Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000529484
Betul Celik, Gamze Kavas
{"title":"Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.","authors":"Betul Celik,&nbsp;Gamze Kavas","doi":"10.1159/000529484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare performance of individual categories between the Johns Hopkins template and the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of patients with bladder biopsy and relevant cytology slides were obtained from archived material. Slides were reclassified according to Johns Hopkins template and the Paris system. Results were compared to histological diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BD SurePath preparations from 205 cases with biopsy follow-up (118 benign, 5 dysplasia, 23 low, and 59 malignant urothelial carcinoma [UC]) were reviewed. There were 2 inadequate specimens in each system. According to the Johns Hopkins template, there were 96 (46.8%) no urothelial atypia or malignancy, 37 (18%) atypical urothelial cells of uncertain significance (AUC-US), 21 (10.2%) atypical urothelial cells, cannot exclude high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), 38 (18.5%) HGUC, and 11 (5.4%) low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LGUC). The Paris system categorized 111 (54.1%) negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma, 29 (14.1%) atypical urothelial cells (AUCs), 25 (12.2%) suspicious for HGUC (SHGUC), 36 (17.6%) HGUC, and 2 (1%) LGUC. The Johns Hopkins template had a sensitivity of 95.6%, specificity of 73.6%, positive predictive value of 61.5%, negative predictive value of 96.3, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 79.8%. The Paris System had a sensitivity of 93.6%, specificity of 77.9%, positive predictive value of 65.6%, negative predictive value of 96.5, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 82.8%. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for atypical category (AUC-US/AUC) in the Johns Hopkins template was 43.2%, while it has been 24.1% for the Paris System. The ROM for suspicious category was 47.6% and 68.0%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between negative and atypical, suspicious, and HGUC categories in each system (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discrete negative or benign urine cytology had the same sensitivity and specificity between two systems. Although atypical category was associated with a higher ROM with the Hopkins template, the ROM for the suspicious category yielded better result with the Paris system.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":"67 4","pages":"425-433"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare performance of individual categories between the Johns Hopkins template and the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology.

Methods: Medical records of patients with bladder biopsy and relevant cytology slides were obtained from archived material. Slides were reclassified according to Johns Hopkins template and the Paris system. Results were compared to histological diagnoses.

Results: BD SurePath preparations from 205 cases with biopsy follow-up (118 benign, 5 dysplasia, 23 low, and 59 malignant urothelial carcinoma [UC]) were reviewed. There were 2 inadequate specimens in each system. According to the Johns Hopkins template, there were 96 (46.8%) no urothelial atypia or malignancy, 37 (18%) atypical urothelial cells of uncertain significance (AUC-US), 21 (10.2%) atypical urothelial cells, cannot exclude high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), 38 (18.5%) HGUC, and 11 (5.4%) low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LGUC). The Paris system categorized 111 (54.1%) negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma, 29 (14.1%) atypical urothelial cells (AUCs), 25 (12.2%) suspicious for HGUC (SHGUC), 36 (17.6%) HGUC, and 2 (1%) LGUC. The Johns Hopkins template had a sensitivity of 95.6%, specificity of 73.6%, positive predictive value of 61.5%, negative predictive value of 96.3, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 79.8%. The Paris System had a sensitivity of 93.6%, specificity of 77.9%, positive predictive value of 65.6%, negative predictive value of 96.5, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 82.8%. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for atypical category (AUC-US/AUC) in the Johns Hopkins template was 43.2%, while it has been 24.1% for the Paris System. The ROM for suspicious category was 47.6% and 68.0%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between negative and atypical, suspicious, and HGUC categories in each system (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Discrete negative or benign urine cytology had the same sensitivity and specificity between two systems. Although atypical category was associated with a higher ROM with the Hopkins template, the ROM for the suspicious category yielded better result with the Paris system.

约翰霍普金斯模板的非典型类别比巴黎系统有更高的恶性风险,但巴黎系统更适用于可疑类别。
简介:本研究的目的是比较约翰霍普金斯模板和巴黎系统在报告泌尿细胞学方面的单个类别的表现。方法:从档案资料中获取膀胱活检患者病历及相关细胞学切片。根据约翰霍普金斯大学的模板和巴黎系统对幻灯片进行重新分类。结果与组织学诊断比较。结果:我们回顾了205例活检随访患者的BD SurePath制剂(118例良性,5例非典型增生,23例恶性,59例恶性尿路上皮癌[UC])。每个系统有2个样本不足。根据Johns Hopkins的模板,96例(46.8%)没有尿路上皮异型或恶性,37例(18%)不确定意义的非典型尿路上皮细胞(AUC-US), 21例(10.2%)非典型尿路上皮细胞,不能排除高级别尿路上皮癌(HGUC), 38例(18.5%)HGUC, 11例(5.4%)低级别尿路上皮癌(LGUC)。Paris系统将111例(54.1%)为高级别尿路上皮癌阴性,29例(14.1%)为非典型尿路上皮细胞(AUCs), 25例(12.2%)为可疑HGUC (SHGUC), 36例(17.6%)HGUC, 2例(1%)LGUC。Johns Hopkins模板的敏感性为95.6%,特异性为73.6%,阳性预测值为61.5%,阴性预测值为96.3,总体诊断准确率为79.8%。Paris系统的敏感性为93.6%,特异性为77.9%,阳性预测值为65.6%,阴性预测值为96.5,总体诊断准确率为82.8%。在约翰霍普金斯模板中,非典型分类(AUC- us /AUC)的恶性肿瘤(ROM)风险为43.2%,而在巴黎系统中为24.1%。可疑类别的ROM分别为47.6%和68.0%。各系统阴性与非典型、可疑、HGUC分类差异有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。结论:离散阴性或良性尿细胞学在两种系统之间具有相同的敏感性和特异性。虽然非典型类别与霍普金斯模板的较高ROM相关,但可疑类别的ROM与巴黎系统产生更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信