Clinical application of a real-time polymerase chain reaction test for CYP2C19 genotyping based on genotype distribution in a healthy Korean population.

Kuenyoul Park, Soo Jin Yoo
{"title":"Clinical application of a real-time polymerase chain reaction test for CYP2C19 genotyping based on genotype distribution in a healthy Korean population.","authors":"Kuenyoul Park, Soo Jin Yoo","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With the recent reports of additional alleles of the CYP2C19 gene with decreased or no function, the clinical utility of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based testing that detects only a small number of variant targets needs to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 7-year data for real-time PCR test records from a single hospital and analyzed CYP2C19 genotypes from publicly available whole-genome or whole-exome data from a healthy Korean population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2327 test results in this hospital, the *1 allele was most common (60.5%), followed by *2 (28.0%), *3 (10.1%), and *17 (1.4%). Among 5305 healthy Korean individuals, the frequencies of the *2, *3, and *17 alleles were 28.6%, 9.9%, and 1.0%, respectively, which were not statistically different from those of the hospital data (P = .4439, P = .6025, and P = .1142, respectively). Interestingly, the total frequency of additional nonfunctional alleles (*4, *6, *22, and *24) that could not be detected using real-time PCR was only 0.1%, with a total allele count of 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that the clinical utility of real-time PCR for CYP2C19 genotyping remains satisfactory. However, caution should be exercised because the test can miss patients with decreased CYP2C19 function.</p>","PeriodicalId":17951,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"234-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: With the recent reports of additional alleles of the CYP2C19 gene with decreased or no function, the clinical utility of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based testing that detects only a small number of variant targets needs to be evaluated.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed 7-year data for real-time PCR test records from a single hospital and analyzed CYP2C19 genotypes from publicly available whole-genome or whole-exome data from a healthy Korean population.

Results: Of the 2327 test results in this hospital, the *1 allele was most common (60.5%), followed by *2 (28.0%), *3 (10.1%), and *17 (1.4%). Among 5305 healthy Korean individuals, the frequencies of the *2, *3, and *17 alleles were 28.6%, 9.9%, and 1.0%, respectively, which were not statistically different from those of the hospital data (P = .4439, P = .6025, and P = .1142, respectively). Interestingly, the total frequency of additional nonfunctional alleles (*4, *6, *22, and *24) that could not be detected using real-time PCR was only 0.1%, with a total allele count of 8.

Conclusion: Our study shows that the clinical utility of real-time PCR for CYP2C19 genotyping remains satisfactory. However, caution should be exercised because the test can miss patients with decreased CYP2C19 function.

基于韩国健康人群基因型分布的 CYP2C19 基因分型实时聚合酶链反应检验的临床应用。
目的:最近有报道称CYP2C19基因中存在功能减弱或无功能的额外等位基因,基于实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测只能检测少量变异靶点,其临床实用性需要评估:方法:我们回顾性地查看了一家医院7年来的实时PCR检测记录数据,并分析了来自韩国健康人群的公开全基因组或全外显子组数据中的CYP2C19基因型:在该医院的2327份检测结果中,*1等位基因最常见(60.5%),其次是*2(28.0%)、*3(10.1%)和*17(1.4%)。在 5305 名健康的韩国人中,*2、*3 和 *17 等位基因的频率分别为 28.6%、9.9% 和 1.0%,与医院数据无统计学差异(P = .4439、P = .6025 和 P = .1142)。有趣的是,使用实时 PCR 检测不到的其他非功能等位基因(*4、*6、*22 和 *24)的总频率仅为 0.1%,等位基因总数为 8.0%:我们的研究表明,实时 PCR 对 CYP2C19 基因分型的临床实用性仍然令人满意。结论:我们的研究表明,实时 PCR 对 CYP2C19 基因分型的临床应用仍然令人满意,但应谨慎行事,因为该检测可能会漏检 CYP2C19 功能减退的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信