Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration with Periosteal Pocket Flap Technique Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Clinical Trial Study
Farid Shiezadeh, Hamid Reza Arab, Vahid Khoshkam, Amir Moeintaghavi, Ali Forouzanfar, Leila Khodadadifard
{"title":"Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration with Periosteal Pocket Flap Technique Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Clinical Trial Study","authors":"Farid Shiezadeh, Hamid Reza Arab, Vahid Khoshkam, Amir Moeintaghavi, Ali Forouzanfar, Leila Khodadadifard","doi":"10.11607/prd.5691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess changes in the horizontal dimension of the alveolar ridge when the autogenous bone block (ABB) or periosteal pocket flap (PPF) techniques were performed prior to implant placement. This randomized trial study was conducted on 25 patients in need of horizontal bone augmentation, who were randomly divided into two groups as follows: 13 patients underwent ridge augmentation using ABB, allograft, and a collagen membrane, while the remaining 12 underwent horizontal bone augmentation via the PPF technique. For all patients, radiographic examinations via CBCT were performed both before and 26 weeks after the operation. Following the surgery, dimensional changes in the ridge width were measured both within and between the two groups in the three regions of 0, 3, and 5 mm from the top of the alveolar crest. A total of 11 patients in the ABB group and 12 patients in the PPF group successfully completed the study. Statistical analysis showed that the increase in alveolar ridge width in each group was significant, but not significantly different between the two groups at any of the measured spots (0 mm from the crest, P = .25; 3 mm, P = .38; and 5 mm, P = .73). However, more postoperative complications were observed with the ABB technique. According to the results of the present study, there was no statistically significant difference between the PPF and ABB techniques in terms of horizontal bone gain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.5691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess changes in the horizontal dimension of the alveolar ridge when the autogenous bone block (ABB) or periosteal pocket flap (PPF) techniques were performed prior to implant placement. This randomized trial study was conducted on 25 patients in need of horizontal bone augmentation, who were randomly divided into two groups as follows: 13 patients underwent ridge augmentation using ABB, allograft, and a collagen membrane, while the remaining 12 underwent horizontal bone augmentation via the PPF technique. For all patients, radiographic examinations via CBCT were performed both before and 26 weeks after the operation. Following the surgery, dimensional changes in the ridge width were measured both within and between the two groups in the three regions of 0, 3, and 5 mm from the top of the alveolar crest. A total of 11 patients in the ABB group and 12 patients in the PPF group successfully completed the study. Statistical analysis showed that the increase in alveolar ridge width in each group was significant, but not significantly different between the two groups at any of the measured spots (0 mm from the crest, P = .25; 3 mm, P = .38; and 5 mm, P = .73). However, more postoperative complications were observed with the ABB technique. According to the results of the present study, there was no statistically significant difference between the PPF and ABB techniques in terms of horizontal bone gain.
本研究的目的是评估自体骨块(ABB)或骨膜袋瓣(PPF)技术在种植体放置之前对牙槽嵴水平尺寸的变化。本随机试验研究纳入25例需要水平骨增强的患者,随机分为两组:13例采用ABB、同种异体移植物和胶原膜进行嵴增强,其余12例采用PPF技术进行水平骨增强。所有患者术前和术后26周均行CBCT影像学检查。手术后,测量两组内和两组间距牙槽嵴顶部0,3和5mm三个区域脊宽的尺寸变化。ABB组共有11例患者和PPF组12例患者成功完成研究。统计分析显示,各组牙槽嵴宽度的增加均有显著性意义,但在任何测点(距牙嵴0 mm处),两组间差异均不显著,P = 0.25;3 mm, P = .38;5 mm, P = .73)。然而,ABB技术观察到更多的术后并发症。根据本研究的结果,PPF和ABB技术在水平骨增重方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry will
publish manuscripts concerned with all aspects of clinical periodontology,
restorative dentistry, and implantology. This includes pertinent research
as well as clinical methodology (their interdependence and relationship
should be addressed where applicable); proceedings of relevant symposia
or conferences; and quality review papers. Original manuscripts are considered for publication on the condition that they have not been published
or submitted for publication elsewhere.