Finite element analysis to assess stress and deformation in bone with glass fiber-reinforced-poly-ether-ether-ketone, zirconia, and titanium implants.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Syeda Amtul Haseeb, Anju S Kumar, M P Chaitra, K C Vinaya, Soumya Shivananda Gudal, Fathima Parveen Rahmam, Prashant Babaji
{"title":"Finite element analysis to assess stress and deformation in bone with glass fiber-reinforced-poly-ether-ether-ketone, zirconia, and titanium implants.","authors":"Syeda Amtul Haseeb,&nbsp;Anju S Kumar,&nbsp;M P Chaitra,&nbsp;K C Vinaya,&nbsp;Soumya Shivananda Gudal,&nbsp;Fathima Parveen Rahmam,&nbsp;Prashant Babaji","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_184_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recently, zirconia ceramic and glass or carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) composites have been introduced as newer implant biomaterials. This study was done to evaluate stress and deformation in bone with glass fiber-reinforced (GFR)-PEEK, zirconia, and titanium implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A geometric model of mandibular molar replaced with implant-supported crown was generated. Implant of 12 mm length and 4.5 mm diameter was used in study. Finite element analysis models of implant assemblies of three materials GFR-PEEK, zirconium, and titanium were generated. 150 N loads were applied obliquely and vertically along the long axis of implant. Von Mises stresses and deformation generated were compared using ANSYS Workbench 17.0 and finite element software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three implant assemblies, i.e., GFR-PEEK, zirconia, and titanium, demonstrated similar stresses and deformation in bone without significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was concluded that GFR-PEEK and zirconia implants can be used as a substitute to titanium implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/ff/TCMJ-35-231.PMC10399843.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_184_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Recently, zirconia ceramic and glass or carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) composites have been introduced as newer implant biomaterials. This study was done to evaluate stress and deformation in bone with glass fiber-reinforced (GFR)-PEEK, zirconia, and titanium implants.

Materials and methods: A geometric model of mandibular molar replaced with implant-supported crown was generated. Implant of 12 mm length and 4.5 mm diameter was used in study. Finite element analysis models of implant assemblies of three materials GFR-PEEK, zirconium, and titanium were generated. 150 N loads were applied obliquely and vertically along the long axis of implant. Von Mises stresses and deformation generated were compared using ANSYS Workbench 17.0 and finite element software.

Results: All three implant assemblies, i.e., GFR-PEEK, zirconia, and titanium, demonstrated similar stresses and deformation in bone without significant difference.

Conclusion: It was concluded that GFR-PEEK and zirconia implants can be used as a substitute to titanium implants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用有限元分析评估玻璃纤维增强聚醚醚酮、氧化锆和钛植入物在骨中的应力和变形。
目的:近年来,氧化锆陶瓷和玻璃或碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮(PEEK)复合材料作为较新的植入生物材料被引入。本研究评估了玻璃纤维增强(GFR)-PEEK、氧化锆和钛植入物对骨的应力和变形。材料与方法:制作种植冠代替下颌磨牙的几何模型。种植体长度为12mm,直径为4.5 mm。建立了GFR-PEEK、锆、钛三种材料种植体组件的有限元分析模型。沿种植体长轴斜向和垂直方向施加150 N载荷。利用ANSYS Workbench 17.0和有限元软件对产生的Von Mises应力和变形进行比较。结果:GFR-PEEK、氧化锆和钛三种种植体组件在骨内的应力和变形相似,无显著差异。结论:GFR-PEEK和氧化锆种植体可作为钛种植体的替代材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信