Reproducibility of the pupillary light reflex over short intervals in psychiatric patients and community volunteers

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
William V. McCall, Jessica T. Dinsmore, Alicia Brown, Lucas T. Ribbens, Peter B. Rosenquist, Laryssa McCloud, Brian J. Miller
{"title":"Reproducibility of the pupillary light reflex over short intervals in psychiatric patients and community volunteers","authors":"William V. McCall,&nbsp;Jessica T. Dinsmore,&nbsp;Alicia Brown,&nbsp;Lucas T. Ribbens,&nbsp;Peter B. Rosenquist,&nbsp;Laryssa McCloud,&nbsp;Brian J. Miller","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pupillary light reflex (PLR) is a method for measuring dynamic responses within the autonomic nervous system, and would have potential value as a point-of-care test in a psychiatry clinic if reproducible results could be obtained in a short period of time. We collected PLR from adult community volunteers and depressed outpatients with the purpose of demonstrating (1) that valid data could be obtained &gt;90% of the time from both the community volunteers and the patients, and (2) that reproducible results could be obtained with repeated measurement over short periods of time. Valid data were captured for 90.3% of 76 participants, allowing for two attempts of the PLR per participant. Success rates were similar for depressed patients and community volunteers. Eighteen of these 76 participants provided repeated paired measurements after 5 and 10 min of dark adaptation, producing high correlations for maximum constriction velocity (MCV) between assay 1 and 2 (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.71, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), but there was a significant 8% increase in velocity for MCV between assay 1 and 2 (∆ = 0.34 ± 0.59 mm/s, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). In contrast, PLR measurements were stable when tested in a separate cohort of 21 additional participants at 10 and 15 min of dark adaptation with an MCV Pearson's correlation of <i>r</i> = 0.84, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, with a nonsignificant 1% difference between the two time points. These findings indicate an acceptable rate of collecting valid and reproducible PLR data when contrasting two measurements of PLR after 10 or 15 min of dark adaptation in depressed and suicidal patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pupillary light reflex (PLR) is a method for measuring dynamic responses within the autonomic nervous system, and would have potential value as a point-of-care test in a psychiatry clinic if reproducible results could be obtained in a short period of time. We collected PLR from adult community volunteers and depressed outpatients with the purpose of demonstrating (1) that valid data could be obtained >90% of the time from both the community volunteers and the patients, and (2) that reproducible results could be obtained with repeated measurement over short periods of time. Valid data were captured for 90.3% of 76 participants, allowing for two attempts of the PLR per participant. Success rates were similar for depressed patients and community volunteers. Eighteen of these 76 participants provided repeated paired measurements after 5 and 10 min of dark adaptation, producing high correlations for maximum constriction velocity (MCV) between assay 1 and 2 (Pearson's r = 0.71, p < 0.001), but there was a significant 8% increase in velocity for MCV between assay 1 and 2 (∆ = 0.34 ± 0.59 mm/s, p < 0.05). In contrast, PLR measurements were stable when tested in a separate cohort of 21 additional participants at 10 and 15 min of dark adaptation with an MCV Pearson's correlation of r = 0.84, p < 0.001, with a nonsignificant 1% difference between the two time points. These findings indicate an acceptable rate of collecting valid and reproducible PLR data when contrasting two measurements of PLR after 10 or 15 min of dark adaptation in depressed and suicidal patients.

精神病人和社区志愿者短时间内瞳孔光反射的再现性
瞳孔光反射(PLR)是一种测量自主神经系统内动态反应的方法,如果能在短时间内获得可重复的结果,它将作为精神科诊所的护理点测试具有潜在价值。我们收集了来自成年社区志愿者和抑郁症门诊患者的PLR,目的是证明(1)可以获得有效的数据>;90%的时间来自社区志愿者和患者,以及(2)在短时间内重复测量可以获得可重复的结果。在76名参与者中,90.3%的参与者获得了有效数据,每个参与者可以尝试两次PLR。抑郁症患者和社区志愿者的成功率相似。这76名参与者中有18人在5岁和10岁后进行了重复的配对测量 暗适应的最小值,在测定1和2之间产生最大收缩速度(MCV)的高度相关性(Pearson’s r = 0.71,p <; 0.001),但在试验1和试验2之间MCV的速度显著增加了8%(∆ = 0.34 ± 0.59 mm/s,p <; 0.05)。相反,当在10岁和15岁的另外21名参与者的单独队列中进行测试时,PLR测量结果是稳定的 暗适应的最小值与r的MCV-Pearson相关性 = 0.84,p <; 0.001,在两个时间点之间具有不显著的1%的差异。这些发现表明,当对比10或15年后的两次PLR测量时,收集有效和可重复的PLR数据的速率是可接受的 抑郁和自杀患者的暗适应最小值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信