Urodynamic and urethral pressure profilometry findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction treated with surgical urethrolysis.

Amy D Dobberfuhl, Craig V Comiter, Sayantan Deb
{"title":"Urodynamic and urethral pressure profilometry findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction treated with surgical urethrolysis.","authors":"Amy D Dobberfuhl, Craig V Comiter, Sayantan Deb","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-term urodynamic (UDS) and urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an anti-incontinence (AI) procedure have been poorly characterized. We report our 10-year UDS findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction after AI procedure, who underwent urethrolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified sequential records containing urethrolysis current procedural terminology codes over a 10-year period. Records of women with preoperative UDS were reviewed for demographics, UDS tracing, and outcomes following urethrolysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five women (mean age 60 years) had voiding phase dysfunction and underwent urethrolysis at a mean of 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-61) after AI procedure. Preoperatively, six (24%) women required intermittent catheterization. Free uroflowmetry revealed a mean maximum peak flow (Qmax) of 9.6 ml/s (IQR 7.0-11.0), voided volume of 137 ml (IQR 81-169), and postvoid residual of 167 ml (IQR 43-288). UDS revealed a mean UPP length of 24 mm (IQR 20-27), UPP closure pressure of 78 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (IQR 59-103), detrusor pressure at maximum flow (Pdet@Qmax) of 31 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (IQR 19-43), Qmax of 7.9 ml/s (IQR 5.0-12.0), bladder outlet obstruction index of 15 (IQR 0-34), and bladder contractility index of 71 (IQR 60-81). UPP length was significantly associated (Pearson correlation, p<0.05) with bladder outlet obstruction index (r=0.80), Pdet@Qmax (r=0.75), and time since AI procedure (r=-0.70). UPP closure pressure was significantly associated with age (r=-0.64), volume of first (r=-0.64) and strong (r=-0.78) desire, and capacity (r=-0.71). Following urethrolysis, spontaneous voiding was achieved in 23 (92%) women at followup (mean 308 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UPP may help characterize outlet parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an AI procedure, who ultimately undergo urethrolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E374-E380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Long-term urodynamic (UDS) and urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an anti-incontinence (AI) procedure have been poorly characterized. We report our 10-year UDS findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction after AI procedure, who underwent urethrolysis.

Methods: We identified sequential records containing urethrolysis current procedural terminology codes over a 10-year period. Records of women with preoperative UDS were reviewed for demographics, UDS tracing, and outcomes following urethrolysis.

Results: Twenty-five women (mean age 60 years) had voiding phase dysfunction and underwent urethrolysis at a mean of 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-61) after AI procedure. Preoperatively, six (24%) women required intermittent catheterization. Free uroflowmetry revealed a mean maximum peak flow (Qmax) of 9.6 ml/s (IQR 7.0-11.0), voided volume of 137 ml (IQR 81-169), and postvoid residual of 167 ml (IQR 43-288). UDS revealed a mean UPP length of 24 mm (IQR 20-27), UPP closure pressure of 78 cmH2O (IQR 59-103), detrusor pressure at maximum flow (Pdet@Qmax) of 31 cmH2O (IQR 19-43), Qmax of 7.9 ml/s (IQR 5.0-12.0), bladder outlet obstruction index of 15 (IQR 0-34), and bladder contractility index of 71 (IQR 60-81). UPP length was significantly associated (Pearson correlation, p<0.05) with bladder outlet obstruction index (r=0.80), Pdet@Qmax (r=0.75), and time since AI procedure (r=-0.70). UPP closure pressure was significantly associated with age (r=-0.64), volume of first (r=-0.64) and strong (r=-0.78) desire, and capacity (r=-0.71). Following urethrolysis, spontaneous voiding was achieved in 23 (92%) women at followup (mean 308 days).

Conclusions: UPP may help characterize outlet parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an AI procedure, who ultimately undergo urethrolysis.

尿动力学和尿道压力谱分析在手术解尿治疗排尿期功能障碍的妇女中的发现。
导读:长期尿动力学(UDS)和尿道压力测量(UPP)参数在抗尿失禁(AI)手术后出现排尿期功能障碍的女性的特征尚不明确。我们报告了10年的UDS在人工智能手术后排尿期功能障碍的妇女中发现的结果,这些妇女接受了解尿术。方法:我们在10年的时间里确定了包含尿道溶解现行程序术语代码的顺序记录。回顾术前UDS患者的人口统计、UDS追踪和解尿后的结果。结果:25名女性(平均年龄60岁)在人工智能手术后平均47个月(四分位数间距[IQR] 12-61)出现排尿期功能障碍并进行了尿道溶解。术前,6名(24%)女性需要间歇性置管。自由尿流仪显示,平均最大峰流量(Qmax)为9.6 ml/s (IQR 7.0-11.0),空腔体积为137 ml (IQR 81-169),空腔后残留为167 ml (IQR 43-288)。UDS显示UPP平均长度为24 mm (IQR 20-27), UPP闭合压力为78 cmH2O (IQR 59-103),最大流量逼尿肌压力(Pdet@Qmax)为31 cmH2O (IQR 19-43), Qmax为7.9 ml/s (IQR 5.0-12.0),膀胱出口阻塞指数为15 (IQR 0-34),膀胱收缩指数为71 (IQR 60-81)。UPP长度显著相关(Pearson相关性,p)结论:UPP可能有助于确定AI手术后排尿期功能障碍的女性的出口参数,这些女性最终接受了解尿术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信