Aging effects on extrapersonal (far-space) attention: cancellation and line bisection performance from 179 healthy adults.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1080/13825585.2023.2223903
Helen Morse, Amy A Jolly, Hannah Browning, Allan Clark, Valerie Pomeroy, Stéphanie Rossit
{"title":"Aging effects on extrapersonal (far-space) attention: cancellation and line bisection performance from 179 healthy adults.","authors":"Helen Morse, Amy A Jolly, Hannah Browning, Allan Clark, Valerie Pomeroy, Stéphanie Rossit","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2023.2223903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessment of cognitive impairments is a vital part of clinical practice. Cancellation (visual search) and line bisection are commonly used tasks to assess visuospatial attention. Despite the fact visuospatial attention is engaged in both near (within reach) and far-space (out of reach), most studies have been conducted in near-space alone. Moreover, despite their use in clinical practice, it is unclear whether cancellation and bisection tasks are related. Here, we investigated the impact of aging on cancellation and line bisection performance in far-space in a large healthy sample. We provide preliminary age-graded norms for assessing visuospatial attention in far-space calculated from a sample of 179 healthy adults, between the ages of 18-94 (<i>mean age</i> = 49.29). Cancellation and line bisection were presented on a large screen in far-space and completed using a wireless remote. Aging was accompanied by longer task duration for both tasks, slower search speed and poorer quality of search. However, there was no significant effect of aging on line bisection error. There was a significant correlation between the two tasks in that longer task duration in line bisection was associated with slower search speed and poorer quality of search. Overall, participants presented a leftward bias during cancellation and line bisection akin to pseudoneglect. Moreover, we found that irrespective of age, search speed was faster in males than females. We offer novel evidence that performance on cancellation and line bisection tasks are related to one another in far-space, but are also sensitive to age-related decline, and even sex differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2023.2223903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of cognitive impairments is a vital part of clinical practice. Cancellation (visual search) and line bisection are commonly used tasks to assess visuospatial attention. Despite the fact visuospatial attention is engaged in both near (within reach) and far-space (out of reach), most studies have been conducted in near-space alone. Moreover, despite their use in clinical practice, it is unclear whether cancellation and bisection tasks are related. Here, we investigated the impact of aging on cancellation and line bisection performance in far-space in a large healthy sample. We provide preliminary age-graded norms for assessing visuospatial attention in far-space calculated from a sample of 179 healthy adults, between the ages of 18-94 (mean age = 49.29). Cancellation and line bisection were presented on a large screen in far-space and completed using a wireless remote. Aging was accompanied by longer task duration for both tasks, slower search speed and poorer quality of search. However, there was no significant effect of aging on line bisection error. There was a significant correlation between the two tasks in that longer task duration in line bisection was associated with slower search speed and poorer quality of search. Overall, participants presented a leftward bias during cancellation and line bisection akin to pseudoneglect. Moreover, we found that irrespective of age, search speed was faster in males than females. We offer novel evidence that performance on cancellation and line bisection tasks are related to one another in far-space, but are also sensitive to age-related decline, and even sex differences.

衰老对人外(远空间)注意力的影响:179 名健康成年人的取消和线段分割表现。
认知障碍评估是临床实践的重要组成部分。消除(视觉搜索)和线段分割是评估视觉空间注意力的常用任务。尽管视觉空间注意力同时涉及近空间(可触及范围内)和远空间(可触及范围外),但大多数研究仅针对近空间进行。此外,尽管在临床实践中也有使用,但取消任务和一分为二任务是否相关尚不清楚。在此,我们以大量健康样本为研究对象,调查了衰老对远距消除和线段分割能力的影响。我们提供了评估远空间视觉空间注意力的初步年龄分级标准,这些标准是从 179 名年龄在 18-94 岁之间(平均年龄 = 49.29 岁)的健康成年人样本中计算得出的。在远空间的大屏幕上显示消隐和线段分割,并使用无线遥控器完成。随着年龄的增长,这两项任务的持续时间会延长,搜索速度会减慢,搜索质量会降低。然而,衰老对线段划分错误没有明显影响。这两项任务之间存在着明显的相关性,即线段划分任务持续时间越长,搜索速度越慢,搜索质量越差。总的来说,被试在取消任务和线段二分法中出现了类似于假性忽略的向左偏差。此外,我们还发现,无论年龄大小,男性的搜索速度都比女性快。我们提供的新证据表明,在远空间中,取消任务和线段分割任务的表现是相互关联的,但也对与年龄相关的衰退甚至性别差异很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信