Sex differences in the subjective and reinforcing effects of smoked cannabis

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Stephanie Lake, Margaret Haney, Ziva D. Cooper
{"title":"Sex differences in the subjective and reinforcing effects of smoked cannabis","authors":"Stephanie Lake,&nbsp;Margaret Haney,&nbsp;Ziva D. Cooper","doi":"10.1111/adb.13301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Preclinical studies have shown sex-based differences in the reinforcing effects of cannabinoid 1 receptor agonists such as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). This study sought to test whether these sex differences translate to humans by assessing the subjective and reinforcing effects of smoked cannabis in male and female volunteers. We pooled data (<i>n</i> = 68; 55M, 13F) from two within-subject randomized controlled trials of healthy, ≥weekly cannabis users comparing the subjective and reinforcing effects of smoked active (~25 mg THC) versus placebo cannabis (0-mg THC). Subjective ratings of drug effects and mood were measured using visual analogue scales, and reinforcing effects were measured with a cannabis self-administration task. Sex-dependent outcomes were explored using generalized linear mixed models. Under active cannabis conditions, female participants reported greater reductions from baseline in cannabis craving and significantly higher cannabis-specific ratings of strength, liking, willingness to take again and good effect, compared with males (interaction <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Placebo and active cannabis were self-administered by 22% and 36% of male participants, respectively, and by 15% and 54% of female participants, respectively. Receipt of active cannabis significantly increased likelihood of self-administration (<i>p</i> = 0.011), but a sex difference was not detected (<i>p</i> = 0.176). Although females were more sensitive to certain positive subjective effects of active cannabis, they were not more likely than males to self-administer it. These findings highlight the need to test sex differences as a primary objective in experimental studies and may shed light on accelerated trajectories from initiation to cannabis use disorder observed among women.</p>","PeriodicalId":7289,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Biology","volume":"28 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adb.13301","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adb.13301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Preclinical studies have shown sex-based differences in the reinforcing effects of cannabinoid 1 receptor agonists such as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). This study sought to test whether these sex differences translate to humans by assessing the subjective and reinforcing effects of smoked cannabis in male and female volunteers. We pooled data (n = 68; 55M, 13F) from two within-subject randomized controlled trials of healthy, ≥weekly cannabis users comparing the subjective and reinforcing effects of smoked active (~25 mg THC) versus placebo cannabis (0-mg THC). Subjective ratings of drug effects and mood were measured using visual analogue scales, and reinforcing effects were measured with a cannabis self-administration task. Sex-dependent outcomes were explored using generalized linear mixed models. Under active cannabis conditions, female participants reported greater reductions from baseline in cannabis craving and significantly higher cannabis-specific ratings of strength, liking, willingness to take again and good effect, compared with males (interaction p < 0.05). Placebo and active cannabis were self-administered by 22% and 36% of male participants, respectively, and by 15% and 54% of female participants, respectively. Receipt of active cannabis significantly increased likelihood of self-administration (p = 0.011), but a sex difference was not detected (p = 0.176). Although females were more sensitive to certain positive subjective effects of active cannabis, they were not more likely than males to self-administer it. These findings highlight the need to test sex differences as a primary objective in experimental studies and may shed light on accelerated trajectories from initiation to cannabis use disorder observed among women.

Abstract Image

吸食大麻的主观和强化效应的性别差异
临床前研究表明,大麻素1受体激动剂(如δ -9-四氢大麻酚(THC))的强化作用存在性别差异。这项研究试图通过评估吸食大麻对男性和女性志愿者的主观和强化影响,来测试这些性别差异是否会转化为人类。我们汇总了数据(n = 68;55M, 13F),来自两项健康的、≥每周大麻使用者的受试者内随机对照试验,比较了吸烟活性大麻(~25 mg THC)与安慰剂大麻(0 mg THC)的主观和强化效应。使用视觉模拟量表测量药物效果和情绪的主观评分,并通过大麻自我给药任务测量强化效果。使用广义线性混合模型探讨性别相关的结果。在活跃的大麻条件下,与男性相比,女性参与者对大麻的渴望比基线减少得更多,并且在强度、喜欢程度、再次吸食意愿和良好效果方面的大麻特异性评分明显更高(相互作用p < 0.05)。安慰剂和活性大麻分别由22%和36%的男性参与者以及15%和54%的女性参与者自行服用。接受活性大麻显著增加了自我给药的可能性(p = 0.011),但没有发现性别差异(p = 0.176)。虽然女性对活性大麻的某些积极的主观影响更敏感,但她们并不比男性更有可能自我管理。这些发现突出表明,有必要将性别差异作为实验研究的主要目标,并可能阐明在妇女中观察到的从开始到大麻使用障碍的加速轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Biology
Addiction Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Biology is focused on neuroscience contributions and it aims to advance our understanding of the action of drugs of abuse and addictive processes. Papers are accepted in both animal experimentation or clinical research. The content is geared towards behavioral, molecular, genetic, biochemical, neuro-biological and pharmacology aspects of these fields. Addiction Biology includes peer-reviewed original research reports and reviews. Addiction Biology is published on behalf of the Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and other Drugs (SSA). Members of the Society for the Study of Addiction receive the Journal as part of their annual membership subscription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信