Skeletal structure of asymmetric mandibular prognathism and retrognathism.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tong Xi, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Stefaan Bergé, Thomas Maal, Tae-Geon Kwon
{"title":"Skeletal structure of asymmetric mandibular prognathism and retrognathism.","authors":"Tong Xi, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Stefaan Bergé, Thomas Maal, Tae-Geon Kwon","doi":"10.1186/s40902-023-00393-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the skeletal structures between mandibular prognathism and retrognathism among patients with facial asymmetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who had mandibular asymmetry with retrognathism (Group A) in The Netherlands were compared with those with deviated mandibular prognathism (Group B) in Korea. All the data were obtained from 3D-reformatted cone-beam computed tomography images from each institute. The right and left condylar heads were located more posteriorly, inferiorly, and medially in Group B than in Group A. The deviated side of Group A and the contralateral side of Group B showed similar condylar width and height, ramus-proper height, and ramus height. Interestingly, there were no inter-group differences in the ramus-proper heights. Asymmetric mandibular body length was the most significantly correlated with chin asymmetry in retrognathic asymmetry patients whereas asymmetric elongation of condylar process was the most important factor for chin asymmetry in deviated mandibular prognathism.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the 3D positional difference of gonion and large individual variations of frontal ramal inclination, significant structural deformation in deviated mandibular prognathism need to be considered in asymmetric prognathism patients. Therefore, Individually planned surgical procedures that also correct the malpositioning of the mandibular ramus are recommended especially in patients with asymmetric prognathism.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"45 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10412507/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00393-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the skeletal structures between mandibular prognathism and retrognathism among patients with facial asymmetry.

Results: Patients who had mandibular asymmetry with retrognathism (Group A) in The Netherlands were compared with those with deviated mandibular prognathism (Group B) in Korea. All the data were obtained from 3D-reformatted cone-beam computed tomography images from each institute. The right and left condylar heads were located more posteriorly, inferiorly, and medially in Group B than in Group A. The deviated side of Group A and the contralateral side of Group B showed similar condylar width and height, ramus-proper height, and ramus height. Interestingly, there were no inter-group differences in the ramus-proper heights. Asymmetric mandibular body length was the most significantly correlated with chin asymmetry in retrognathic asymmetry patients whereas asymmetric elongation of condylar process was the most important factor for chin asymmetry in deviated mandibular prognathism.

Conclusion: Considering the 3D positional difference of gonion and large individual variations of frontal ramal inclination, significant structural deformation in deviated mandibular prognathism need to be considered in asymmetric prognathism patients. Therefore, Individually planned surgical procedures that also correct the malpositioning of the mandibular ramus are recommended especially in patients with asymmetric prognathism.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不对称下颌骨前突和后突的骨骼结构。
背景:本研究旨在比较面部不对称患者下颌前突和下颌后突的骨骼结构。结果:将荷兰的下颌不对称伴后颌畸形患者(A组)与韩国的下颌前颌畸形患者(B组)进行比较。所有数据均来自各研究所的三维锥形束计算机断层扫描图像。B组左、右髁头位置较A组偏后、偏下、偏中,A组偏侧与B组对侧髁宽、高度、支高、支高相似。有趣的是,支固有高度在组间没有差异。下颌体长不对称是下颌后突不对称患者下颌不对称的最显著因素,而髁突伸长不对称是下颌偏前突患者下颌不对称的最重要因素。结论:考虑到阴离子的三维位置差异和额支倾斜度的个体差异较大,不对称前突患者需要考虑偏斜下颌前突明显的结构变形。因此,对于下颌前突不对称的患者,建议采用单独计划的外科手术来纠正下颌支的错位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信