Jia-Arng Lee MD, MSc, Mei-Hwa Lin BS, Chun-Min Kang MD, Ming-Kai Chuang MD, Chi Kwan Boris Fung MD, Shyh-Chyi Lo MD, PhD
{"title":"A validation and modification of PLASMIC score by adjusting the criteria of mean corpuscular volume and international normalized ratio","authors":"Jia-Arng Lee MD, MSc, Mei-Hwa Lin BS, Chun-Min Kang MD, Ming-Kai Chuang MD, Chi Kwan Boris Fung MD, Shyh-Chyi Lo MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jca.22068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The PLASMIC score was developed for distinguishing thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) from other types of thrombotic microangiopathy. However, two components of the PLASMIC score, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and international normalized ratio (INR), showed non-significant differences between TTP and non-TTP patients in previous validations. Here, we validate the PLASMIC score and aim to modify it by adjusting the criteria of MCV and INR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective validation of suspected TTP patients was performed by reviewing electronic medical records from two medical centers in Taiwan. The performance of different modified types of the PLASMIC score was carried out.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 50 patients included in the final analysis, 12 were diagnosed with TTP based on deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity and clinical judgement. When stratified by high (score ≥ 6) and low-intermediate risk (score < 6), the positive predictive value (PPV) of the PLASMIC score to predict TTP was 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.61). The area under curve (AUC) was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.56-0.82). When adjusting the criteria of the PLASMIC score from MCV < 90 fL to MCV ≥ 90 fL, the PPV increased to 0.57 (95% CI: 0.37-0.75). The AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.61-0.87). When adjusting the INR from >1.5 to >1.1, the PPV increased to 0.56 (95% CI: 0.39-0.71). The AUC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68-0.90).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>MCV ≥ 90 fL and/or INR > 1.1 might be suitable modifications for PLASMIC score but should be validated in a larger sample size.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"38 5","pages":"582-589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The PLASMIC score was developed for distinguishing thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) from other types of thrombotic microangiopathy. However, two components of the PLASMIC score, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and international normalized ratio (INR), showed non-significant differences between TTP and non-TTP patients in previous validations. Here, we validate the PLASMIC score and aim to modify it by adjusting the criteria of MCV and INR.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective validation of suspected TTP patients was performed by reviewing electronic medical records from two medical centers in Taiwan. The performance of different modified types of the PLASMIC score was carried out.
Results
Among 50 patients included in the final analysis, 12 were diagnosed with TTP based on deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity and clinical judgement. When stratified by high (score ≥ 6) and low-intermediate risk (score < 6), the positive predictive value (PPV) of the PLASMIC score to predict TTP was 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.61). The area under curve (AUC) was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.56-0.82). When adjusting the criteria of the PLASMIC score from MCV < 90 fL to MCV ≥ 90 fL, the PPV increased to 0.57 (95% CI: 0.37-0.75). The AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.61-0.87). When adjusting the INR from >1.5 to >1.1, the PPV increased to 0.56 (95% CI: 0.39-0.71). The AUC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68-0.90).
Conclusion
MCV ≥ 90 fL and/or INR > 1.1 might be suitable modifications for PLASMIC score but should be validated in a larger sample size.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.