The Costs and Benefits of Mindfulness and Reappraisal in Daily Life

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Mario Wenzel, Elisabeth S. Blanke, Zarah Rowland, Annette Brose
{"title":"The Costs and Benefits of Mindfulness and Reappraisal in Daily Life","authors":"Mario Wenzel,&nbsp;Elisabeth S. Blanke,&nbsp;Zarah Rowland,&nbsp;Annette Brose","doi":"10.1007/s42761-022-00178-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>Reappraisal and mindfulness represent two fundamentally different but interconnected ways of dealing with one’s emotions: whereas reappraisal is aimed at changing one’s thoughts and emotions, mindfulness is aimed at <i>not</i> immediately changing, but appreciating them. Despite this difference, prior research has shown that both are beneficial for one’s affective well-being. However, research on the spontaneous use of reappraisal and mindfulness in daily life found that they might be differentially associated with positive and negative affect, with reappraisal and mindful attention being more strongly associated with increased positive affect and mindful acceptance with decreased negative affect. Moreover, the spontaneous use of reappraisal may be less effective than mindfulness in daily life given that it is more cognitively taxing. To compare these possibly different benefits (i.e., change in positive and negative affect) and costs (i.e., feeling depleted), we re-analyzed two experience sampling studies (<i>N</i> = 125 and <i>N</i> = 179). Regarding benefits, endorsing reappraisal and mindful attention was significantly associated with increases in positive affect, whereas endorsing mindful acceptance was significantly associated with decreases in negative affect. Regarding costs, we found that endorsing reappraisal led to more depletion and that reappraisal was selected less often than mindfulness in daily life. Our results demonstrate the importance of assessing not only the different benefits but also the costs of emotion regulation in daily life.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-022-00178-7.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-022-00178-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract

Reappraisal and mindfulness represent two fundamentally different but interconnected ways of dealing with one’s emotions: whereas reappraisal is aimed at changing one’s thoughts and emotions, mindfulness is aimed at not immediately changing, but appreciating them. Despite this difference, prior research has shown that both are beneficial for one’s affective well-being. However, research on the spontaneous use of reappraisal and mindfulness in daily life found that they might be differentially associated with positive and negative affect, with reappraisal and mindful attention being more strongly associated with increased positive affect and mindful acceptance with decreased negative affect. Moreover, the spontaneous use of reappraisal may be less effective than mindfulness in daily life given that it is more cognitively taxing. To compare these possibly different benefits (i.e., change in positive and negative affect) and costs (i.e., feeling depleted), we re-analyzed two experience sampling studies (N = 125 and N = 179). Regarding benefits, endorsing reappraisal and mindful attention was significantly associated with increases in positive affect, whereas endorsing mindful acceptance was significantly associated with decreases in negative affect. Regarding costs, we found that endorsing reappraisal led to more depletion and that reappraisal was selected less often than mindfulness in daily life. Our results demonstrate the importance of assessing not only the different benefits but also the costs of emotion regulation in daily life.

日常生活中正念和重新评价的成本和收益。
重新评价和正念代表了两种截然不同但相互关联的处理情绪的方式:重新评价的目的是改变一个人的想法和情绪,而正念的目的不是立即改变,而是欣赏它们。尽管存在这种差异,但先前的研究表明,两者都有利于一个人的情感幸福。然而,对日常生活中自发使用重新评价和正念的研究发现,它们可能与积极情感和消极情感有不同的联系,重新评价和注意与积极情感的增加和注意接受与消极情感的减少有更强烈的联系。此外,在日常生活中,自发使用重新评估可能不如正念有效,因为它在认知上更费力。为了比较这些可能不同的好处(即积极和消极影响的变化)和成本(即感觉枯竭),我们重新分析了两项经验抽样研究(N = 125和N = 179)。关于益处,认可重新评估和注意与积极情感的增加显著相关,而认可注意接受与消极情感的减少显著相关。关于成本,我们发现认可重新评估会导致更多的消耗,而且在日常生活中,重新评估的选择频率低于正念。我们的研究结果表明,不仅要评估日常生活中情绪调节的不同益处,还要评估其成本。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,请访问10.1007/s42761-022-00178-7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信