Sitting Capacity and Performance in Infants with Typical Development and Infants with Motor Delay.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Kari S Kretch, Natalie A Koziol, Emily C Marcinowski, Lin-Ya Hsu, Regina T Harbourne, Michele A Lobo, Sarah W McCoy, Sandra L Willett, Stacey C Dusing
{"title":"Sitting Capacity and Performance in Infants with Typical Development and Infants with Motor Delay.","authors":"Kari S Kretch, Natalie A Koziol, Emily C Marcinowski, Lin-Ya Hsu, Regina T Harbourne, Michele A Lobo, Sarah W McCoy, Sandra L Willett, Stacey C Dusing","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2023.2241537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Infants with neuromotor disorders demonstrate delays in sitting skills (decreased capacity) and are less likely to maintain independent sitting during play than their peers with typical development (decreased performance). This study aimed to quantify developmental trajectories of sitting capacity and sitting performance in infants with typical development and infants with significant motor delay and to assess whether the relationship between capacity and performance differs between the groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Typically developing infants (<i>n</i> = 35) and infants with significant motor delay (<i>n</i> = 31) were assessed longitudinally over a year following early sitting readiness. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) Sitting Dimension was used to assess sitting capacity, and a 5-min free play observation was used to assess sitting performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both capacity and performance increased at a faster rate initially, with more deceleration across time, in infants with typical development compared to infants with motor delay. At lower GMFM scores, changes in GMFM sitting were associated with larger changes in independent sitting for infants with typical development, and the association between GMFM sitting and independent sitting varied more across GMFM scores for typically developing infants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intervention and assessment for infants with motor delay should target both sitting capacity and sitting performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"164-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2023.2241537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Infants with neuromotor disorders demonstrate delays in sitting skills (decreased capacity) and are less likely to maintain independent sitting during play than their peers with typical development (decreased performance). This study aimed to quantify developmental trajectories of sitting capacity and sitting performance in infants with typical development and infants with significant motor delay and to assess whether the relationship between capacity and performance differs between the groups.

Methods: Typically developing infants (n = 35) and infants with significant motor delay (n = 31) were assessed longitudinally over a year following early sitting readiness. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) Sitting Dimension was used to assess sitting capacity, and a 5-min free play observation was used to assess sitting performance.

Results: Both capacity and performance increased at a faster rate initially, with more deceleration across time, in infants with typical development compared to infants with motor delay. At lower GMFM scores, changes in GMFM sitting were associated with larger changes in independent sitting for infants with typical development, and the association between GMFM sitting and independent sitting varied more across GMFM scores for typically developing infants.

Conclusions: Intervention and assessment for infants with motor delay should target both sitting capacity and sitting performance.

发育典型婴儿和运动迟缓婴儿的坐立能力和表现。
目的:与发育正常的婴儿相比,患有神经运动障碍的婴儿在坐姿技能方面表现出延迟(能力下降),并且在游戏过程中保持独立坐姿的可能性较低(表现下降)。本研究旨在量化发育典型婴儿和运动发育严重迟缓婴儿的坐姿能力和坐姿表现的发展轨迹,并评估这两组婴儿的坐姿能力和坐姿表现之间的关系是否存在差异:方法:对发育典型的婴儿(35 人)和运动明显迟缓的婴儿(31 人)在早期坐姿准备就绪后的一年内进行纵向评估。粗大运动功能测量(GMFM)坐姿维度用于评估坐的能力,5分钟自由游戏观察用于评估坐的表现:结果:与运动发育迟缓的婴儿相比,发育典型的婴儿的坐姿能力和坐姿表现最初都有较快的增长,但随着时间的推移,增长速度会逐渐减慢。在全球移动能力模型得分较低的情况下,全球移动能力模型坐姿的变化与典型发育婴儿独立坐姿的较大变化相关,而对于典型发育婴儿来说,全球移动能力模型坐姿与独立坐姿之间的关系在不同的全球移动能力模型得分下变化更大:结论:对运动迟缓婴儿的干预和评估应同时针对坐立能力和坐立表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信