Filling the gap: Cloze probability and sentence constraint norms for 807 European Portuguese sentences.

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-08 DOI:10.3758/s13428-023-02196-0
Sofia Frade, Andrea Santi, Ana Raposo
{"title":"Filling the gap: Cloze probability and sentence constraint norms for 807 European Portuguese sentences.","authors":"Sofia Frade, Andrea Santi, Ana Raposo","doi":"10.3758/s13428-023-02196-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sentence processing is affected by the sentence context and word expectancy. To investigate sentence comprehension experimentally, it is useful to have sentence completion norms with both context constraint and word expectancy measures. In this study, two experiments were conducted to collect norms for completion of 807 European Portuguese sentences. Context constraint was measured through type-token ratio and proportion idiosyncratic responses, while word expectancy was assessed by cloze probability. Besides establishing norms for a large sample of sentences, the study investigated the impact of the production procedure and method of analysis. In Experiment 1, a single-production procedure was used, i.e., participants completed each sentence fragment with only a single response, whereas in Experiment 2, a multiple-production procedure was used, i.e., participants have to provide up to three completion words for each sentence fragment. In Experiment 2, the analyses were obtained using two distinct methods: first-response analysis and combined-response analysis. The results showed that cloze and context measures are comparable between production paradigms and that the results from both analysis methods were correlated. The advantages of each production procedure and analysis method are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":" ","pages":"4009-4018"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11133143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02196-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sentence processing is affected by the sentence context and word expectancy. To investigate sentence comprehension experimentally, it is useful to have sentence completion norms with both context constraint and word expectancy measures. In this study, two experiments were conducted to collect norms for completion of 807 European Portuguese sentences. Context constraint was measured through type-token ratio and proportion idiosyncratic responses, while word expectancy was assessed by cloze probability. Besides establishing norms for a large sample of sentences, the study investigated the impact of the production procedure and method of analysis. In Experiment 1, a single-production procedure was used, i.e., participants completed each sentence fragment with only a single response, whereas in Experiment 2, a multiple-production procedure was used, i.e., participants have to provide up to three completion words for each sentence fragment. In Experiment 2, the analyses were obtained using two distinct methods: first-response analysis and combined-response analysis. The results showed that cloze and context measures are comparable between production paradigms and that the results from both analysis methods were correlated. The advantages of each production procedure and analysis method are discussed.

填补空白:807 个欧洲葡萄牙语句子的 Cloze 概率和句子约束规范。
句子处理受句子上下文和词语预期的影响。要在实验中研究句子理解,就需要同时使用上下文限制和单词预期来测量句子的完成规范。本研究进行了两次实验,收集了 807 个欧洲葡萄牙语句子的完成规范。上下文限制是通过类型-标记比率和特异性反应比例来衡量的,而单词期望值则是通过loze概率来评估的。除了为大量句子样本建立规范外,本研究还调查了制作程序和分析方法的影响。在实验 1 中,使用的是单项生成程序,即被试只用一个回答来完成每个句子片段;而在实验 2 中,使用的是多项生成程序,即被试必须为每个句子片段提供最多三个完成词。在实验 2 中,分析采用了两种不同的方法:第一反应分析和综合反应分析。结果表明,"掐头去尾 "和 "语境测量 "在不同的制作范式中具有可比性,而且两种分析方法得出的结果具有相关性。本文讨论了每种制作过程和分析方法的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信