Diagnostic accuracy of retinal optical coherence tomography in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumour

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Myrthe A. Nuijts, Inge Stegeman, Giorgio L. Porro, Carlien A. M. Bennebroek, Tom van Seeters, Frank A. Proudlock, Antoinette Y. N. Schouten – van Meeteren, Saskia M. Imhof
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of retinal optical coherence tomography in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumour","authors":"Myrthe A. Nuijts,&nbsp;Inge Stegeman,&nbsp;Giorgio L. Porro,&nbsp;Carlien A. M. Bennebroek,&nbsp;Tom van Seeters,&nbsp;Frank A. Proudlock,&nbsp;Antoinette Y. N. Schouten – van Meeteren,&nbsp;Saskia M. Imhof","doi":"10.1111/aos.15650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and macular ganglion cell layer–inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness measurements to discriminate an abnormal visual function (i.e. abnormal age-based visual acuity and/or visual field defect) in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional analysis of a prospective longitudinal nationwide cohort study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands, including the national referral centre for paediatric oncology. Patients aged 0–18 years with a newly diagnosed brain tumour and reliable visual acuity and/or visual field examination and optical coherence tomography were included. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 115 patients included in the study (67 [58.3%] male; median age 10.6 years [range, 0.2–17.8 years]), reliable RNFL thickness and GCL-IPL thickness measurements were available in 92 patients (80.0%) and 84 patients (73.0%), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting an abnormal visual function was 74.5% for average RNFL thickness and 41.7% for average GCL-IPL thickness at a specificity of 44.5% and 82.9%, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 33.0% and 82.6% for the average RNFL thickness and 57.1% and 82.2% for the average GCL-IPL thickness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An abnormal visual function was discriminated correctly by using the average RNFL thickness in seven out of ten patients and by using the average GCL-IPL thickness in four out of ten patients. The relatively high NPVs signified that patients with normal average RNFL thickness and average GCL-IPL thickness measurements had a relative high certainty of a normal visual function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"101 6","pages":"658-669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aos.15650","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.15650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and macular ganglion cell layer–inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness measurements to discriminate an abnormal visual function (i.e. abnormal age-based visual acuity and/or visual field defect) in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumour.

Methods

This cross-sectional analysis of a prospective longitudinal nationwide cohort study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands, including the national referral centre for paediatric oncology. Patients aged 0–18 years with a newly diagnosed brain tumour and reliable visual acuity and/or visual field examination and optical coherence tomography were included. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

Of 115 patients included in the study (67 [58.3%] male; median age 10.6 years [range, 0.2–17.8 years]), reliable RNFL thickness and GCL-IPL thickness measurements were available in 92 patients (80.0%) and 84 patients (73.0%), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting an abnormal visual function was 74.5% for average RNFL thickness and 41.7% for average GCL-IPL thickness at a specificity of 44.5% and 82.9%, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 33.0% and 82.6% for the average RNFL thickness and 57.1% and 82.2% for the average GCL-IPL thickness.

Conclusion

An abnormal visual function was discriminated correctly by using the average RNFL thickness in seven out of ten patients and by using the average GCL-IPL thickness in four out of ten patients. The relatively high NPVs signified that patients with normal average RNFL thickness and average GCL-IPL thickness measurements had a relative high certainty of a normal visual function.

Abstract Image

视网膜光学相干断层扫描对儿童新诊断脑肿瘤的诊断准确性
目的评价新诊断脑肿瘤患儿乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度和黄斑神经节细胞层-内丛状层(GCL-IPL)厚度在鉴别视功能异常(即年龄视力异常和/或视野缺损)中的诊断准确性。方法:在荷兰的四家医院进行了一项前瞻性纵向全国队列研究的横断面分析,包括国家儿科肿瘤转诊中心。患者年龄0-18岁,新诊断的脑肿瘤,可靠的视力和/或视野检查和光学相干断层扫描。以敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)评价诊断准确性。结果纳入研究的115例患者中,男性67例(58.3%);中位年龄10.6岁[范围0.2-17.8岁]),分别有92例(80.0%)和84例(73.0%)患者可获得可靠的RNFL厚度和GCL-IPL厚度测量。RNFL平均厚度和GCL-IPL平均厚度的检测灵敏度分别为74.5%和41.7%,特异性分别为44.5%和82.9%。RNFL平均厚度的PPV和NPV分别为33.0%和82.6%,GCL-IPL平均厚度的PPV和NPV分别为57.1%和82.2%。结论利用RNFL平均厚度和GCL-IPL平均厚度分别对7 / 10和4 / 10的视功能异常进行了正确的判别。相对较高的npv值表明RNFL平均厚度和GCL-IPL平均厚度测量正常的患者具有相对较高的视觉功能正常的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信