"/" wiring (Durukan weave) to prevent sternal cutting by wires: a propensity score matched comparison with Robicsek weave.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Ahmet Baris Durukan, Hasan Alper Gurbuz, Elif Durukan, Hamed Zeinalabedini, Osman Tunc
{"title":"\"/\" wiring (Durukan weave) to prevent sternal cutting by wires: a propensity score matched comparison with Robicsek weave.","authors":"Ahmet Baris Durukan,&nbsp;Hasan Alper Gurbuz,&nbsp;Elif Durukan,&nbsp;Hamed Zeinalabedini,&nbsp;Osman Tunc","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2023.129540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sternal closure still causes morbidity/mortality following sternotomy. Robicsek weave, cable systems, rigid plates and nitinol clips are systems employed to prevent sternal dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to document the effectiveness of a novel method using standard sternal wires decreasing load on wires and spreading load on the lateral sternum to prevent sternal cutting by wires and thus sternal dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>756 patients who underwent coronary revascularization with sternotomy between July 2018 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty patients with \"/\"wiring were compared with 50 patients with Robicsek weave by propensity score matching. \"/\" wiring (Durukan weave) spreads load laterally on the sternum by lateral sequential knotting of wires instead of midline knotting. Outcomes were superficial and deep sternal wound infection and non-infectious sternal dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 50 patients in each group. Mean age of the patients was 65.74 ±7.47 in Robicsek weave and 66.12 ±7.23 in Durukan weave. The perioperative characteristics of patients were comparable as propensity score matching was performed. None developed superficial sternal wound infection in Robicsek weave, whereas 2% (1) in \"/\"wiring. There was no deep sternal wound infection in each group. Non-infectious sternal dehiscence did not occur in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\"/\" wiring seems to be a safe and cost-effective method for sternal closure for preventing sternal cutting by wires, therefore preventing sternal wound related problems and dehiscence. The method is cheap, easily applicable and less time consuming than Robicsek weave, which was proven to be the safest method for sternal wire closure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":"20 2","pages":"72-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/bb/KITP-20-51115.PMC10410634.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2023.129540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sternal closure still causes morbidity/mortality following sternotomy. Robicsek weave, cable systems, rigid plates and nitinol clips are systems employed to prevent sternal dehiscence.

Aim: The aim was to document the effectiveness of a novel method using standard sternal wires decreasing load on wires and spreading load on the lateral sternum to prevent sternal cutting by wires and thus sternal dehiscence.

Material and methods: 756 patients who underwent coronary revascularization with sternotomy between July 2018 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty patients with "/"wiring were compared with 50 patients with Robicsek weave by propensity score matching. "/" wiring (Durukan weave) spreads load laterally on the sternum by lateral sequential knotting of wires instead of midline knotting. Outcomes were superficial and deep sternal wound infection and non-infectious sternal dehiscence.

Results: There were 50 patients in each group. Mean age of the patients was 65.74 ±7.47 in Robicsek weave and 66.12 ±7.23 in Durukan weave. The perioperative characteristics of patients were comparable as propensity score matching was performed. None developed superficial sternal wound infection in Robicsek weave, whereas 2% (1) in "/"wiring. There was no deep sternal wound infection in each group. Non-infectious sternal dehiscence did not occur in either group.

Conclusions: "/" wiring seems to be a safe and cost-effective method for sternal closure for preventing sternal cutting by wires, therefore preventing sternal wound related problems and dehiscence. The method is cheap, easily applicable and less time consuming than Robicsek weave, which was proven to be the safest method for sternal wire closure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

"/"线(杜鲁肯编织)防止胸骨被线切割:倾向得分与Robicsek编织相匹配。
简介:胸骨切开术后,胸骨闭合仍然会导致发病率/死亡率。Robicsek编织,电缆系统,刚性板和镍钛诺夹是用来防止胸骨开裂的系统。目的:目的是证明一种使用标准胸骨钉的新方法的有效性,该方法减少了胸骨钉上的负荷,并在胸骨外侧分散了负荷,以防止胸骨被钉切断,从而导致胸骨开裂。材料与方法:回顾性分析2018年7月至2022年11月756例胸骨切开行冠状动脉血运重建术的患者。将50例“/”型布线患者与50例Robicsek编织患者进行倾向评分匹配比较。“/”钢丝(杜鲁肯编织)通过钢丝的横向顺序打结而不是中线打结在胸骨上横向分散负荷。结果为浅、深胸骨伤口感染和非感染性胸骨裂。结果:每组50例。Robicsek编织组平均年龄65.74±7.47岁,Durukan编织组平均年龄66.12±7.23岁。通过倾向评分匹配,患者围手术期特征具有可比性。Robicsek编织组中没有一例发生胸骨浅表感染,而“/”型编织组中有2%(1)。两组患者均无深部胸骨伤口感染。两组均未发生非感染性胸骨裂。结论:“/”型接线是一种安全、经济的胸骨闭合方法,可防止导线切割胸骨,从而防止胸骨伤口相关问题和破裂。与Robicsek编织法相比,该方法成本低,使用方便,耗时短,是最安全的胸骨丝闭合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信