Tactile misfit detection ability at the implant-abutment interface of internal connection dental implants: an in-vitro study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-15 DOI:10.1080/00016357.2023.2223715
Pedro Molinero-Mourelle, Lukas Peter, Ana Sol Gaviria, Manrique Fonseca, Martin Schimmel, Joannis Katsoulis
{"title":"Tactile misfit detection ability at the implant-abutment interface of internal connection dental implants: an in-vitro study.","authors":"Pedro Molinero-Mourelle,&nbsp;Lukas Peter,&nbsp;Ana Sol Gaviria,&nbsp;Manrique Fonseca,&nbsp;Martin Schimmel,&nbsp;Joannis Katsoulis","doi":"10.1080/00016357.2023.2223715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this <i>in-vitro</i> study was to investigate the tactile assessment ability at the implant impression-taking stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty clinicians (18 novices, 12 experts) were included for a tactile fit assessment by using a used/new probe (tip diameter 100 µm/20 µm). Six implant replicas and related impression copings of two internal connection implant systems were used, each with a perfect fit (0 µm) and defined vertical micro gaps of 8, 24, 55, 110 and 220 µm at the interface. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive methods and non-parametric tests with a focus on specificity (ability to detect perfect fit), sensitivity (ability to detect misfit), and predictive values. P-values <5% were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tactile assessment showed a mean total sensitivity for the Straumann and Nobel Biocare systems of 83% and 80% with a used probe, and 91% and 92% with a new probe, respectively. The mean total specificities were 33% and 20% with a used probe and 17% and 3% with a new probe, respectively. No statistical significance was observed between novice and expert clinicians concerning their tactile assessment ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ability to detect a perfect fit (specificity) with a probe was very poor for both implant systems and impaired with the use of a new probe. The use of a new probe improved the gap detection ability (sensitivity) significantly at the expense of the specificity. A combination of additional chairside techniques with training and calibration could improve clinicians' ability to correctly assess the fit/misfit at the implant-abutment interface.</p>","PeriodicalId":7313,"journal":{"name":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2023.2223715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this in-vitro study was to investigate the tactile assessment ability at the implant impression-taking stage.

Methods: Thirty clinicians (18 novices, 12 experts) were included for a tactile fit assessment by using a used/new probe (tip diameter 100 µm/20 µm). Six implant replicas and related impression copings of two internal connection implant systems were used, each with a perfect fit (0 µm) and defined vertical micro gaps of 8, 24, 55, 110 and 220 µm at the interface. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive methods and non-parametric tests with a focus on specificity (ability to detect perfect fit), sensitivity (ability to detect misfit), and predictive values. P-values <5% were considered statistically significant.

Results: The tactile assessment showed a mean total sensitivity for the Straumann and Nobel Biocare systems of 83% and 80% with a used probe, and 91% and 92% with a new probe, respectively. The mean total specificities were 33% and 20% with a used probe and 17% and 3% with a new probe, respectively. No statistical significance was observed between novice and expert clinicians concerning their tactile assessment ability.

Conclusions: The ability to detect a perfect fit (specificity) with a probe was very poor for both implant systems and impaired with the use of a new probe. The use of a new probe improved the gap detection ability (sensitivity) significantly at the expense of the specificity. A combination of additional chairside techniques with training and calibration could improve clinicians' ability to correctly assess the fit/misfit at the implant-abutment interface.

内连接牙种植体种植体-基牙界面的触觉错配检测能力:一项体外研究。
目的:本体外研究的目的是研究植入物印模阶段的触觉评估能力。方法:30名临床医生(18名新手,12名专家)通过使用旧的/新的探针(尖端直径100 µm/20 µm)。使用了六个植入物复制品和两个内部连接植入物系统的相关印模复制品,每个系统都非常适合(0 µm),并定义了8、24、55、110和220的垂直微间隙 µm。使用描述性方法和非参数检验进行统计分析,重点关注特异性(检测完美拟合的能力)、敏感性(检测不匹配的能力)和预测值。P值结果:触觉评估显示,Straumann和Nobel Biocare系统在使用过的探针时的平均总灵敏度分别为83%和80%,在使用新探针时分别为91%和92%。使用过的探针的平均总特异性分别为33%和20%,使用新探针的平均特异性分别为17%和3%。新手和专家临床医生在触觉评估能力方面没有观察到统计学意义。结论:对于两种植入系统来说,用探针检测完美配合(特异性)的能力都很差,并且使用新探针会受损。新探针的使用以牺牲特异性为代价显著提高了间隙检测能力(灵敏度)。将额外的椅旁技术与培训和校准相结合,可以提高临床医生正确评估种植体-基牙界面适合/不适合的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes papers conveying new knowledge within all areas of oral health and disease sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信