Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Data Sharing to Encourage Collaboration Among Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Care Partners: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

IF 4
JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.2196/46627
Alycia A Bristol, Michelle Litchman, Cynthia Berg, Ernest Grigorian, Denise Small, Ashley Glazener, Christopher Jones, Nancy A Allen
{"title":"Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Data Sharing to Encourage Collaboration Among Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Care Partners: Qualitative Descriptive Study.","authors":"Alycia A Bristol, Michelle Litchman, Cynthia Berg, Ernest Grigorian, Denise Small, Ashley Glazener, Christopher Jones, Nancy A Allen","doi":"10.2196/46627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons with diabetes use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to self-manage their diabetes. Care partners (CPs) frequently become involved in supporting persons with diabetes in the management of their diabetes. However, persons with diabetes and CP dyads may require more communication and problem-solving skills regarding how to share and respond to CGM data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of persons with diabetes and CPs who participated in the Share \"plus\" intervention, which addresses dyadic communication strategies, problem-solving, and action planning to promote sharing of CGM data among the dyad.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten dyads participated in the Share \"plus\" telehealth intervention. Participants were interviewed during and after the Share \"plus\" intervention. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During postsession interviews, dyads described feeling a sense of shared responsibility yet viewed the persons with diabetes as ultimately responsible for the disease. Additionally, dyads shared that communication patterns improved and were able to recognize the negative aspects of previously established communication patterns. Dyads reported communication focused on hypoglycemia episodes while also differing in the frequency they reviewed CGM data and set alerts. Overall, dyads expressed positive reactions to the Share \"plus\" intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Share \"plus\" was helpful in promoting positive CGM-related communication among dyads and encouraged more CP support. CPs play an important role in supporting older adults with type 1 diabetes. Communication strategies help support dyad involvement in CGM data sharing and self-management among persons with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"6 ","pages":"e46627"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/46627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persons with diabetes use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to self-manage their diabetes. Care partners (CPs) frequently become involved in supporting persons with diabetes in the management of their diabetes. However, persons with diabetes and CP dyads may require more communication and problem-solving skills regarding how to share and respond to CGM data.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of persons with diabetes and CPs who participated in the Share "plus" intervention, which addresses dyadic communication strategies, problem-solving, and action planning to promote sharing of CGM data among the dyad.

Methods: Ten dyads participated in the Share "plus" telehealth intervention. Participants were interviewed during and after the Share "plus" intervention. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data.

Results: During postsession interviews, dyads described feeling a sense of shared responsibility yet viewed the persons with diabetes as ultimately responsible for the disease. Additionally, dyads shared that communication patterns improved and were able to recognize the negative aspects of previously established communication patterns. Dyads reported communication focused on hypoglycemia episodes while also differing in the frequency they reviewed CGM data and set alerts. Overall, dyads expressed positive reactions to the Share "plus" intervention.

Conclusions: Share "plus" was helpful in promoting positive CGM-related communication among dyads and encouraged more CP support. CPs play an important role in supporting older adults with type 1 diabetes. Communication strategies help support dyad involvement in CGM data sharing and self-management among persons with diabetes.

Abstract Image

利用连续血糖监测和数据共享鼓励 1 型糖尿病老年患者及其护理伙伴之间的合作:定性描述研究。
背景:糖尿病患者使用连续血糖监测(CGM)来自我管理糖尿病。护理伙伴(CP)经常参与支持糖尿病患者的糖尿病管理。然而,糖尿病患者和护理伙伴在如何分享和回应 CGM 数据方面可能需要更多的沟通和解决问题的技巧:本研究的目的是描述糖尿病患者和 CPs 参与 "分享加 "干预的经验,该干预涉及促进双方共享 CGM 数据的双方沟通策略、问题解决和行动规划:方法:10 对夫妇参加了 Share "plus "远程保健干预。在 Share "plus "干预期间和之后对参与者进行了访谈。采用主题分析法对访谈数据进行分析:在干预后的访谈中,参与者描述了共同承担责任的感觉,但认为糖尿病患者才是疾病的最终责任人。此外,二人组还分享了沟通模式的改善,并能够认识到之前建立的沟通模式的消极方面。据报告,双方的沟通主要集中在低血糖事件上,同时在查看 CGM 数据和设置警报的频率上也有所不同。总的来说,两人对 "分享 "干预措施反应积极:结论:分享 "加 "有助于促进参与者之间与 CGM 相关的积极交流,并鼓励 CP 提供更多支持。CP 在支持患有 1 型糖尿病的老年人方面发挥着重要作用。沟通策略有助于支持双方参与 CGM 数据共享和糖尿病患者的自我管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信