在接受治疗性血浆置换的住院患者中,大出血的发生率取决于出血的定义:受血者流行病学和捐献者评估研究-III》分析报告

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Alexandre Soares Ferreira Junior MBBS, Morgana Pinheiro Maux Lessa MBBS, Kate Sanborn MS, Maragatha Kuchibhatla PhD, Matthew S Karafin MD MSc, Oluwatoyosi A. Onwuemene MD MS
{"title":"在接受治疗性血浆置换的住院患者中,大出血的发生率取决于出血的定义:受血者流行病学和捐献者评估研究-III》分析报告","authors":"Alexandre Soares Ferreira Junior MBBS,&nbsp;Morgana Pinheiro Maux Lessa MBBS,&nbsp;Kate Sanborn MS,&nbsp;Maragatha Kuchibhatla PhD,&nbsp;Matthew S Karafin MD MSc,&nbsp;Oluwatoyosi A. Onwuemene MD MS","doi":"10.1002/jca.22080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Major bleeding in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been studied in large databases; but without standardizing bleeding definitions. Therefore, we used standardized definitions to evaluate major bleeding in hospitalized patients undergoing TPE using public use data files from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we identified TPE-treated adults in a first inpatient encounter. We evaluated major bleeding prevalence using (1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, (2) packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, or (3) hemoglobin (Hgb) decline. Patients with major bleeding prior to their first TPE were excluded from the analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 779 patients undergoing TPE, major bleeding by at least one of the three bleeding definitions occurred in 135 patients (17.3%). For each of the ICD/CPT, PRBC, and Hgb definitions, the prevalence of major bleeding was 2.8% (n = 31), 7.4% (n = 81), and 5.4% (n = 59), respectively. Only 3.7% of bleeds (5/135) were captured by all three definitions and 19.3% (26/135) exclusively by any two pairwise definitions. The addition of PRBC transfusion and Hgb decline to ICD/CPT code definitions increased bleeding prevalence threefold.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Among hospitalized adults undergoing TPE in the REDS-III study, the prevalence of major bleeding was 17.3%. The addition of PRBC and Hgb decline to ICD codes increased bleeding prevalence threefold. Future studies are needed to develop validated models that identify patients at risk for major bleeding during TPE.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"38 6","pages":"694-702"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In hospitalized patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange, major bleeding prevalence depends on the bleeding definition: An analysis of The Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Soares Ferreira Junior MBBS,&nbsp;Morgana Pinheiro Maux Lessa MBBS,&nbsp;Kate Sanborn MS,&nbsp;Maragatha Kuchibhatla PhD,&nbsp;Matthew S Karafin MD MSc,&nbsp;Oluwatoyosi A. Onwuemene MD MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jca.22080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Major bleeding in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been studied in large databases; but without standardizing bleeding definitions. Therefore, we used standardized definitions to evaluate major bleeding in hospitalized patients undergoing TPE using public use data files from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Design and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we identified TPE-treated adults in a first inpatient encounter. We evaluated major bleeding prevalence using (1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, (2) packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, or (3) hemoglobin (Hgb) decline. Patients with major bleeding prior to their first TPE were excluded from the analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 779 patients undergoing TPE, major bleeding by at least one of the three bleeding definitions occurred in 135 patients (17.3%). For each of the ICD/CPT, PRBC, and Hgb definitions, the prevalence of major bleeding was 2.8% (n = 31), 7.4% (n = 81), and 5.4% (n = 59), respectively. Only 3.7% of bleeds (5/135) were captured by all three definitions and 19.3% (26/135) exclusively by any two pairwise definitions. The addition of PRBC transfusion and Hgb decline to ICD/CPT code definitions increased bleeding prevalence threefold.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among hospitalized adults undergoing TPE in the REDS-III study, the prevalence of major bleeding was 17.3%. The addition of PRBC and Hgb decline to ICD codes increased bleeding prevalence threefold. Future studies are needed to develop validated models that identify patients at risk for major bleeding during TPE.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"694-702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在大型数据库中研究了接受治疗性血浆置换(TPE)的患者大出血;但是没有标准化流血的定义。因此,我们使用标准化定义来评估接受TPE的住院患者的大出血,使用来自受体流行病学和供体评估研究iii (red - iii)的公共使用数据文件。研究设计和方法在一项回顾性横断面分析中,我们确定了第一次住院患者接受tpe治疗的成年人。我们使用(1)国际疾病分类(ICD)或现行程序术语(CPT)代码评估大出血发生率,(2)填充红细胞(PRBC)输血,或(3)血红蛋白(Hgb)下降。在第一次TPE之前有大出血的患者被排除在分析之外。结果在779例TPE患者中,135例(17.3%)发生了三种出血定义中至少一种的大出血。对于每种ICD/CPT、PRBC和Hgb定义,大出血的患病率分别为2.8% (n = 31)、7.4% (n = 81)和5.4% (n = 59)。只有3.7%的出血(5/135)被所有三种定义捕获,19.3%(26/135)被任何两种定义完全捕获。在ICD/CPT代码定义中加入PRBC输血和Hgb下降使出血发生率增加了三倍。结论在red - iii研究中接受TPE的住院成人中,大出血的发生率为17.3%。在ICD编码中增加PRBC和Hgb下降使出血发生率增加了三倍。未来的研究需要建立有效的模型,以确定TPE期间有大出血风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In hospitalized patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange, major bleeding prevalence depends on the bleeding definition: An analysis of The Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III

Background

Major bleeding in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been studied in large databases; but without standardizing bleeding definitions. Therefore, we used standardized definitions to evaluate major bleeding in hospitalized patients undergoing TPE using public use data files from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III (REDS-III).

Study Design and Methods

In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we identified TPE-treated adults in a first inpatient encounter. We evaluated major bleeding prevalence using (1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, (2) packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, or (3) hemoglobin (Hgb) decline. Patients with major bleeding prior to their first TPE were excluded from the analysis.

Results

Among 779 patients undergoing TPE, major bleeding by at least one of the three bleeding definitions occurred in 135 patients (17.3%). For each of the ICD/CPT, PRBC, and Hgb definitions, the prevalence of major bleeding was 2.8% (n = 31), 7.4% (n = 81), and 5.4% (n = 59), respectively. Only 3.7% of bleeds (5/135) were captured by all three definitions and 19.3% (26/135) exclusively by any two pairwise definitions. The addition of PRBC transfusion and Hgb decline to ICD/CPT code definitions increased bleeding prevalence threefold.

Conclusion

Among hospitalized adults undergoing TPE in the REDS-III study, the prevalence of major bleeding was 17.3%. The addition of PRBC and Hgb decline to ICD codes increased bleeding prevalence threefold. Future studies are needed to develop validated models that identify patients at risk for major bleeding during TPE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信