Hemoglobin S target of <50% as compared to 30% in chronic red cell exchange for secondary stroke prevention in sickle cell disease

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Jihee Choi MD, John Emmanuel Markantonis MD, Nicole De Simone MD, Alecia Nero MD, Jaehyup Kim MD, PhD, Ravi Sarode MD
{"title":"Hemoglobin S target of <50% as compared to 30% in chronic red cell exchange for secondary stroke prevention in sickle cell disease","authors":"Jihee Choi MD,&nbsp;John Emmanuel Markantonis MD,&nbsp;Nicole De Simone MD,&nbsp;Alecia Nero MD,&nbsp;Jaehyup Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ravi Sarode MD","doi":"10.1002/jca.22078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients with a history of stroke are encouraged to receive chronic red blood cell exchange (RBCx) for stroke prevention. The American Society of Hematology guideline published in 2020 recommends an HbS target of &lt;30%. However, this approach necessitates more frequent RBCx and more RBC units. UT Southwestern has devised a chronic exchange protocol that elevates the HbS target to &lt;50% in patients with a low risk of stroke.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective chart review study reviewed the medical records of patients receiving chronic RBCx with a target of HbS &lt;50% over the past 10-year period to assess the safety of maintaining higher HbS targets in SCD patients with a low risk of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 49 SCD patients in the chronic RBCx program for secondary stroke prevention, 33 patients were maintained on an HbS target of &lt;50% (average measured: 35.4%) for the duration of RBCx program enrollment (median 93.0 months, 95% CI, 83-99). Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) clearly attributable to changing target HbS had not been identified among the 33 study subjects. Seven patients experienced conversion between the HbS targets of &lt;50% and &lt;30% HbS target. Significant reductions were observed in the frequency of RBCx and usage of blood volume in four of them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings suggest that liberalizing the HbS target could confer clinical flexibility without increasing the risk of CVA in a selective population. Further studies to fully evaluate the potential benefits of this approach are indicated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"38 6","pages":"677-684"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.22078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients with a history of stroke are encouraged to receive chronic red blood cell exchange (RBCx) for stroke prevention. The American Society of Hematology guideline published in 2020 recommends an HbS target of <30%. However, this approach necessitates more frequent RBCx and more RBC units. UT Southwestern has devised a chronic exchange protocol that elevates the HbS target to <50% in patients with a low risk of stroke.

Study Design

This retrospective chart review study reviewed the medical records of patients receiving chronic RBCx with a target of HbS <50% over the past 10-year period to assess the safety of maintaining higher HbS targets in SCD patients with a low risk of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA).

Results

Among 49 SCD patients in the chronic RBCx program for secondary stroke prevention, 33 patients were maintained on an HbS target of <50% (average measured: 35.4%) for the duration of RBCx program enrollment (median 93.0 months, 95% CI, 83-99). Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) clearly attributable to changing target HbS had not been identified among the 33 study subjects. Seven patients experienced conversion between the HbS targets of <50% and <30% HbS target. Significant reductions were observed in the frequency of RBCx and usage of blood volume in four of them.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that liberalizing the HbS target could confer clinical flexibility without increasing the risk of CVA in a selective population. Further studies to fully evaluate the potential benefits of this approach are indicated.

在镰状细胞病中风的二级预防中,慢性红细胞交换的血红蛋白 S 目标值为 <50%,而不是 30
背景:有脑卒中史的镰状细胞病(SCD)患者被鼓励接受慢性红细胞交换(RBCx)来预防脑卒中。美国血液学学会(American Society of Hematology)于2020年发布的指南建议将HbS目标控制在30%。然而,这种方法需要更频繁的RBCx和更多的RBC单位。UT Southwestern设计了一种慢性交换方案,将低卒中风险患者的HbS目标提高到50%。本回顾性研究回顾了过去10年接受慢性RBCx治疗的HbS目标为50%的患者的医疗记录,以评估低脑血管事故(CVA)风险的SCD患者维持较高HbS目标的安全性。结果在49例SCD患者中,有33例患者在RBCx项目入组期间(中位93.0个月,95% CI, 83-99)维持在50%的HbS目标(平均测量值:35.4%)。在33名研究对象中尚未发现明显归因于目标HbS改变的中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)。7名患者的HbS靶标从50%变为30%。其中4例RBCx的频率和血容量的使用显著降低。结论:在选择性人群中,放宽HbS靶点可以赋予临床灵活性,而不会增加CVA的风险。进一步的研究,以充分评估这种方法的潜在效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信