Psychometric properties of the Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health: a validation study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sao Paulo Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623
Mayara Karoline Silva Lacerda, Maria Aparecida Vieira, Fabrine Costa Marques, Juliana Pereira Alves, Matheus Mendes Pereira, Andreia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo, Mark Napoli Costa, Antônio Prates Caldeira, Cristina Andrade Sampaio
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health: a validation study.","authors":"Mayara Karoline Silva Lacerda,&nbsp;Maria Aparecida Vieira,&nbsp;Fabrine Costa Marques,&nbsp;Juliana Pereira Alves,&nbsp;Matheus Mendes Pereira,&nbsp;Andreia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo,&nbsp;Mark Napoli Costa,&nbsp;Antônio Prates Caldeira,&nbsp;Cristina Andrade Sampaio","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precisely determining the aspects related to an instrument's validity and reliability measures allows for greater assurance of the quality of the results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the psychometric properties of The Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health services.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>The instrument validation study was conducted in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The validation study was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist to analyze its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A committee of expert judges performed content validation after which the Content Validity Index was calculated. Construct validation took place through Exploratory Factor Analysis using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Test criterion and Bartlett's Sphericity Test. Reliability was verified using test-retest reliability. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5% (P < 0.05). The final instrument comprised 54 questions. The Content Validity Index was 97%. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index of 0.901 and Bartlett's Sphericity Test with P < 0.001. We obtained a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.849.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Providers Survey, translated and adapted into Portuguese, was named the Work Assessment Instrument for the Recovery of Mental Health. It presented adequate psychometric properties for evaluating work-related practices for the recovery of psychosocial care network users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":"142 2","pages":"e2022444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Precisely determining the aspects related to an instrument's validity and reliability measures allows for greater assurance of the quality of the results.

Objectives: To analyze the psychometric properties of The Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health services.

Design and setting: The instrument validation study was conducted in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Methods: The validation study was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist to analyze its validity and reliability.

Results: A committee of expert judges performed content validation after which the Content Validity Index was calculated. Construct validation took place through Exploratory Factor Analysis using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Test criterion and Bartlett's Sphericity Test. Reliability was verified using test-retest reliability. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5% (P < 0.05). The final instrument comprised 54 questions. The Content Validity Index was 97%. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index of 0.901 and Bartlett's Sphericity Test with P < 0.001. We obtained a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.849.

Conclusions: The Providers Survey, translated and adapted into Portuguese, was named the Work Assessment Instrument for the Recovery of Mental Health. It presented adequate psychometric properties for evaluating work-related practices for the recovery of psychosocial care network users.

巴西心理健康背景下提供者调查的心理测量特性:一项验证研究。
背景:准确确定与仪器有效性和可靠性测量相关的方面,可以更好地保证结果的质量。目的:分析巴西心理健康服务提供者调查的心理测量特性。设计和设置:仪器验证研究在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州蒙特斯克拉罗斯进行。方法:使用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准检查表进行验证研究,以分析其有效性和可靠性。结果:一个由专家评委组成的委员会进行了内容验证,然后计算出内容有效性指数。构造验证通过探索性因素分析进行,使用Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin检验标准和Bartlett球度检验。使用重新测试的可靠性来验证可靠性。统计学检验采用的显著性水平为5%(P<0.05)。最终工具包括54个问题。内容有效性指数为97%。探索性因素分析发现Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin指数为0.901,Bartlett球度检验结果为P<0.001。我们获得了0.95的Cronbachα系数和0.849的组内相关系数。结论:提供者调查被翻译并改编成葡萄牙语,被命名为心理健康恢复工作评估工具。它提供了足够的心理测量特性,用于评估心理社会护理网络用户康复的工作实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Sao Paulo Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信