Lateral Bone Augmentation Using a Three-Dimensional-Printed Polymeric Chamber to Compare Biomaterials.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0025
Bart van Oirschot, Jeroen J J P van den Beucken, Antonios G Mikos, John A Jansen
{"title":"Lateral Bone Augmentation Using a Three-Dimensional-Printed Polymeric Chamber to Compare Biomaterials.","authors":"Bart van Oirschot, Jeroen J J P van den Beucken, Antonios G Mikos, John A Jansen","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to test the suitability of calcium phosphate cement mixed with poly(lactic-<i>co</i>-glycolic acid) (CPC-PLGA) microparticles into a ring-shaped polymeric space-maintaining device as bone graft material for lateral bone augmentation. Therefore, the bone chambers were installed on the lateral portion of the anterior region of the mandibular body of mini-pigs. Chambers were filled with either CPC-PLGA or BioOss<sup>®</sup> particles for comparison and left for 4 and 12 weeks. Histology and histomorphometry were used to obtain temporal insight in material degradation and bone formation. Results indicated that between 4 and 12 weeks of implantation, a significant degradation of the CPC-PLGA (from 75.1% to 23.1%), as well as BioOss material, occurred (from 40.6% to 14.4%). Degradation of both materials was associated with the presence of macrophage-like and osteoclast-like cells. Furthermore, a significant increase in bone formation occurred between 4 and 12 weeks for the CPC-PLGA (from 0.1% to 7.2%), as well as BioOss material (from 8.3% to 23.3%). Statistical analysis showed that bone formation had progressed significantly better using BioOss compared to CPC-PLGA (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, this mini-pig study showed that CPC-PLGA does not stimulate lateral bone augmentation using a bone chamber device. Both treatments failed to achieve \"clinically\" meaningful alveolar ridge augmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23154,"journal":{"name":"Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods","volume":"29 7","pages":"287-297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2023.0025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the suitability of calcium phosphate cement mixed with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (CPC-PLGA) microparticles into a ring-shaped polymeric space-maintaining device as bone graft material for lateral bone augmentation. Therefore, the bone chambers were installed on the lateral portion of the anterior region of the mandibular body of mini-pigs. Chambers were filled with either CPC-PLGA or BioOss® particles for comparison and left for 4 and 12 weeks. Histology and histomorphometry were used to obtain temporal insight in material degradation and bone formation. Results indicated that between 4 and 12 weeks of implantation, a significant degradation of the CPC-PLGA (from 75.1% to 23.1%), as well as BioOss material, occurred (from 40.6% to 14.4%). Degradation of both materials was associated with the presence of macrophage-like and osteoclast-like cells. Furthermore, a significant increase in bone formation occurred between 4 and 12 weeks for the CPC-PLGA (from 0.1% to 7.2%), as well as BioOss material (from 8.3% to 23.3%). Statistical analysis showed that bone formation had progressed significantly better using BioOss compared to CPC-PLGA (p < 0.05). In conclusion, this mini-pig study showed that CPC-PLGA does not stimulate lateral bone augmentation using a bone chamber device. Both treatments failed to achieve "clinically" meaningful alveolar ridge augmentation.

使用三维打印聚合腔体进行外侧骨增量,以比较生物材料。
本研究的目的是测试将磷酸钙骨水泥与聚(乳酸-共聚乙酸)(CPC-PLGA)微颗粒混合到环形聚合物空间保持装置中作为骨移植材料用于侧向骨增量的适用性。因此,骨室被安装在迷你猪下颌体前部的外侧部分。在骨腔中填充 CPC-PLGA 或 BioOss® 颗粒进行比较,并放置 4 周和 12 周。使用组织学和组织形态计量学来了解材料降解和骨形成的时间性。结果表明,在植入 4 至 12 周期间,CPC-PLGA 和 BioOss 材料都出现了明显的降解(从 75.1% 降至 23.1%)(从 40.6% 降至 14.4%)。这两种材料的降解都与巨噬细胞和破骨细胞的存在有关。此外,在 4 到 12 周期间,CPC-PLGA 和 BioOss 材料的骨形成率均有明显增加,前者从 0.1% 增加到 7.2%,后者从 8.3% 增加到 23.3%。统计分析表明,与 CPC-PLGA 相比,BioOss 的骨形成进展明显更好(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods
Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering is the preeminent, biomedical journal advancing the field with cutting-edge research and applications that repair or regenerate portions or whole tissues. This multidisciplinary journal brings together the principles of engineering and life sciences in the creation of artificial tissues and regenerative medicine. Tissue Engineering is divided into three parts, providing a central forum for groundbreaking scientific research and developments of clinical applications from leading experts in the field that will enable the functional replacement of tissues. Tissue Engineering Methods (Part C) presents innovative tools and assays in scaffold development, stem cells and biologically active molecules to advance the field and to support clinical translation. Part C publishes monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信