Evaluating direct amplification from viral transport medium for SARS-CoV-2 detection, strain typing, and angiotensin-converting enzyme genotyping and expression assays.

Kala F Schilter, Shivani Kapoor, Brandon A Smith, Ayofemi Saleem, Samantha J Scott, Dana Batchelor, Kathryn A Stoll, Qian Nie, Honey V Reddi
{"title":"Evaluating direct amplification from viral transport medium for SARS-CoV-2 detection, strain typing, and angiotensin-converting enzyme genotyping and expression assays.","authors":"Kala F Schilter, Shivani Kapoor, Brandon A Smith, Ayofemi Saleem, Samantha J Scott, Dana Batchelor, Kathryn A Stoll, Qian Nie, Honey V Reddi","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the performance of direct amplification of viral nucleic acid from transport medium to extracted nucleic acid for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequencing, and genotyping applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>XpressAmp lysate and extracted total nucleic acid from viral transport medium containing nasopharyngeal specimens were evaluated across different molecular applications to determine performance characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 quantitative PCR and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotyping assays worked well with XpressAmp lysate, almost equal with or better than extracted nucleic acid in some specimens. However, XpressAmp completely failed to perform in next-generation sequencing for strain typing. Both protocols failed to detect ACE2 expression in viral transport medium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Direct amplification of viral nucleic acid from viral transport medium containing nasopharyngeal specimen works well for molecular assays with low thresholds of quality; however, it does have limitations with assays that require high quality nucleic acid for input. Use of the XpressAmp protocol significantly improves turnaround time and allows for easy ramp-up of PCR and genotyping assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":17951,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"267-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of direct amplification of viral nucleic acid from transport medium to extracted nucleic acid for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequencing, and genotyping applications.

Methods: XpressAmp lysate and extracted total nucleic acid from viral transport medium containing nasopharyngeal specimens were evaluated across different molecular applications to determine performance characteristics.

Results: SARS-CoV-2 quantitative PCR and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotyping assays worked well with XpressAmp lysate, almost equal with or better than extracted nucleic acid in some specimens. However, XpressAmp completely failed to perform in next-generation sequencing for strain typing. Both protocols failed to detect ACE2 expression in viral transport medium.

Conclusion: Direct amplification of viral nucleic acid from viral transport medium containing nasopharyngeal specimen works well for molecular assays with low thresholds of quality; however, it does have limitations with assays that require high quality nucleic acid for input. Use of the XpressAmp protocol significantly improves turnaround time and allows for easy ramp-up of PCR and genotyping assays.

评估用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测、毒株分型以及血管紧张素转换酶基因分型和表达测定的病毒运输培养基直接扩增技术。
研究目的本研究旨在比较在聚合酶链反应(PCR)、测序和基因分型应用中直接扩增运输培养基中的病毒核酸与提取核酸的性能:方法:对含有鼻咽标本的病毒运输培养基中的 XpressAmp 裂解液和提取的总核酸进行不同分子应用的评估,以确定其性能特点:结果:SARS-CoV-2 定量 PCR 和血管紧张素转换酶 (ACE) 基因分型检测与 XpressAmp 裂解液配合使用效果良好,在某些标本中几乎等同于或优于提取的核酸。但是,XpressAmp 在用于菌株分型的下一代测序中完全失效。两种方案都未能检测到病毒运输培养基中 ACE2 的表达:结论:从含有鼻咽标本的病毒运输培养基中直接扩增病毒核酸,对于质量阈值较低的分子检测非常有效;但对于需要高质量核酸输入的检测,这种方法存在局限性。使用 XpressAmp 方案可大大缩短周转时间,并使 PCR 和基因分型检测更容易进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信