Targeted reaching with monocular depth information and haptic feedback: Comparing between monocular patients and normally sighted observers

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Le Gao , Zitian Liu , Zidong Chen , Jing S. Pan , Minbin Yu
{"title":"Targeted reaching with monocular depth information and haptic feedback: Comparing between monocular patients and normally sighted observers","authors":"Le Gao ,&nbsp;Zitian Liu ,&nbsp;Zidong Chen ,&nbsp;Jing S. Pan ,&nbsp;Minbin Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2023.108274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Monocular blindness impairs visual depth perception, yet patients seldom report difficulties in targeted actions like reaching, walking, or driving. We hypothesized that by utilizing monocular depth information and calibrating actions with haptic feedback, monocular patients can perceive egocentric distance and perform targeted actions. We compared targeted reaching in monocular patients, monocular-viewing, and binocular-viewing normal controls. Sixty observers reached either a far or a near target, calibrating reaches to the near target with accurate or false feedback while leaving reaches to the far target uncalibrated. Reaching accuracy and precision were analyzed. Results indicated no difference in reaching accuracy between monocular patients and normal controls; all groups initially underestimated distances before until calibration. Monocular patients responded to calibration sensitively, achieving accuracy in calibrated reaches and generalizing this effect to uncalibrated distances. Thus, with monocular depth information and haptic feedback, monocular patients could perceive distance and accomplish targeted reaching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698923000986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monocular blindness impairs visual depth perception, yet patients seldom report difficulties in targeted actions like reaching, walking, or driving. We hypothesized that by utilizing monocular depth information and calibrating actions with haptic feedback, monocular patients can perceive egocentric distance and perform targeted actions. We compared targeted reaching in monocular patients, monocular-viewing, and binocular-viewing normal controls. Sixty observers reached either a far or a near target, calibrating reaches to the near target with accurate or false feedback while leaving reaches to the far target uncalibrated. Reaching accuracy and precision were analyzed. Results indicated no difference in reaching accuracy between monocular patients and normal controls; all groups initially underestimated distances before until calibration. Monocular patients responded to calibration sensitively, achieving accuracy in calibrated reaches and generalizing this effect to uncalibrated distances. Thus, with monocular depth information and haptic feedback, monocular patients could perceive distance and accomplish targeted reaching.

单目深度信息和触觉反馈的目标到达:单目患者和正常视力观察者之间的比较
单眼盲会损害视觉深度感知,但患者很少报告在伸手、走路或开车等有针对性的行动中遇到困难。我们假设,通过利用单眼深度信息和触觉反馈校准动作,单眼患者可以感知以自我为中心的距离并进行有针对性的动作。我们比较了单眼患者、单眼观察和双眼观察正常对照组的目标到达情况。60名观察者到达远目标或近目标,用准确或错误的反馈校准到达近目标的距离,而未校准到达远目标的距离。对达到精度和精密度进行了分析。结果表明,单眼患者和正常对照组在达到准确度方面没有差异;在校准之前,所有组最初都低估了距离。单眼患者对校准反应灵敏,在校准范围内达到准确度,并将这种影响推广到未校准的距离。因此,通过单目深度信息和触觉反馈,单目患者可以感知距离并完成有针对性的到达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信