Population- and Community-Based Interventions to Prevent Suicide.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Eric J Linskens, Noah C Venables, Allison M Gustavson, Nina A Sayer, Maureen Murdoch, Roderick MacDonald, Kristen E Ullman, Lauren G McKenzie, Timothy J Wilt, Shahnaz Sultan
{"title":"Population- and Community-Based Interventions to Prevent Suicide.","authors":"Eric J Linskens,&nbsp;Noah C Venables,&nbsp;Allison M Gustavson,&nbsp;Nina A Sayer,&nbsp;Maureen Murdoch,&nbsp;Roderick MacDonald,&nbsp;Kristen E Ullman,&nbsp;Lauren G McKenzie,&nbsp;Timothy J Wilt,&nbsp;Shahnaz Sultan","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Suicide is estimated to account for 1.4% of deaths worldwide, making it among the leading causes of premature death. Public health approaches to reduce suicide have the potential to reach individuals across the spectrum of suicide risk. <i>Aims:</i> To review the effectiveness of newer community-based or population-level suicide prevention strategies. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted a systematic review of literature published from January 2010 to November 2020 to evaluate the effectiveness of community- and population-level interventions. The US Center for Disease Control framework was used for grouping studies by strategy. <i>Results:</i> We included 56 publications that described 47 unique studies. Interventions that reduce access to lethal means, implement organizational policies and culture in police workplace settings, and involve community screening for depression may reduce suicide deaths. It is unclear if other interventions such as public awareness and education campaigns, crisis lines, and gatekeeper training prevent suicide. Evidence was inconsistent for community-based, multistrategy interventions. The most promising multistrategy intervention was the European Alliance Against Depression. <i>Limitations:</i> Most eligible studies were observational and many lacked concurrent control groups or adjustment for confounding variables. <i>Conclusions:</i> Community-based interventions that may reduce suicide deaths include reducing access to lethal means, implementing organizational policies in workplace settings, screening for depression, and the multistrategy European Alliance Against Depression Program. Evidence was unclear, inconsistent, or lacking regarding the impact of many other single- or multistrategy interventions on suicide deaths.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"44 4","pages":"330-340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Suicide is estimated to account for 1.4% of deaths worldwide, making it among the leading causes of premature death. Public health approaches to reduce suicide have the potential to reach individuals across the spectrum of suicide risk. Aims: To review the effectiveness of newer community-based or population-level suicide prevention strategies. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of literature published from January 2010 to November 2020 to evaluate the effectiveness of community- and population-level interventions. The US Center for Disease Control framework was used for grouping studies by strategy. Results: We included 56 publications that described 47 unique studies. Interventions that reduce access to lethal means, implement organizational policies and culture in police workplace settings, and involve community screening for depression may reduce suicide deaths. It is unclear if other interventions such as public awareness and education campaigns, crisis lines, and gatekeeper training prevent suicide. Evidence was inconsistent for community-based, multistrategy interventions. The most promising multistrategy intervention was the European Alliance Against Depression. Limitations: Most eligible studies were observational and many lacked concurrent control groups or adjustment for confounding variables. Conclusions: Community-based interventions that may reduce suicide deaths include reducing access to lethal means, implementing organizational policies in workplace settings, screening for depression, and the multistrategy European Alliance Against Depression Program. Evidence was unclear, inconsistent, or lacking regarding the impact of many other single- or multistrategy interventions on suicide deaths.

预防自杀的人口和社区干预措施。
背景:据估计,自杀占全世界死亡人数的1.4%,使其成为过早死亡的主要原因之一。减少自杀的公共卫生方法有可能惠及所有自杀风险人群。目的:回顾新的社区或人群层面自杀预防策略的有效性。方法:我们对2010年1月至2020年11月发表的文献进行了系统回顾,以评估社区和人群层面干预措施的有效性。采用美国疾病控制中心框架进行策略分组研究。结果:我们纳入了56篇出版物,描述了47项独特的研究。减少获得致命手段的机会、在警察工作场所环境中实施组织政策和文化以及涉及社区抑郁症筛查的干预措施可能会减少自杀死亡。目前尚不清楚其他干预措施,如公众意识和教育活动、危机热线和看门人培训是否能预防自杀。基于社区的多策略干预措施的证据不一致。最有希望的多策略干预是欧洲抗抑郁联盟。局限性:大多数符合条件的研究是观察性的,许多研究缺乏并发对照组或对混杂变量的调整。结论:以社区为基础的干预措施可能减少自杀死亡,包括减少致命手段的使用,在工作场所实施组织政策,筛查抑郁症,以及多策略欧洲抗抑郁联盟计划。关于许多其他单一或多策略干预措施对自杀死亡的影响,证据不明确、不一致或缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信