Sarcopenia assessed by total psoas index - is it correlated with post-operative complications in all digestive cancers?

Q2 Medicine
Carmen Haiducu, Catalin Adrian Buzea, Caterina Delcea, Vladislav Brasoveanu, Cristian Mugur Grasu, Gheorghe-Andrei Dan
{"title":"Sarcopenia assessed by total psoas index - is it correlated with post-operative complications in all digestive cancers?","authors":"Carmen Haiducu,&nbsp;Catalin Adrian Buzea,&nbsp;Caterina Delcea,&nbsp;Vladislav Brasoveanu,&nbsp;Cristian Mugur Grasu,&nbsp;Gheorghe-Andrei Dan","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>In cancer patients sarcopenia may be a predictor for postoperative complications of curative or palliative surgery. Several indices including the total psoas area index (TPAI) are proposed for the diagnosis of this condition, but there is no validated cut-off point.Our study aimed to assess the role of TPAI as a marker for sarcopenia and to compare the utility of previously proposed cut-off values for predicting post-operative complications in patients with digestive cancers undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included all adult patients with digestive cancers admitted to a tertiary center for elective surgery between January and December 2019. Sarcopenia was considered based on TPAI evaluated on abdominal computed tomography (CT) and for analysis we used different cut-off points published by various authors. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of any complications as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification. The secondary endpoints were fistula development, low- versus high-grade Clavien-Dindo post-operative complications, moderate or severe anemia at discharge, major bleeding, hypoalbuminemia at discharge, and decrease in albumin levels by at least 1g/dL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 155 patients with a mean age of 64.78 ± 11.40 years, of which 59.35% were males; 58.06% developed postoperative complications. TPAI evaluated as a continuous variable was not a predictor for the development of post-operative complications neither in the general study sample, nor in the gender subgroups of patients. Sarcopenia defined by previously proposed cut-off values was not a predictor of the secondary end-points either.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPAI as a sole parameter for defining sarcopenia was not a predictor for postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for digestive neoplasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":"96 3","pages":"274-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/12/cm-96-274.PMC10419683.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: In cancer patients sarcopenia may be a predictor for postoperative complications of curative or palliative surgery. Several indices including the total psoas area index (TPAI) are proposed for the diagnosis of this condition, but there is no validated cut-off point.Our study aimed to assess the role of TPAI as a marker for sarcopenia and to compare the utility of previously proposed cut-off values for predicting post-operative complications in patients with digestive cancers undergoing surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively included all adult patients with digestive cancers admitted to a tertiary center for elective surgery between January and December 2019. Sarcopenia was considered based on TPAI evaluated on abdominal computed tomography (CT) and for analysis we used different cut-off points published by various authors. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of any complications as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification. The secondary endpoints were fistula development, low- versus high-grade Clavien-Dindo post-operative complications, moderate or severe anemia at discharge, major bleeding, hypoalbuminemia at discharge, and decrease in albumin levels by at least 1g/dL.

Results: We included 155 patients with a mean age of 64.78 ± 11.40 years, of which 59.35% were males; 58.06% developed postoperative complications. TPAI evaluated as a continuous variable was not a predictor for the development of post-operative complications neither in the general study sample, nor in the gender subgroups of patients. Sarcopenia defined by previously proposed cut-off values was not a predictor of the secondary end-points either.

Conclusion: TPAI as a sole parameter for defining sarcopenia was not a predictor for postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for digestive neoplasia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用总腰肌指数评估肌肉减少症——是否与所有消化系统癌症的术后并发症相关?
背景和目的:癌症患者肌肉减少症可能是治疗性或姑息性手术术后并发症的预测指标。包括腰大肌总面积指数(TPAI)在内的几个指标被提出用于诊断这种情况,但没有有效的分界点。我们的研究旨在评估TPAI作为肌肉减少症标志物的作用,并比较先前提出的临界值在预测消化道癌症手术患者术后并发症方面的效用。方法:我们回顾性地纳入了2019年1月至12月在三级中心接受择期手术的所有成年消化癌患者。根据腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)评估的TPAI来考虑肌肉减少症,为了进行分析,我们使用了不同作者发表的不同分界点。主要终点是根据Clavien-Dindo分类确定的任何并发症的发生。次要终点为瘘管发生、低级别与高级别Clavien-Dindo术后并发症、出院时中度或重度贫血、大出血、出院时低白蛋白血症和白蛋白水平至少降低1g/dL。结果:155例患者入组,平均年龄64.78±11.40岁,男性占59.35%;58.06%出现术后并发症。TPAI作为一个连续变量评估,无论是在一般研究样本中,还是在患者的性别亚组中,都不是术后并发症发生的预测因子。先前提出的临界值定义的肌肉减少症也不是次要终点的预测因子。结论:TPAI作为定义肌肉减少症的唯一参数并不能预测消化系统肿瘤手术患者的术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信