The knowledge of memory aging questionnaire (KMAQ) in a Brazilian sample: a questionnaire for informants to recognize early signs of dementia.

Q3 Medicine
Mariel Carolina Montiel-Aponte, Paulo Henrique Ferreira Bertolucci, Gustavo Gil Velho Rocha
{"title":"The knowledge of memory aging questionnaire (KMAQ) in a Brazilian sample: a questionnaire for informants to recognize early signs of dementia.","authors":"Mariel Carolina Montiel-Aponte,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Ferreira Bertolucci,&nbsp;Gustavo Gil Velho Rocha","doi":"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Till present, only a few countries have developed support programs for caregivers and families of patients with dementia aimed to improve knowledge, skills, and strategies to deal with the patient's symptoms. However, prior to offering this special support, it is important to identify beliefs and thoughts shared by informants related to cognition in elderly people. Questionnaires are instruments that allow having this information, such as the Knowledge of Memory Aging Questionnaire (KMAQ), which was designed to assess normal and pathological changes in the aging process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge about cognition, aging, and dementia as evaluated by the KMAQ in people who are in contact with elderly people, with and without cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 78 relatives and caregivers of elderly patients were classified into two groups: group 1: relatives of patients with dementia (n1=48), and group 2: relatives of patients without cognitive impairment (n2=30). They were asked to answer some questionnaires about dementia, including the KMAQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the questionnaire's scores for normal cognitive changes items (g1: 0.53 <i>vs.</i> g2: 0.53, p-value: 0.99) did not show differences between the knowledge in both groups, nor shows the scores for pathological cognitive changes items (g1: 0.55 <i>vs.</i> g2: 0.55, p-value: 0.969).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It seems that being in contact with dementia does not improve knowledge about it. Knowledge of normal changes in cognition could make it possible to recognize \"red flags\" suggestive of neurodegenerative processes, allowing for earlier diagnosis and more options for treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39167,"journal":{"name":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Till present, only a few countries have developed support programs for caregivers and families of patients with dementia aimed to improve knowledge, skills, and strategies to deal with the patient's symptoms. However, prior to offering this special support, it is important to identify beliefs and thoughts shared by informants related to cognition in elderly people. Questionnaires are instruments that allow having this information, such as the Knowledge of Memory Aging Questionnaire (KMAQ), which was designed to assess normal and pathological changes in the aging process.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge about cognition, aging, and dementia as evaluated by the KMAQ in people who are in contact with elderly people, with and without cognitive impairment.

Methods: A total of 78 relatives and caregivers of elderly patients were classified into two groups: group 1: relatives of patients with dementia (n1=48), and group 2: relatives of patients without cognitive impairment (n2=30). They were asked to answer some questionnaires about dementia, including the KMAQ.

Results: Comparing the questionnaire's scores for normal cognitive changes items (g1: 0.53 vs. g2: 0.53, p-value: 0.99) did not show differences between the knowledge in both groups, nor shows the scores for pathological cognitive changes items (g1: 0.55 vs. g2: 0.55, p-value: 0.969).

Conclusions: It seems that being in contact with dementia does not improve knowledge about it. Knowledge of normal changes in cognition could make it possible to recognize "red flags" suggestive of neurodegenerative processes, allowing for earlier diagnosis and more options for treatment.

Abstract Image

巴西样本的记忆老化知识问卷(KMAQ):一份用于被调查者识别痴呆早期症状的问卷。
到目前为止,只有少数国家为痴呆症患者的照顾者和家属制定了支持规划,旨在提高知识、技能和应对患者症状的策略。然而,在提供这种特殊支持之前,重要的是要确定与老年人认知相关的信息提供者共享的信念和想法。问卷是提供这些信息的工具,例如记忆衰老知识问卷(KMAQ),旨在评估衰老过程中的正常和病理变化。目的:本研究的目的是评估由KMAQ评估的认知、衰老和痴呆知识在与老年人接触的人群中,有和没有认知障碍。方法:将78例老年患者亲属及照顾者分为两组:1组为痴呆患者亲属(n1=48), 2组为无认知障碍患者亲属(n2=30)。他们被要求回答一些关于痴呆症的问卷,包括KMAQ。结果:正常认知改变项目得分比较(g1: 0.53 vs. g2: 0.53, p值:0.99),两组知识差异无统计学意义;病理认知改变项目得分比较(g1: 0.55 vs. g2: 0.55, p值:0.969)。结论:与痴呆症接触似乎并没有提高对痴呆症的认识。了解正常的认知变化可以使识别提示神经退行性过程的“危险信号”成为可能,从而允许更早的诊断和更多的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dementia e Neuropsychologia
Dementia e Neuropsychologia Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dementia top Neuropsychologia the official scientific journal of the Cognitive Neurology and Ageing Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology and of the Brazilian Association of Geriatric Neuropsychiatry, is published by the "Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento", a nonprofit Brazilian association. Regularly published on March, June, September, and December since 2007.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信