Evaluation of continuous wound infusion with local analgesics in postoperative renal transplantation patients: A retrospective study.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-17 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_130_22
Muaath Khaled Alshuaibi, Abdulghani Khogeer, Hamed Ambusaidi, Charles Mazeaud, Clement Larose, Pierre Lecoanet, Isabelle Urmès, Francois Lagrange, Jean-Louis Lemelle, Anthony Manuguerra, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Jacques Hubert, Pascal Eschwège
{"title":"Evaluation of continuous wound infusion with local analgesics in postoperative renal transplantation patients: A retrospective study.","authors":"Muaath Khaled Alshuaibi,&nbsp;Abdulghani Khogeer,&nbsp;Hamed Ambusaidi,&nbsp;Charles Mazeaud,&nbsp;Clement Larose,&nbsp;Pierre Lecoanet,&nbsp;Isabelle Urmès,&nbsp;Francois Lagrange,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Lemelle,&nbsp;Anthony Manuguerra,&nbsp;Thomas Fuchs-Buder,&nbsp;Jacques Hubert,&nbsp;Pascal Eschwège","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_130_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of the continuous wound infusion (CWI) with Ropivacaine (naropeine 2 mg/ml) on postoperative pain, analgesics consumption, and bowel function in renal transplantation patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study trial including 79 patients who underwent renal transplantation. Patients were separated into two groups (catheter or without catheter). We identified 52 (65.8%) patients who received catheter wound infusion during the first 48 h postoperatively. On the other hand, 27 (34.1%) patients received standard without catheter anesthetic technique. Catheter wound infusion was achieved through a 12 cm catheter, inserted subcutaneously after abdominal closure. The catheter was placed above the external oblique aponeurosis. All postoperative data were examined to evaluate the first postoperative 48 h. This study aims to assess three variables: postoperative pain analysis through a visual analog scale, analgesics consumption, and bowel function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall score of the three variables was studied. Regarding pain assessment, we have determined that the group of patients with catheter scored better than patients without catheter with borderline significance (66.3 vs. 61.2 consecutively; <i>P</i> = 0.0843). An early bowel function was noted in patients with catheters on the 2<sup>nd</sup> postoperative day (<i>P</i> = 0.0209). Moreover, patients without catheter consumed more painkillers with nonsignificant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.2499).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with catheter showed earlier bowel function than the noncatheter group on the 2<sup>nd</sup> postoperative day. The catheter group had better pain evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"15 2","pages":"211-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/e3/UA-15-211.PMC10252789.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_130_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of the continuous wound infusion (CWI) with Ropivacaine (naropeine 2 mg/ml) on postoperative pain, analgesics consumption, and bowel function in renal transplantation patients.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study trial including 79 patients who underwent renal transplantation. Patients were separated into two groups (catheter or without catheter). We identified 52 (65.8%) patients who received catheter wound infusion during the first 48 h postoperatively. On the other hand, 27 (34.1%) patients received standard without catheter anesthetic technique. Catheter wound infusion was achieved through a 12 cm catheter, inserted subcutaneously after abdominal closure. The catheter was placed above the external oblique aponeurosis. All postoperative data were examined to evaluate the first postoperative 48 h. This study aims to assess three variables: postoperative pain analysis through a visual analog scale, analgesics consumption, and bowel function.

Results: The overall score of the three variables was studied. Regarding pain assessment, we have determined that the group of patients with catheter scored better than patients without catheter with borderline significance (66.3 vs. 61.2 consecutively; P = 0.0843). An early bowel function was noted in patients with catheters on the 2nd postoperative day (P = 0.0209). Moreover, patients without catheter consumed more painkillers with nonsignificant difference (P = 0.2499).

Conclusion: Patients with catheter showed earlier bowel function than the noncatheter group on the 2nd postoperative day. The catheter group had better pain evaluation.

肾移植术后伤口持续输注局部镇痛药的评价:一项回顾性研究。
目的:评价罗哌卡因(2 mg/ml)持续伤口输注(CWI)对肾移植患者术后疼痛、镇痛药消耗和肠功能的疗效。材料和方法:一项回顾性研究试验,包括79例接受肾移植的患者。将患者分为两组(导管组或无导管组)。我们确定了52名(65.8%)患者在术后前48小时内接受了导管伤口输液。另一方面,27名(34.1%)患者接受了标准的无导管麻醉技术。导管伤口输注是通过一根12厘米的导管实现的,在腹部闭合后皮下插入。导管放置在外斜肌筋膜上方。对所有术后数据进行检查,以评估术后第一个48小时。本研究旨在评估三个变量:通过视觉模拟量表进行的术后疼痛分析、止痛药消耗和肠功能。结果:研究了三个变量的总分。关于疼痛评估,我们已经确定,有导管的患者组得分高于没有导管的患者,具有临界显著性(连续66.3对61.2;P=0.0843)。术后第2天,有导管患者出现早期肠功能(P=0.0209)。此外,结论:术后第2天,有导管的患者比无导管的患者更早出现排便功能。导管组的疼痛评估较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信