An understanding of falling bodies across schooling and experience based on the conceptual prevalence framework.

Patrice Potvin, Pierre Chastenay, François Thibault, Martin Riopel, Emmanuel Ahr, Lorie-Marlène Brault Foisy
{"title":"An understanding of falling bodies across schooling and experience based on the conceptual prevalence framework.","authors":"Patrice Potvin,&nbsp;Pierre Chastenay,&nbsp;François Thibault,&nbsp;Martin Riopel,&nbsp;Emmanuel Ahr,&nbsp;Lorie-Marlène Brault Foisy","doi":"10.1186/s43031-023-00075-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we describe a study conducted online with 953 participants of varying levels of education and, when applicable, science/physics teaching experience. These participants were asked to solve a cognitive task in which many different pairs of objects were presented and to identify which, if any, would touch the ground first when dropped (in atmospheric or non-atmospheric environments). Recorded accuracies and response times allowed us to conduct an analysis based on the conceptual prevalence framework, which posits that the coexistence of conceptual and/or <i>misconceptual</i> resources can produce interference in response production. The results show that the influence of some of them decreases or, more surprisingly, increases with training. In fact, secondary and college physics teachers seem to cultivate some of them, and most likely have contributed to their spread. The implications for teaching and research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72822,"journal":{"name":"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00075-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we describe a study conducted online with 953 participants of varying levels of education and, when applicable, science/physics teaching experience. These participants were asked to solve a cognitive task in which many different pairs of objects were presented and to identify which, if any, would touch the ground first when dropped (in atmospheric or non-atmospheric environments). Recorded accuracies and response times allowed us to conduct an analysis based on the conceptual prevalence framework, which posits that the coexistence of conceptual and/or misconceptual resources can produce interference in response production. The results show that the influence of some of them decreases or, more surprisingly, increases with training. In fact, secondary and college physics teachers seem to cultivate some of them, and most likely have contributed to their spread. The implications for teaching and research are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于概念流行框架的对学校教育和经历中跌倒身体的理解。
在这篇文章中,我们描述了一项由953名不同教育水平的参与者在线进行的研究,如果适用,还包括科学/物理教学经验。这些参与者被要求解决一项认知任务,在该任务中,呈现了许多不同的物体对,并确定哪些物体(如果有的话)在掉落时会首先触地(在大气或非大气环境中)。记录的准确性和响应时间使我们能够根据概念流行率框架进行分析,该框架假设概念和/或错误概念资源的共存会对响应产生干扰。结果表明,随着训练的进行,他们中的一些人的影响会减少,或者更令人惊讶的是,会增加。事实上,中学和大学物理老师似乎培养了其中的一些,并且很可能促成了它们的传播。讨论了对教学和研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信