Quantitative evaluation of the influence of multiple MRI sequences and of pathological tissues on the registration of longitudinal data acquired during brain tumor treatment.

Luca Canalini, Jan Klein, Diana Waldmannstetter, Florian Kofler, Stefano Cerri, Alessa Hering, Stefan Heldmann, Sarah Schlaeger, Bjoern H Menze, Benedikt Wiestler, Jan Kirschke, Horst K Hahn
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of the influence of multiple MRI sequences and of pathological tissues on the registration of longitudinal data acquired during brain tumor treatment.","authors":"Luca Canalini,&nbsp;Jan Klein,&nbsp;Diana Waldmannstetter,&nbsp;Florian Kofler,&nbsp;Stefano Cerri,&nbsp;Alessa Hering,&nbsp;Stefan Heldmann,&nbsp;Sarah Schlaeger,&nbsp;Bjoern H Menze,&nbsp;Benedikt Wiestler,&nbsp;Jan Kirschke,&nbsp;Horst K Hahn","doi":"10.3389/fnimg.2022.977491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Registration methods facilitate the comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance images acquired at different stages of brain tumor treatments. Image-based registration solutions are influenced by the sequences chosen to compute the distance measure, and the lack of image correspondences due to the resection cavities and pathological tissues. Nonetheless, an evaluation of the impact of these input parameters on the registration of longitudinal data is still missing. This work evaluates the influence of multiple sequences, namely T1-weighted (T1), T2-weighted (T2), contrast enhanced T1-weighted (T1-CE), and T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), and the exclusion of the pathological tissues on the non-rigid registration of pre- and post-operative images. We here investigate two types of registration methods, an iterative approach and a convolutional neural network solution based on a 3D U-Net. We employ two test sets to compute the mean target registration error (mTRE) based on corresponding landmarks. In the first set, markers are positioned exclusively in the surroundings of the pathology. The methods employing T1-CE achieves the lowest mTREs, with a improvement up to 0.8 mm for the iterative solution. The results are higher than the baseline when using the FLAIR sequence. When excluding the pathology, lower mTREs are observable for most of the methods. In the second test set, corresponding landmarks are located in the entire brain volumes. Both solutions employing T1-CE obtain the lowest mTREs, with a decrease up to 1.16 mm for the iterative method, whereas the results worsen using the FLAIR. When excluding the pathology, an improvement is observable for the CNN method using T1-CE. Both approaches utilizing the T1-CE sequence obtain the best mTREs, whereas the FLAIR is the least informative to guide the registration process. Besides, the exclusion of pathology from the distance measure computation improves the registration of the brain tissues surrounding the tumor. Thus, this work provides the first numerical evaluation of the influence of these parameters on the registration of longitudinal magnetic resonance images, and it can be helpful for developing future algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73094,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","volume":"1 ","pages":"977491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2022.977491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Registration methods facilitate the comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance images acquired at different stages of brain tumor treatments. Image-based registration solutions are influenced by the sequences chosen to compute the distance measure, and the lack of image correspondences due to the resection cavities and pathological tissues. Nonetheless, an evaluation of the impact of these input parameters on the registration of longitudinal data is still missing. This work evaluates the influence of multiple sequences, namely T1-weighted (T1), T2-weighted (T2), contrast enhanced T1-weighted (T1-CE), and T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), and the exclusion of the pathological tissues on the non-rigid registration of pre- and post-operative images. We here investigate two types of registration methods, an iterative approach and a convolutional neural network solution based on a 3D U-Net. We employ two test sets to compute the mean target registration error (mTRE) based on corresponding landmarks. In the first set, markers are positioned exclusively in the surroundings of the pathology. The methods employing T1-CE achieves the lowest mTREs, with a improvement up to 0.8 mm for the iterative solution. The results are higher than the baseline when using the FLAIR sequence. When excluding the pathology, lower mTREs are observable for most of the methods. In the second test set, corresponding landmarks are located in the entire brain volumes. Both solutions employing T1-CE obtain the lowest mTREs, with a decrease up to 1.16 mm for the iterative method, whereas the results worsen using the FLAIR. When excluding the pathology, an improvement is observable for the CNN method using T1-CE. Both approaches utilizing the T1-CE sequence obtain the best mTREs, whereas the FLAIR is the least informative to guide the registration process. Besides, the exclusion of pathology from the distance measure computation improves the registration of the brain tissues surrounding the tumor. Thus, this work provides the first numerical evaluation of the influence of these parameters on the registration of longitudinal magnetic resonance images, and it can be helpful for developing future algorithms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

定量评价多个MRI序列和病理组织对脑肿瘤治疗期间获得的纵向数据登记的影响。
配准方法便于对脑肿瘤治疗不同阶段获得的多参数磁共振图像进行比较。基于图像的配准解决方案受到用于计算距离度量的序列的影响,以及由于切除空腔和病理组织而缺乏图像对应。尽管如此,对这些输入参数对纵向数据注册的影响的评估仍然缺失。本研究评估了T1加权(T1)、T2加权(T2)、对比度增强T1加权(T1- ce)和T2流体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)等多个序列对术前和术后图像非刚性配准的影响,以及病理组织的排除。我们在此研究了两种类型的配准方法,迭代方法和基于3D U-Net的卷积神经网络解决方案。我们使用两个测试集来计算基于相应地标的平均目标配准误差(mTRE)。在第一组中,标记只定位在病理周围。采用T1-CE的方法获得了最低的mTREs,迭代解的mTREs提高了0.8 mm。当使用FLAIR序列时,结果高于基线。当排除病理因素时,大多数方法的mTREs都较低。在第二个测试集中,相应的地标位于整个脑容量中。采用T1-CE的两种解决方案都获得了最低的mTREs,迭代方法的mTREs降低了1.16 mm,而使用FLAIR的结果更差。当排除病理时,使用T1-CE的CNN方法可以观察到改善。利用T1-CE序列的两种方法都获得了最佳的mTREs,而FLAIR在指导配准过程中信息量最少。此外,从距离测量计算中排除病理,提高了肿瘤周围脑组织的配准。因此,这项工作提供了这些参数对纵向磁共振图像配准影响的第一个数值评估,并且可以为开发未来的算法提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信