LGBT+) people, LGBT+ social movement strength, and public opinion regarding LGBT+ issues. Results: The analysis included 1,459,525 respondents from 44 states (190 state-years). On weighted analysis, 96.5% of adults answered both SO/GI questions, 2.4% responded only to GI, 0.4% responded only to SO, and 0.7% responded to neither. The demographic profile of individuals with GI-only nonresponse differed markedly from the profile of adults with SO-only nonresponse. An increasingly favorable legal climate for LGBT+ people was associated with greater rates of response to SO and GI questions. However, a more LGBT+ friendly state climate measured by social movement strength or public opinion was not consistently associated with reduced SO and GI question nonresponse. Conclusion: Contextual factors have mixed association with nonresponse to SO and GI question on BRFSS surveys. Our results warrant continued development of health survey questionnaires to elicit accurate information on respondents' SO and GI.
LGBT healthPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍:
LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.