Correction to Ryum et al. (2023).

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1037/pst0000496
{"title":"Correction to Ryum et al. (2023).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pst0000496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"Integrating between-session homework in psychotherapy: A systematic review of immediate in-session and intermediate outcomes\" by Truls Ryum, Mia Bennion and Nikolaos Kazantzis (<i>Psychotherapy</i>, Advanced Online Publication, Apr 27, 2023, np). In the article (https://doi.org/10.1037/ pst0000488), the number of included studies in Figure 2 omitted two studies that were added to the literature synthesis. Therefore, the following has been added to the Reports excluded box in Figure 2: A further two studies were added to the research synthesis by author knowledge. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-66181-001.) This article reviews the evidence for between-session homework (BSH) in individual psychotherapy. Whereas previous reviews have demonstrated a positive association between-client compliance with BSH and distal treatment outcomes; here, we pay particular attention to therapist behaviors that may promote client engagement with BSH assessed as immediate (in-session) and intermediate (session-to-session) outcomes, and moderators of these effects. For our systematic review, we identified 25 studies with 1,304 clients and 118 therapists, mostly on cognitive behavioral therapy such as exposure-based treatments with depression and anxiety disorders. A box score approach was utilized to summarize findings. Results for immediate outcomes were mixed but neutral. Results for intermediate outcomes were positive. Presenting a convincing rationale, being flexible in collaboratively designing, planning, and reviewing homework tasks in accordance with the clients' goals, aligning BSH with the clients' takeaways from the session and providing a written summary of homework and rationale, are some therapist behaviors that can promote client engagement with BSH. We conclude with research limitations, training implications, and therapeutic practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports an error in "Integrating between-session homework in psychotherapy: A systematic review of immediate in-session and intermediate outcomes" by Truls Ryum, Mia Bennion and Nikolaos Kazantzis (Psychotherapy, Advanced Online Publication, Apr 27, 2023, np). In the article (https://doi.org/10.1037/ pst0000488), the number of included studies in Figure 2 omitted two studies that were added to the literature synthesis. Therefore, the following has been added to the Reports excluded box in Figure 2: A further two studies were added to the research synthesis by author knowledge. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-66181-001.) This article reviews the evidence for between-session homework (BSH) in individual psychotherapy. Whereas previous reviews have demonstrated a positive association between-client compliance with BSH and distal treatment outcomes; here, we pay particular attention to therapist behaviors that may promote client engagement with BSH assessed as immediate (in-session) and intermediate (session-to-session) outcomes, and moderators of these effects. For our systematic review, we identified 25 studies with 1,304 clients and 118 therapists, mostly on cognitive behavioral therapy such as exposure-based treatments with depression and anxiety disorders. A box score approach was utilized to summarize findings. Results for immediate outcomes were mixed but neutral. Results for intermediate outcomes were positive. Presenting a convincing rationale, being flexible in collaboratively designing, planning, and reviewing homework tasks in accordance with the clients' goals, aligning BSH with the clients' takeaways from the session and providing a written summary of homework and rationale, are some therapist behaviors that can promote client engagement with BSH. We conclude with research limitations, training implications, and therapeutic practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

对Ryum等人(2023)的更正。
Truls Ryum, Mia Bennion和Nikolaos Kazantzis在《心理治疗中整合治疗间作业:对治疗中即时和中期结果的系统回顾》(《心理治疗》,高级在线出版物,2023年4月27日)中报告了一个错误。在文章(https://doi.org/10.1037/ pst0000488)中,图2中纳入的研究数量省略了两项加入文献综合的研究。因此,在图2的报告排除框中增加了以下内容:根据作者的知识,在研究综合中又增加了两项研究。本文的所有版本都已更正。(以下是原文摘要,见记录2023-66181-001。)本文回顾了治疗间隙作业在个体心理治疗中的证据。鉴于先前的综述已经证明患者对BSH的依从性与远端治疗结果呈正相关;在这里,我们特别关注治疗师的行为,这些行为可能会促进客户参与BSH,评估为即时(治疗中)和中期(治疗间)结果,以及这些效果的调节因子。在我们的系统回顾中,我们确定了25项研究,涉及1304名客户和118名治疗师,主要是认知行为疗法,如抑郁症和焦虑症的暴露治疗。采用box score方法总结研究结果。直接结果的结果好坏参半,但中性。中期结果为阳性。提出一个令人信服的理由,灵活地根据来访者的目标设计、计划和审查家庭作业任务,使BSH与来访者从会议中得到的结论保持一致,并提供家庭作业和理由的书面总结,这些都是可以促进来访者参与BSH的治疗师行为。我们总结了研究的局限性、训练意义和治疗实践。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信