A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Nobuhiro Nohara, Yukari Yamanaka, Mikiko Matsuoka, Tadahiro Yamazaki, Keisuke Kawai, Shu Takakura, Nobuyuki Sudo, Tetsuya Ando, Yutaka Matsuyama, Susan Byrne, Riccardo Dalle Grave, Zafra Cooper, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi
{"title":"A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol.","authors":"Nobuhiro Nohara,&nbsp;Yukari Yamanaka,&nbsp;Mikiko Matsuoka,&nbsp;Tadahiro Yamazaki,&nbsp;Keisuke Kawai,&nbsp;Shu Takakura,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Sudo,&nbsp;Tetsuya Ando,&nbsp;Yutaka Matsuyama,&nbsp;Susan Byrne,&nbsp;Riccardo Dalle Grave,&nbsp;Zafra Cooper,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi","doi":"10.1186/s13030-023-00277-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The superiority of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) with regard to weight gain and improvement of psychopathology of eating disorders for patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) over other psychotherapies and treatment as usual (TAU) has not been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, a previous RCT showed that patients with AN whose baseline body mass index (BMI) was less than 17.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> gained more weight when treated with CBT-E than with other psychotherapies. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of CBT-E and TAU for patients with AN. It was hypothesized that CBT-E would be superior to TAU, at least in terms of weight gain, as most patients with AN are likely to have a BMI lower than 17.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>A randomized parallel-group multicenter trial will be conducted in three teaching hospitals in Japan between January 2023 and March 2026. Patients with DSM-5 AN, aged 16 years and older, with a BMI equal to or above 14.0 and below 18.5 will be eligible to participate. 56 patients will be randomly and evenly assigned to two intervention groups (CBT-E and TAU). Those assigned to CBT-E will be offered 25-40 sessions in accordance with their initial BMI. Patients assigned to TAU will have at least one session every 2 weeks, with the number of sessions and treatment period not fixed in advance. The primary outcome is BMI at 40 weeks after treatment initiation. The secondary outcomes are the results from the Japanese version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Clinical Impairment Assessment questionnaire to measure eating disorder psychopathology and psychological impairment. The follow-up assessment will be performed 6 months after the 40-week assessment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This multi-center randomized controlled study will probably evaluate the efficacy of CBT-E compared with TAU for patients with more severe AN than in previous studies since Japanese patients are likely to have a lower BMI than those in Western countries. While it may be difficult to generalize the results of a study conducted in Japan, it would be valuable to clarify the efficacy of CBT-E as a treatment package.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN, UMIN000048847. Registered 12 Sep 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9027,"journal":{"name":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-023-00277-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The superiority of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) with regard to weight gain and improvement of psychopathology of eating disorders for patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) over other psychotherapies and treatment as usual (TAU) has not been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, a previous RCT showed that patients with AN whose baseline body mass index (BMI) was less than 17.5 kg/m2 gained more weight when treated with CBT-E than with other psychotherapies. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of CBT-E and TAU for patients with AN. It was hypothesized that CBT-E would be superior to TAU, at least in terms of weight gain, as most patients with AN are likely to have a BMI lower than 17.5 kg/m2.

Methods/design: A randomized parallel-group multicenter trial will be conducted in three teaching hospitals in Japan between January 2023 and March 2026. Patients with DSM-5 AN, aged 16 years and older, with a BMI equal to or above 14.0 and below 18.5 will be eligible to participate. 56 patients will be randomly and evenly assigned to two intervention groups (CBT-E and TAU). Those assigned to CBT-E will be offered 25-40 sessions in accordance with their initial BMI. Patients assigned to TAU will have at least one session every 2 weeks, with the number of sessions and treatment period not fixed in advance. The primary outcome is BMI at 40 weeks after treatment initiation. The secondary outcomes are the results from the Japanese version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Clinical Impairment Assessment questionnaire to measure eating disorder psychopathology and psychological impairment. The follow-up assessment will be performed 6 months after the 40-week assessment.

Discussion: This multi-center randomized controlled study will probably evaluate the efficacy of CBT-E compared with TAU for patients with more severe AN than in previous studies since Japanese patients are likely to have a lower BMI than those in Western countries. While it may be difficult to generalize the results of a study conducted in Japan, it would be valuable to clarify the efficacy of CBT-E as a treatment package.

Trial registration: UMIN, UMIN000048847. Registered 12 Sep 2022.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项多中心、随机、平行组研究,比较强化认知行为疗法(CBT-E)与常规治疗(TAU)治疗神经性厌食症的疗效:研究方案。
背景:在随机对照试验(RCTs)中,增强认知行为疗法(CBT-E)在神经性厌食症(AN)患者体重增加和饮食失调精神病理改善方面优于其他心理疗法和常规治疗(TAU)的优势尚未得到证实。然而,先前的一项随机对照试验显示,基线体重指数(BMI)低于17.5 kg/m2的AN患者在接受CBT-E治疗时体重增加多于其他心理治疗。该研究的目的是比较CBT-E和TAU治疗AN患者的疗效。假设CBT-E至少在体重增加方面优于TAU,因为大多数AN患者的BMI可能低于17.5 kg/m2。方法/设计:将于2023年1月至2026年3月在日本三家教学医院进行随机平行组多中心试验。患有DSM-5 AN的患者,年龄在16岁及以上,BMI等于或高于14.0,低于18.5,将有资格参加。56例患者将被随机均匀地分配到两个干预组(CBT-E和TAU)。那些被分配到CBT-E的患者将根据他们最初的BMI进行25-40次的治疗。分配到TAU的患者至少每2周进行一次治疗,治疗次数和治疗时间未事先确定。主要结局是治疗开始后40周的BMI。次要结果为日文版进食障碍检查问卷和临床损害评估问卷,用于测量进食障碍精神病理和心理损害。随访评估将在40周评估后6个月进行。讨论:这项多中心随机对照研究可能会评估CBT-E与TAU相比对于比以往研究更严重的AN患者的疗效,因为日本患者的BMI可能低于西方国家的患者。虽然很难概括在日本进行的一项研究的结果,但澄清CBT-E作为一种治疗方案的有效性将是有价值的。试验注册号:UMIN, UMIN000048847。注册于2022年9月12日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BioPsychoSocial Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the interrelationships between the biological, psychological, social, and behavioral factors of health and illness. BioPsychoSocial Medicine is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine, and publishes research on psychosomatic disorders and diseases that are characterized by objective organic changes and/or functional changes that could be induced, progressed, aggravated, or exacerbated by psychological, social, and/or behavioral factors and their associated psychosomatic treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信