A systematic review of peptide-based serological tests for the diagnosis of leishmaniasis.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Parasite Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1051/parasite/2023011
Julie Pagniez, Elodie Petitdidier, Oriana Parra-Zuleta, Joana Pissarra, Rachel Bras-Gonçalves
{"title":"A systematic review of peptide-based serological tests for the diagnosis of leishmaniasis.","authors":"Julie Pagniez,&nbsp;Elodie Petitdidier,&nbsp;Oriana Parra-Zuleta,&nbsp;Joana Pissarra,&nbsp;Rachel Bras-Gonçalves","doi":"10.1051/parasite/2023011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serological methods should meet the needs of leishmaniasis diagnosis due to their high sensitivity and specificity, economical and adaptable rapid diagnostic test format, and ease of use. Currently, the performances of serological diagnostic tests, despite improvements with recombinant proteins, vary greatly depending on the clinical form of leishmaniasis and the endemic area. Peptide-based serological tests are promising as they could compensate for antigenic variability and improve performance, independently of Leishmania species and subspecies circulating in the endemic areas. The objective of this systematic review was to inventory all studies published from 2002 to 2022 that evaluate synthetic peptides for serological diagnosis of human leishmaniases and also to highlight the performance (e.g., sensitivity and specificity) of each peptide reported in these studies. All clinical forms of leishmaniasis, visceral and tegumentary, and all Leishmania species responsible for these diseases were considered. Following PRISMA statement recommendations, 1,405 studies were identified but only 22 articles met the selection criteria and were included in this systematic review. These original research articles described 77 different peptides, of which several have promising performance for visceral or tegumentary leishmaniasis diagnosis. This review highlights the importance of and growing interest in synthetic peptides used for serological diagnosis of leishmaniases, and their performances compared to some widely used tests with recombinant proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":19796,"journal":{"name":"Parasite","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069404/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2023011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Serological methods should meet the needs of leishmaniasis diagnosis due to their high sensitivity and specificity, economical and adaptable rapid diagnostic test format, and ease of use. Currently, the performances of serological diagnostic tests, despite improvements with recombinant proteins, vary greatly depending on the clinical form of leishmaniasis and the endemic area. Peptide-based serological tests are promising as they could compensate for antigenic variability and improve performance, independently of Leishmania species and subspecies circulating in the endemic areas. The objective of this systematic review was to inventory all studies published from 2002 to 2022 that evaluate synthetic peptides for serological diagnosis of human leishmaniases and also to highlight the performance (e.g., sensitivity and specificity) of each peptide reported in these studies. All clinical forms of leishmaniasis, visceral and tegumentary, and all Leishmania species responsible for these diseases were considered. Following PRISMA statement recommendations, 1,405 studies were identified but only 22 articles met the selection criteria and were included in this systematic review. These original research articles described 77 different peptides, of which several have promising performance for visceral or tegumentary leishmaniasis diagnosis. This review highlights the importance of and growing interest in synthetic peptides used for serological diagnosis of leishmaniases, and their performances compared to some widely used tests with recombinant proteins.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以多肽为基础的血清学检测诊断利什曼病的系统综述。
血清学方法具有敏感性高、特异性强、经济、适应性强、快速诊断检测格式简便等特点,应满足利什曼病诊断的需要。目前,尽管重组蛋白改善了血清学诊断测试的性能,但由于利什曼病的临床形式和流行地区的不同,血清学诊断测试的性能差异很大。基于多肽的血清学检测很有希望,因为它们可以弥补抗原变异并提高检测效果,而不受流行地区利什曼原虫种和亚种的影响。本系统综述的目的是盘点2002年至2022年发表的所有评价合成肽用于人类利什曼病血清学诊断的研究,并强调这些研究中报告的每种肽的性能(例如,敏感性和特异性)。考虑了所有临床形式的利什曼病,内脏和皮肤,以及导致这些疾病的所有利什曼原虫种类。按照PRISMA声明的建议,我们确定了1405项研究,但只有22篇文章符合选择标准并纳入本系统综述。这些原创研究文章描述了77种不同的肽,其中一些在内脏或内脏利什曼病诊断方面有很好的表现。这篇综述强调了用于利什曼病血清学诊断的合成肽的重要性和日益增长的兴趣,以及它们与一些广泛使用的重组蛋白检测相比的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasite
Parasite 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
49
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Parasite is an international open-access, peer-reviewed, online journal publishing high quality papers on all aspects of human and animal parasitology. Reviews, articles and short notes may be submitted. Fields include, but are not limited to: general, medical and veterinary parasitology; morphology, including ultrastructure; parasite systematics, including entomology, acarology, helminthology and protistology, and molecular analyses; molecular biology and biochemistry; immunology of parasitic diseases; host-parasite relationships; ecology and life history of parasites; epidemiology; therapeutics; new diagnostic tools. All papers in Parasite are published in English. Manuscripts should have a broad interest and must not have been published or submitted elsewhere. No limit is imposed on the length of manuscripts, but they should be concisely written. Papers of limited interest such as case reports, epidemiological studies in punctual areas, isolated new geographical records, and systematic descriptions of single species will generally not be accepted, but might be considered if the authors succeed in demonstrating their interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信