The anatomy of COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs: Exploring their nomological network on a nationally representative sample

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Goran Knežević, Ljiljana B. Lazarević, Ljiljana Mihić, Milica Pejović Milovančević, Zorica Terzić, Oliver Tošković, Olivera Vuković, Jovana Todorović, Nađa P. Marić
{"title":"The anatomy of COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs: Exploring their nomological network on a nationally representative sample","authors":"Goran Knežević,&nbsp;Ljiljana B. Lazarević,&nbsp;Ljiljana Mihić,&nbsp;Milica Pejović Milovančević,&nbsp;Zorica Terzić,&nbsp;Oliver Tošković,&nbsp;Olivera Vuković,&nbsp;Jovana Todorović,&nbsp;Nađa P. Marić","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic was followed by the widespread proliferation of conspiracy beliefs (CBs) regarding the origin and harmfulness of the virus and a high level of hesitancy to vaccinate. We aimed to test a series of hypotheses on the correlates of CBs and vaccination, including socio-demographic factors, personality dispositions, somatic health, stressful experiences during pandemics, and psychological distress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The sample (<i>N</i> = 1203), was based on a multistage probabilistic household sampling representative of the general population. The subjects were randomly split into two approximately equal subgroups, enabling cross-validation. Based on the findings in the exploratory, the SEM model was tested in the confirmatory subsample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The correlates of CBs were Disintegration (proneness to psychotic-like experiences), low Openness, lower education, Extraversion, living in a smaller settlement and being employed. The correlates of vaccination were older age, CBs and larger places of living. Evidence on the role of stressful experiences and psychological distress in CBs/vaccination was not found. The findings of moderately strong and robust (cross-validated) paths, leading from Disintegration to CBs and from CBs to vaccination were the most important ones.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Conspiratorial thinking tendencies—related to health-related behaviour such as vaccination—appear to be, to a considerable extent, manifestations of the mechanisms that are part of our stable, broad, trait-like thinking/emotional/motivational/behavioural tendencies, primarily proneness to psychotic-like experiences &amp; behaviours.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12431","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic was followed by the widespread proliferation of conspiracy beliefs (CBs) regarding the origin and harmfulness of the virus and a high level of hesitancy to vaccinate. We aimed to test a series of hypotheses on the correlates of CBs and vaccination, including socio-demographic factors, personality dispositions, somatic health, stressful experiences during pandemics, and psychological distress.

Method

The sample (N = 1203), was based on a multistage probabilistic household sampling representative of the general population. The subjects were randomly split into two approximately equal subgroups, enabling cross-validation. Based on the findings in the exploratory, the SEM model was tested in the confirmatory subsample.

Results

The correlates of CBs were Disintegration (proneness to psychotic-like experiences), low Openness, lower education, Extraversion, living in a smaller settlement and being employed. The correlates of vaccination were older age, CBs and larger places of living. Evidence on the role of stressful experiences and psychological distress in CBs/vaccination was not found. The findings of moderately strong and robust (cross-validated) paths, leading from Disintegration to CBs and from CBs to vaccination were the most important ones.

Discussion

Conspiratorial thinking tendencies—related to health-related behaviour such as vaccination—appear to be, to a considerable extent, manifestations of the mechanisms that are part of our stable, broad, trait-like thinking/emotional/motivational/behavioural tendencies, primarily proneness to psychotic-like experiences & behaviours.

剖析与covid -19相关的阴谋信念:在全国代表性样本上探索其法理学网络
目的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行爆发后,关于病毒起源和危害的阴谋论(CBs)广泛传播,对接种疫苗的态度高度犹豫。我们的目的是测试一系列关于CBs和疫苗接种相关性的假设,包括社会人口因素、人格倾向、躯体健康、大流行期间的压力经历和心理困扰。方法采用具有一般人口代表性的多阶段概率家庭抽样方法,抽取样本1203例。受试者被随机分成两个大致相等的亚组,以便交叉验证。基于探索性的发现,SEM模型在验证子样本中进行了测试。结果与CBs相关的因素有:崩解(倾向于精神病样经历)、开放性低、受教育程度低、外向性、居住小区小和就业。与疫苗接种相关的是年龄较大,CBs和较大的居住地。没有发现关于应激经历和心理困扰在CBs/疫苗接种中的作用的证据。从解体到CBs和从CBs到疫苗接种的中等强度和稳健(交叉验证)路径的发现是最重要的。阴谋论思维倾向——与健康相关的行为,如接种疫苗——似乎在很大程度上是我们稳定的、广泛的、类似特质的思维/情感/动机/行为倾向的一部分机制的表现,主要倾向于类似精神病的经历。行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信