Course of Duration and Trigger Factors of Vertigo Attacks in Patients with Benign Recurrent Vertigo, Menière's Disease, or Vestibular Migraine.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Audiology and Neuro-Otology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1159/000531545
Maarten C Uijttewaal, Roeland B van Leeuwen, Carla Colijn, Tjard R Schermer
{"title":"Course of Duration and Trigger Factors of Vertigo Attacks in Patients with Benign Recurrent Vertigo, Menière's Disease, or Vestibular Migraine.","authors":"Maarten C Uijttewaal, Roeland B van Leeuwen, Carla Colijn, Tjard R Schermer","doi":"10.1159/000531545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Benign recurrent vertigo (BRV), Menière's disease (MD), and vestibular migraine (VM) show many similarities with regard to the course of vertigo attacks and clinical features. In this paper, we elaborate on the decreasing frequency of vertigo attacks observed in a previous study from our group by exploring changes in the duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in patients with BRV, MD, or VM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this 3-year prospective cohort study in our tertiary referral center we recruited patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BRV, MD, or VM by a neurologist and otorhinolaryngologist in our center in 2015-2016. A study-specific questionnaire was used to assess the usual duration of vertigo attacks and their potential triggers every 6 months. Main outcome measures were changes in duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in the subgroups of patients with persisting attacks, which were analyzed using repeated measures logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>121 patients were included (BRV: n = 44; MD: n = 43; VM: n = 34) of whom 117 completed the 3-year follow-up period and 57 (48.7%) kept reporting vertigo attacks at one more follow-up measurements. None of the diagnosis groups showed statistically significant shortening of attack duration at the subsequent annual follow-up measurements compared to baseline. At baseline, stress and fatigue being reported as triggers for attacks differed significantly between the three groups (stress: BRV 40.9%, MD 62.8%, VM 76.5%, p = 0.005; fatigue: BRV 31.0%, MD 48.8%, VM 68.8%, p = 0.003). In the VM group, a consistent reduction of stress and fatigue as triggers was observed up until the 24- and the 30-month follow-up measurements, respectively, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 0.15 to 0.33 (all p &lt; 0.05). In the MD group, a consistent reduction of head movements as trigger was observed from the 24-month measurement onward (ORs ranging from 0.07 to 0.11, all p &lt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed no reduction in vertigo attack duration over time in patients with BRV, MD, and VM who remain to have vertigo attacks. In VM and MD patients with persisting vertigo attacks stress, fatigue and head movements became less predominant triggers for vertigo attacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Benign recurrent vertigo (BRV), Menière's disease (MD), and vestibular migraine (VM) show many similarities with regard to the course of vertigo attacks and clinical features. In this paper, we elaborate on the decreasing frequency of vertigo attacks observed in a previous study from our group by exploring changes in the duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in patients with BRV, MD, or VM.

Methods: For this 3-year prospective cohort study in our tertiary referral center we recruited patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BRV, MD, or VM by a neurologist and otorhinolaryngologist in our center in 2015-2016. A study-specific questionnaire was used to assess the usual duration of vertigo attacks and their potential triggers every 6 months. Main outcome measures were changes in duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in the subgroups of patients with persisting attacks, which were analyzed using repeated measures logistic regression models.

Results: 121 patients were included (BRV: n = 44; MD: n = 43; VM: n = 34) of whom 117 completed the 3-year follow-up period and 57 (48.7%) kept reporting vertigo attacks at one more follow-up measurements. None of the diagnosis groups showed statistically significant shortening of attack duration at the subsequent annual follow-up measurements compared to baseline. At baseline, stress and fatigue being reported as triggers for attacks differed significantly between the three groups (stress: BRV 40.9%, MD 62.8%, VM 76.5%, p = 0.005; fatigue: BRV 31.0%, MD 48.8%, VM 68.8%, p = 0.003). In the VM group, a consistent reduction of stress and fatigue as triggers was observed up until the 24- and the 30-month follow-up measurements, respectively, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 0.15 to 0.33 (all p < 0.05). In the MD group, a consistent reduction of head movements as trigger was observed from the 24-month measurement onward (ORs ranging from 0.07 to 0.11, all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study showed no reduction in vertigo attack duration over time in patients with BRV, MD, and VM who remain to have vertigo attacks. In VM and MD patients with persisting vertigo attacks stress, fatigue and head movements became less predominant triggers for vertigo attacks.

良性复发性眩晕、梅尼埃病或前庭性偏头痛患者眩晕发作的持续时间和诱发因素。
导言:良性复发性眩晕(BRV)、梅尼埃病(MD)和前庭性偏头痛(VM)在眩晕发作过程和临床特征方面有许多相似之处。在本文中,我们通过探讨 BRV、MD 或 VM 患者眩晕发作持续时间和诱发因素的变化,详细阐述了我们小组之前的一项研究中观察到的眩晕发作频率下降的情况:在这项为期 3 年的前瞻性队列研究中,我们招募了 2015-2016 年在本三级转诊中心由神经科医生和耳鼻喉科医生确诊为 BRV、MD 或 VM 的患者。我们采用了一份研究专用问卷,每 6 个月评估一次眩晕发作的通常持续时间及其潜在诱因。主要结果指标为持续发作亚组患者的眩晕发作持续时间和诱发因素的变化,采用重复测量逻辑回归模型进行分析:共纳入 121 名患者(BRV:44 人;MD:43 人;VM:34 人),其中 117 人完成了为期 3 年的随访,57 人(48.7%)在再次随访时仍报告眩晕发作。与基线相比,各诊断组在随后的年度随访测量中均未发现眩晕发作持续时间有统计学意义的缩短。在基线时,压力和疲劳被报告为眩晕发作的诱因,三组之间存在显著差异(压力组:BRV 40.9%;MD 组:BRV 40.9%;MD 组:BRV 40.9%):BRV:40.9%,MD:62.8%,VM:76.5%,P = 0.005;疲劳:BRV:31.0%,MD:62.8%,VM:76.5%,P = 0.005:BRV 31.0%,MD 48.8%,VM 68.8%,p = 0.003)。在 VM 组中,直到 24 个月和 30 个月的随访测量,压力和疲劳的诱发因素分别持续减少,几率比(ORs)从 0.15 到 0.33 不等(所有 p 均为 0.05)。在 MD 组中,从 24 个月的测量开始,作为触发因素的头部运动持续减少(ORs 从 0.07 到 0.11 不等,所有 p 均为 0.05):我们的研究表明,随着时间的推移,BRV、MD 和 VM 患者的眩晕发作持续时间并没有缩短。在眩晕持续发作的 VM 和 MD 患者中,压力、疲劳和头部运动已不再是眩晕发作的主要诱因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信